ABSTRACT
This paper presents results of an extensive long-term click-stream study of Web browser usage. Focusing on character and challenges of page revisitation, previous findings from seven to thirteen years ago are updated. The term page re-visit had to be differentiated, since the recurrence rate--the key measure for the share of page revisits--turns out to strongly depend on interpretation. We identify different types of revisitation that allow assessing the quality of current user support and developing concepts for new tools.
Individual navigation strategies differ dramatically and are strongly influenced by personal habits and type of site visited. Based on user action logs and interviews, we distinguished short-term revisits (backtrack or undo) from medium-term (re-utilize or observe) and long-term revisits (rediscover). We analyze current problems and provide suggestions for improving support for different revisitation types.
- Abrams, D., Baecker, R., Chignell, M. Information Archiving With Bookmarks: Personal Web Space Construction and Organization. In Proc. CHI 98, ACM Press (1998), 41--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barrett, R., Maglio, P.P., Kellem, D.C. How to Personalize the Web. In Proc. CHI '97, ACM Press (1997), 75--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Berners-Lee, T.: Information management: a proposal. CERN, March 1989.Google Scholar
- Brown, B., Sellen, A. Exploring Users' Experiences of the Web, First Monday 6(9), 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bush, V. As We May Think. The Atlantic Monthly. July 1945; Reprinted in Interactions, (III)2, 1996, 35--46. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Catledge, L.D., Pitkow, J.E. Characterizing browsing strategies in the World-Wide Web. In Proc. WWW 1995, ACM Press (1995), 1065--1073. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cockburn, A., Greenberg, S., Jones, S., McKenzie, B., Moyle, M. Improving Web Page Revisitation: Analysis, Design, and Evaluation. Information Technology and Society, 3(1), 2003, 159--183.Google Scholar
- Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B. What Do Web Users Do? An Empirical Analysis of Web Use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(6), 2001, 903--922. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B., Jason-Smith, M. Pushing Back: Evaluating a New Behaviour for the Back and Forward Buttons in Web Browsers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 57(5), 2002, 397--414. Google ScholarDigital Library
- comScore Media Metrix. Surfing Down Memory Lane to January 1996: comScore Media Metrix Revisits First-Ever Web Site Rankings. February 25, 2004 http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=434Google Scholar
- Conklin, J. Hypertext: A survey and introduction, IEEE Computer, 20(9), 1987, 17--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cooley, R., Mobasher, B. & Srivastava, J. Data Preparation for Mining World Wide Web Browsing Patterns. Knowledge and Information Systems 1, 1999.Google Scholar
- Abrams, D., Baecker, R., Chignell, M. Information archiving with bookmarks: personal webspace construction and organization. In Proc. CHI'98, ACM Press, (1998), 41--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Danielson, D. Web navigation and the behavioral effects of constantly visible site maps. In Interacting with Computers, 14(5), 2002, 601--618.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guy, M., Tonkin, E. Folksonomies: Tidying up Tags? In D-Lib Magazine, 12(1), 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Halasz, F.G. Reflections on Notecards: Seven Issues for the Next Generation of Hypertext Systems. In Communications of the ACM, 31(7), 1988, 836--852. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harris Interactive. More Than Four in Ten Internet Users Now Have Broadband -- Doubled in Two Years. Poll #63, 8.9.2004, http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=492Google Scholar
- Heer, J., Chi, E.H. Separating the Swarm: Categorization Methods for User Access Sessions on the Web. In Proc. CHI2002, ACM Press (2002), 243--250. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hilbert, D.M., Redmiles, D.F. Extracting usability information from user interface events. ACM Computing Surveys 32, 4 (2000), 384--421. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Internet Systems Consortium. ISC Internet Domain Survey 2005, http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/ops/ds/Google Scholar
- Jansen, B.J., Pooch, U.W. A Review of Web Searching Studies and a Framework for Future Research." In Journal of the American Society of Information Science 52(3), 2000, 235--246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jones, W., Bruce, H., Dumais, S. Keeping found things found on the Web. In Proc. CIKM'01, ACM Press (2001), 119--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jones, W., S. Dumais, et al. Once Found, What Then?: A Study of "Keeping" Behaviors in Personal Use of Web Information. In ASIST 2002, 39, 1 (2002), 391--402.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, B., Cockburn, A. An Empirical Analysis of Web Page Revisitation. In Proc. HICSS'01, 2001, 501--509. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Milic-Frailing, N., Jones, R., Rodder, K., Smyth, G., Blackwell, A., Sommerer, R. Smartback: supporting users in back navigation. Proc. WWW'04, ACM Press (2004), 63--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mozilla Project. Mozilla Firefox browser, 2006. http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/Google Scholar
- Obendorf, H., Weinreich, H., Hass, T. Automatic Support for Web User Studies with SCONE and TEA. In Ext. Abstracts CHI'04, ACM Press (2004), 1135--1138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pitkow, J. 4th GVU WWW User Survey, 1995. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey-10-1995Google Scholar
- Pitkow, J.E. Summary of WWW Characterizations. In World Wide Web, 2, 1--2 (1999), 3--13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reeder, R., Pirolli, P., Card, S.K. Web-Logger: A data collections tool for Web-use studies. UIR Technical report UIR-R-2000-06, Xerox PARC, 2000.Google Scholar
- Spiliopoulou, M., Mobasher, B., Berendt, B. and Naka-gawa, M. A Framework for the Evaluation of Session Reconstruction Heuristics in Web-Usage Analysis. INFORMS J. on Computing 15 (2), 2003, 171--190. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tauscher, L. and Greenberg, S. How People Revisit Web Pages: Empirical Findings and Implications for the Design of History Systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47(1), 1997, 97--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tauscher, L. Evaluating History Mechanisms: An Empirical Study of Reuse Patterns in WWW Navigation, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Calgary, 1996.Google Scholar
- Weinreich, H. and Lamersdorf, W. Concepts for Improved Visualization of Web Link Attributes. In Computer Networks, 33 (2000), 403--416. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., Herder, E. Data Cleaning Methods for Client and Proxy Logs. In WWW 2006 Workshops: Logging Traces of Web Activity, 2006.Google Scholar
- Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., Herder, H., Mayer, M. Off the Beaten Tracks: Exploring Three Aspects of Web Navigation. In WWW 2006, ACM Press (2006), 133--142. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., Mayer, M., Herder, E. Der Wandel in der Benutzung des World Wide Webs. In Mensch und Computer 2006, Oldenbourg (2006), 155--164.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Web page revisitation revisited: implications of a long-term click-stream study of browser usage
Recommendations
Large scale analysis of web revisitation patterns
CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOur work examines Web revisitation patterns. Everybody revisits Web pages, but their reasons for doing so can differ depending on the particular Web page, their topic of interest, and their intent. To characterize how people revisit Web content, we ...
Not quite the average: An empirical study of Web use
In the past decade, the World Wide Web has been subject to dramatic changes. Web sites have evolved from static information resources to dynamic and interactive applications that are used for a broad scope of activities on a daily basis. To examine the ...
A study of tabbed browsing among mozilla firefox users
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe present a study which investigated how and why users of Mozilla Firefox use multiple tabs and windows during web browsing. The detailed web browsing usage of 21 participants was logged over a period of 13 to 21 days each, and was supplemented by ...
Comments