Article

Triangulating communication design: emerging models for theory and practice

Author:

Brad MehlenbacherAuthors Info & Claims

SIGDOC '07: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication

Pages 87 - 94

https://doi.org/10.1145/1297144.1297164

Published: 22 October 2007 Publication History

Abstract

This paper describes the enduring dichotomy between what is defined as science and what is defined as non-science, and shows how this dichotomy serves as a backdrop for current divisions between theory and practice. The canonical concept of invention and contemporary interest in problem setting highlight the similarities between the activities of theoreticians and practitioners and inform the development of a useful definition of rhetorical or communication design. While recent developments in activity-, work-, and ecologically-centered design provide a powerful metaphor for contextualizing communication design work, a tentative argument is made for attending to emerging opportunities and challenges related to distributed space and time.

References

[1]

Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26 (4), 512--529.

[2]

Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29, 11--13.

[3]

Avital, M. (2000). Dealing with time in social inquiry: A tension between method and lived experience. Organization Science, 11 (6), 665--673.

Digital Library

[4]

Barab, S. A., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Curriculum-based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35 (5), 3--13.

[5]

Barab, S. A., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 1--14.

[6]

Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: U of Wisconsin P.

[7]

Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29 (1), 3--12.

[8]

Bødker, S. (1991). Through the interface: A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Digital Library

[9]

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2), 141--178.

[10]

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8 (2), 5--21.

[11]

Buchanan, R. (1995). Rhetoric, humanism, and design. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp. 23--66). Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P.

[12]

Buchanan, R. (2001). Design and the new rhetoric: Productive arts in the philosophy of culture. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 34 (3), 183--206.

[13]

Buchanan, R., & Margolin, V. (Eds.). (1995). Discovering design: Explorations in design studies. Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P.

[14]

Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Digital Library

[15]

Cole, M., & Engeströöm, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1--46). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.

[16]

Collins, A. (1996). Design issues for learning environments. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, and H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 347--361). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[17]

Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczye, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 (1), 15--42.

[18]

Cooper, G., & Bowers, J. (1995). Representing the user: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction. In P. J. Thomas (Ed.), The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces (pp. 48--66). Cambridge, England. Cambridge UP.

Digital Library

[19]

Cross, N. (1995). Discovering design ability. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp. 105--120). Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P.

[20]

Czubaroff, J. (1997). The public dimension of scientific controversies. Argumentation, 11, 51--74.

[21]

Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences 11 (1), 105--121.

[22]

Ehn, P. (1988). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Digital Library

[23]

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamääki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19--38). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.

[24]

Evans, V. (2004). The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

[25]

Fahnestock, J. (2005). Rhetoric in the age of cognitive science. In R. Graff, A. E. Walzer, & J. M. Atwill (Eds.), The viability of the rhetorical tradition (pp. 159--179). Albany, NY: State U of NY.

[26]

Fleming, D. (2003). Becoming rhetorical: An education in the topics. In J. Petraglia & D. Bahri (Eds.), The realms of rhetoric: The prospects for rhetoric education (pp. 93--116). NY, NY: SUNY P.

[27]

Gay, G., & Hembrooke, H. (2004). Activity-centered design: An ecological approach to designing smart tools and usable systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT P.

Digital Library

[28]

Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48 (6), 781--795.

[29]

Grabinger, S. (2004). Design lessons for social education. In T. M. Duffy & J. R. Kirkley (Eds.), Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases from higher education (pp. 49--60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[30]

Harpine, W. D. (2004). Is Modernism really modern? Uncovering a fallacy in Postmodernism. Argumentation, 18 (3), 349--358.

[31]

Hart-Davidson, W., Spinuzzi, C., & Zachry, M. (2006). Visualizing writing activity as knowledge work: Challenges and opportunities. SIGDOC'06: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication. NY, NY: ACM, 70--77.

Digital Library

[32]

Heidegger, M. (1968). What is called thinking? J. G. Gray (Trans.). NY, NY: Harper and Row.

