skip to main content
10.1145/1297144.1297190acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Narrative-based writing for coherent technical documents

Published: 22 October 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Narrative-based writing is a technique that was developed to address the lack of support for document coherence. The technique depends on the production of a story-like executive summary of the document called a DN (Document Narrative). This is then analysed using a discourse theory called Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) which helps further to correct any lapses in coherence in the DN before proceeding to use it to write the document. Previous papers have described the technique briefly, alongside discussions of the ongoing software development to incorporate narrative support in writing tools. It has now become apparent that the technique itself needs to be explained in greater detail. This is the purpose of this paper. Here, narrative-based writing and the reasoning behind it is described. This is followed by a description of a user experiment conducted in May 2006 to evaluate narrative-based writing and discover areas in which it could be improved. The positive feedback from the volunteers has motivated us to continue to refine and simplify the technique.

References

[1]
Abbott, H. P. The cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
[2]
De-Silva, N. A narrative-based collaborative writing tool for constructing coherent technical documents PhD thesis, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2007. (Available online at http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14313/).
[3]
De-Silva, N. and Henderson, P., Narrative Support for Technical Documents: Formalising Rhetorical Structure Theory. in 7th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), (Miami, FL, USA, 2005).
[4]
De-Silva, N. and Skaf-Molli, H., Narratives to preserve coherence in collaborative writing. in The Eighth International Workshop on Collaborative Editing Systems, (Banff, Canada, 2006).
[5]
Evans, D. and Gruba, P. How to write a better thesis. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, Australia, 2004.
[6]
Grosz, B. J., Weinstein, S. and Joshi, A. K. Centering: A framework for modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21 (2). 203--225.
[7]
Hobbs, J. R. Towards an understanding of coherence in discourse. in Lehnert, W. and Ringle, M. eds. Strategies for Natural Language Processing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey, 1982, 223--244.
[8]
Kieras, D. E. An Advanced Computerized Aid for the Writing of Comprehensible Technical Documents. in Britton, B. K. and Glynn, S. M. eds. Computer Writing Environments: Theory, Research and Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1989.
[9]
Knott, A. A Data-Driven Methodology for Motivating a Set of Coherence Relations Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, 1996.
[10]
Lothe, J. Narrative in Fiction and Film: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, USA, 2000.
[11]
Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A. and Lowry, M. R. Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41 (1). 66--99.
[12]
Mann, W. and Thompson, S. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organisation. Text, 8 (3). 243--281.
[13]
Mann, W. C., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. and Thompson, S. A. Rhetorical Structure Theory and Text Analysis. in Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. eds. Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising text, John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, 1992.
[14]
Minto, B. The pyramid principle. Pearson Education Limited, UK, 2002.
[15]
O'Donnell, M., RSTTool 2.4 - A markup tool for Rhetorical Structure Theory. in Proceedings, International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG'2000), (Mitzpe Ramon, Israel, 2000), 253--256.
[16]
Onega, S. and Landa, J. Introduction. in Onega, S. and Landa, J. eds. Narratology, Longman Group Ltd, New York and London, 1996.
[17]
Taboada, M. and Mann, W. C. Applications of Rhetorical Structure Theory. Discourse Studies, 8.
[18]
Tracey, J. R., Rugh, D. E. and Starkey, W. S. Sequential Thematic Organization of Publications (STOP): How to Achieve Coherence in Proposals and Reports. Journal of Computer Documentation, 23 (3). 4--68.
[19]
Winograd, T. Documentation, Interaction, and Conversation. The Journal of Computer Documentation, 23 (4). 3--6.
[20]
Zachry, M., Spinuzzi, C. and Hart-Davidson, W. Researching proposal development: accounting for the complexity of designing persuasive texts. Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Design of communication. 142--148.
[21]
Zobel, J. Writing for computer science. Springer, USA, 2004.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Improving Proposal Writing by Looking to Information OperationsJournal of Technical Writing and Communication10.1177/00472816241262231Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • (2016)A Leader-Driven Open Collaboration Platform for Exploring New DomainsProceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration10.1145/2957792.2957797(1-4)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2016
  • (2012)A process documentation model for DCMIProceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on Design of communication10.1145/2379057.2379111(289-294)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2012

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGDOC '07: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication
October 2007
286 pages
ISBN:9781595935885
DOI:10.1145/1297144
  • General Chair:
  • David Novick,
  • Program Chair:
  • Clay Spinuzzi
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 October 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. narratives
  2. rhetorical structure theory (rst)
  3. technical documentation

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGDOC07
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 355 of 582 submissions, 61%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Improving Proposal Writing by Looking to Information OperationsJournal of Technical Writing and Communication10.1177/00472816241262231Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • (2016)A Leader-Driven Open Collaboration Platform for Exploring New DomainsProceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration10.1145/2957792.2957797(1-4)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2016
  • (2012)A process documentation model for DCMIProceedings of the 30th ACM international conference on Design of communication10.1145/2379057.2379111(289-294)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2012

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media