skip to main content
10.1145/1168987.1169013acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Determining the impact of computer frustration on the mood of blind users browsing the web

Published: 23 October 2006 Publication History

Abstract

While previous studies have investigated the impact of frustration on computer users' mood as well as the causes of frustration, no research has ever been conducted to examine the relationship between computer frustrations and mood change for users with visual impairment. In this paper, we report on a study that examined the frustrating experiences and mood change of 100 participants, all with visual impairments, when they were browsing the web. The result shows that frustration does cause the participants' mood to deteriorate. However, the amount of time lost due to frustrating situations does not have a significant impact on users' mood, which is very different from the previous research on users without visual impairment. The impact on work seems to have the greatest impact on user mood.

References

[1]
Anttonen, J. and Surakka, V., Affect and intimacy: Emotions and heart rate while sitting on a chair. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (2005), 491--499.
[2]
Ceaparu, I., Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Robinson, J. and Shneiderman, B. Determining Causes and Severity of End-User Frustration. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 3 (2004), 333--356.
[3]
Feng, J., Karat, C. and Sears, A. How Productivity Improves in Hands-Free Continuous Dictation Tasks: Lessons Learned from a Longitudinal Study. Interacting with Computers, 17,3 (2005), 265--289.
[4]
Hackett, S., Parmento, B. and Zeng, X., Accessibility of Internet Websites Through Time. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Assistive Technology (ASSETS), (2004), 32--39.
[5]
Hazlett, R., Measurement of user frustration: a biologic approach. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2003), 734--735.
[6]
Kiesler, S., Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Scherlis, W. and Mukhopadhyay, T., Usability, help desk calls, and residential internet usage. Proceedings of the ACM Human Factors in Computing Conference (CHI) Extended Abstracts, (1997), 536--537.
[7]
Kleinbaum, D., Kupper, L., Muller, K. and Nizam, A. Applied Regression Analysis and Multivariable Methods. Duxbury Press, 1997.
[8]
Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J. and Kiesler, S. The homenet field trial of residential internet services. Communications of the ACM, 39, 12 (1996), 55--63.
[9]
Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J. and Lawrence, J., Methodological Issues in Using Time Diaries to Collect Frustration Data from Blind Computer Users. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII), (2005), On CD-ROM.
[10]
Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J. and Malarkey, C., What frustrates screen reader users on the web: A study of 100 blind users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2006, in press).
[11]
Lazar, J., Beere, P., Greenidge, K. and Nagappa, Y. Web Accessibility in the Mid-Atlantic United States: A Study of 50 Web Sites. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2, 4 (2003), 331--341.
[12]
Lazar, J. and Greenidge, K. One year older, but not necessarily wiser: An Evaluation of Homepage Accessibility Problems Over Time. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 4 (2006), 285--291.
[13]
Lazar, J., Jones, A., Hackley, M. and Shneiderman, B. Severity and Impact of Computer User Frustration: A Comparison of Student and Workplace Users. Interacting with Computers, 18, 2 (2006), 187--207.
[14]
Lazar, J., Jones, A. and Shneiderman, B. Workplace User Frustration with Computers: An Exploratory Investigation of the Causes and Severity. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25, 3 (2006), 239--251.
[15]
Lazar, J., Meiselwitz, G. and Norcio, A. A Taxonomy of Novice User Perception of Error on the Web. Universal Access in the Information Society, 3, 3/4 (2004), 202--208.
[16]
Loiacono, E. and McCoy, S. Web site accessibility: an online sector analysis. Information Technology and People, 17, 1 (2004), 87--101.
[17]
Mandryk, R., Atkins, S. and Inkpen, K., Novel methods: emotions, gestures, events: A continuous and objective evaluation of emotional experience with interactive play environments,. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (2006), 1027--1036.
[18]
Murrell, A. and Sprinkle, J. The impact of negative attitudes towards computers on employees' satisfaction and commitment within a small company. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 1 (1993), 57--63.
[19]
National Federation of the Blind. Braille Usage: Perspectives of Legally Blind Adults and Policy Implications for School Administrators, 2005, Available at: http://www.nfb.org/brusage.htm.
[20]
Riseberg, J., Klein, J., Fernandez, R. and Picard, R., Frustrating the user on purpose: Using biosignals in a pilot study to detect the user's emotional state. Proceedings of the CHI 1998: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (1998), 227--228.
[21]
Robinson, J. and Godbey Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA, 1997.
[22]
Sears, A., Feng, J., Oseitutu, K. and Karat, C. Speech-Based Navigation during Dictation: Difficulties, Consequences, and Solutions. Human Computer Interaction, 18, 3 (2003), 229--257.
[23]
Slatin, J. and Rush, S. Maximum Accessibility. Addison-Wesley, New York, 2003.
[24]
Stowers, G. The state of federal web sites: the pursuit of excellence. Available at: http://endowment.pwcglobal.com/pdfs/StowersReport0802.pdf, (2002).
[25]
Sullivan, T. and Matson, R., Barriers to use: Usability and Content Accessibility on the web's most popular sites. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability, (2000), 139--144.
[26]
Wall, S. and Brewster, S., Feeling what you hear: Tactile feedback for navigation of audio graphs. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (2006), 1123--1132.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Conservation of resources theory perspective of social media ostracism influence on lurking intentionsBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.215987343:1(212-229)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2023
  • (2020)An Activity Centered Approach to Nonvisual Computer InteractionACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/337421127:2(1-27)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2020
  • (2020)European Union Law Relating to Access to Online Technology for Disabled People in the Context of the WorkplaceThe Palgrave Handbook of Disability at Work10.1007/978-3-030-42966-9_17(293-312)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
Assets '06: Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
October 2006
316 pages
ISBN:1595932909
DOI:10.1145/1168987
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 October 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. assistive technology
  2. emotion
  3. error
  4. frustration
  5. screen reader
  6. time diary
  7. visual impairment
  8. web usability

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

ASSETS06
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 436 of 1,556 submissions, 28%

Upcoming Conference

ASSETS '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Conservation of resources theory perspective of social media ostracism influence on lurking intentionsBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.215987343:1(212-229)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2023
  • (2020)An Activity Centered Approach to Nonvisual Computer InteractionACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/337421127:2(1-27)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2020
  • (2020)European Union Law Relating to Access to Online Technology for Disabled People in the Context of the WorkplaceThe Palgrave Handbook of Disability at Work10.1007/978-3-030-42966-9_17(293-312)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2020
  • (2019)Automatic switching between speech and non-speech: adaptive auditory feedback in desktop assistance for the visually impairedUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-019-00696-5Online publication date: 16-Oct-2019
  • (2017)Technology-Mediated SightProceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3132525.3132552(220-229)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2017
  • (2017)Beyond auditionProceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3123024.3123201(330-334)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2017
  • (2016)Social Dimensions of Technology-Mediated SightProceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/2982142.2982190(299-300)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2016
  • (2016)Exploring the relationship between web accessibility and user experienceInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.03.00891:C(13-23)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016
  • (2016)Inclusive Process and Tool for Evaluation of Accessible User Experience (AUX)Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Methods, Techniques, and Best Practices10.1007/978-3-319-40250-5_6(59-69)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2016
  • (2014)Impact of Accessibility Barriers on the Mood of Blind, Low-vision and Sighted UsersProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.04727(431-440)Online publication date: 2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media