[33]

Jablokow, K. W. (2005). The catalytic nature of science: Implications for scientific problem solving in the 21st century. Technology in Society, 27 (4), 531--549.

[34]

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.

Digital Library

[35]

Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., & Macaulay, C. (1999). The activity checklist: A tool for representing the "space" of context. Interactions, 6 (4), 27--39.

Digital Library

[36]

King, J. L., & Frost, R. L. (2002). Managing distance over time: The evolution of technologies of dis/ambiguation. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 3--26). Cambridge, MA: MIT P.

[37]

Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse: The aims of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

[38]

Koumi, J. (2005). Pedagogic design guidelines for multimedia materials: A mismatch between intuitive practitioners and experimental researchers. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, II. Available online: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2005/Jack_Koumi.htm

[39]

Latour, B. (1988). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.

[40]

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London, England: Sage.

[41]

Levy, P. (2003). A methodological framework for practice-based research in networked learning. Instructional Science, 31, 87--109.

[42]

Manzini, E. (1995). Prometheus of the everyday: The ecology of the artificial and the designer's responsibility. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design: Explorations in design studies (pp. 219--243). Chicago, IL: U of Chicago P.

[43]

Mehlenbacher, B., Bennett, L., Bird, T., Ivey, M., Lucas, J., Morton, J., & Whitman, L. (2005). Usable e-learning: A conceptual model for evaluation and design. Proceedings of HCI International 2005: 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 4 - Theories, Models, and Processes in HCI. Las Vegas: NV: Mira Digital P, 1--10.

[44]

Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40 (6), 610--617.

[45]

Moran, T. P., Cozzi, A., & Farrell, S. P. (2005). Unified activity management: Supporting people in e-business. Communications of the ACM, 48 (12), 67--70.

Digital Library

[46]

Nardi, B. A., & O'Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technologies with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT P.

Digital Library

[47]

Norman, D. A., & Spohrer, J. C. (1996). Learner-centered education. Communication of the ACM, 39 (4), 24--27.

Digital Library

[48]

Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47--87). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.

[49]

Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88--110). Cambridge, England: Cambridge UP.

[50]

Petroski, H. (1982). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. NY, NY: St. Martin's P.

[51]

Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18 (4), 599--620.

[52]

Powell, W. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2002). The new world of knowledge production in the life sciences. In S. Brint (Ed.), The future of the city of intellect: The changing American university (pp. 107--130). Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.

[53]

Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour and Information Technology, 20 (5), 347--356.

[54]

Quinn, C. N., & Wild, M. (1998). Supporting cognitive design: Lessons form human-computer interaction and computer-mediated learning. Education and Information Technologies, 3, 175--185.

Digital Library

[55]

Rowland, G. (2004). Shall we dance? A design epistemology for organizational learning and performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (1), 33--48.

[56]

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NY, NY: Basic.

[57]

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[58]

Simon, H. A. (1969, 1981). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT P.

Digital Library

[59]

Solomon, M. (2001). Is isn't the thought that counts. Argumentation, 15 (1), 67--75.

[60]

Soloway, E., Jackson, S. L., Klein, J., Quintana, C., Reed, J., Spitulnik, J., Stratford, S. J., Studer, S., Jul, S., Eng, J., & Scala, N. (1996). Learning theory in practice: Case studies of learner-centered design. CHI'96 Electronic Proceedings, April 17. Available online: http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi96/proceedings/papers/Soloway/es_txt.htm

Digital Library

[61]

Spinuzzi, C. (2002). Modeling genre ecologies. SIGDOC'02: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication. NY, NY: ACM, 200--207.

Digital Library

[62]

Spinuzzi, C. (2006). What do we need to teach about knowledge work? Computer Writing and Research Lab White Paper Series: #060925-1. Austin, TX: U of Texas at Austin. Available online: http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/node/962

[63]

Suchman, L. A. (1983). Office procedures as practical action: Models of work and system design. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1 (4), 320--328.

Digital Library

[64]

Tomasello, M. (1995). Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development, 10 (1), 131--156.

[65]

Turner, J. W., & Reinsch, Jr., N. L. (2007). The business communicator as presence allocator: Multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. Journal of Business Communication, 44 (1), 36--58.

[66]

van der Aalsvoort, G. M., & Harinck, F. J. H. (2000). Studying social interaction in instruction and learning: Methodological approaches and problems. In H. Cowie & G. M. van der Aalsvoort (Eds.), Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 5--20). Kidlington, Oxford: Elsevier Science.

[67]

Vera, A. H., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17 (1), 7--48.

[68]

Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide. First Monday, 7 (7). Available online: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_7/warschauer/index.html

[69]

Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Digital Library

Cited By

Stewart J(2017)Introduction Discussion Board Forums in Online Writing Courses Are EssentialHandbook of Research on Writing and Composing in the Age of MOOCs10.4018/978-1-5225-1718-4.ch018(294-316)Online publication date: 2017
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1718-4.ch018
McNely BRivers NGossett KMcNely BJones D(2014)All of the ThingsProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication CD-ROM10.1145/2666216.2666222(1-10)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2666216.2666222
Stewart JBaker NChaney SHashimov EImafuji EMcNely BRomano LZachry MSpinuzzi C(2012)A qualitative metasynthesis of activity theory in SIGDOC proceedings 2001-2011Proceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on Design of communication10.1145/2379057.2379120(341-348)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2379057.2379120
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Triangulating communication design: emerging models for theory and practice
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

This paper argues that a new paradigm for HCI research, which we label the 'practice' perspective, has been emerging in recent years. This stands in contrast to the prevailing mainstream HCI paradigm, which we term the 'interaction' perspective. The '...
Understanding interaction design practices
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

There is an undesirable gap between HCI research aimed at influencing interaction design practice and the practitioners in question. To close this gap, we advocate a theoretical and methodological focus on the day-to-day, lived experience of designers. ...
Beyond distributed representation: embodied cognition design supporting socio-sensorimotor couplings
TEI '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction

Embodied Cognition has been proposed as a relevant theory for tangible and embedded interaction [14]. Based on two 2-year lasting Research-through-Design cases we identify three variations of the theory: 1) Distributed Representation and Computation, 2) ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGDOC '07: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication

October 2007

286 pages

ISBN:9781595935885

DOI:10.1145/1297144

General Chair:
David Novick
The University of Texas at El Paso, TX
,
Program Chair:
Clay Spinuzzi
The University of Texas at Austin, TX

Copyright © 2007 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 October 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

SIGDOC07

Sponsor:

SIGDOC07: The 25th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication

October 22 - 24, 2007

Texas, El Paso, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 355 of 582 submissions, 61%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
369
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Stewart J(2017)Introduction Discussion Board Forums in Online Writing Courses Are EssentialHandbook of Research on Writing and Composing in the Age of MOOCs10.4018/978-1-5225-1718-4.ch018(294-316)Online publication date: 2017
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1718-4.ch018
McNely BRivers NGossett KMcNely BJones D(2014)All of the ThingsProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication CD-ROM10.1145/2666216.2666222(1-10)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2666216.2666222
Stewart JBaker NChaney SHashimov EImafuji EMcNely BRomano LZachry MSpinuzzi C(2012)A qualitative metasynthesis of activity theory in SIGDOC proceedings 2001-2011Proceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on Design of communication10.1145/2379057.2379120(341-348)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2379057.2379120
Teston CZachry MSpinuzzi C(2012)Investigating usability and "meaningful use" of electronic medical recordsProceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on Design of communication10.1145/2379057.2379101(227-232)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2379057.2379101
Spinuzzi C(2011)Losing by ExpandingJournal of Business and Technical Communication10.1177/105065191141104025:4(449-486)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2011
https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651911411040
Mehlenbacher BMehlenbacher BProtopsaltis AWilliams ASlattery S(2009)Multidisciplinarity and 21st century communication designProceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication10.1145/1621995.1622007(59-66)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1621995.1622007

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten