skip to main content
10.1145/1297144.1297198acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Frozen ecstasy: visualizing hearing in marketing materials for cochlear implants

Published: 22 October 2007 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, I analyze marketing materials - principally brochures - from two cochlear implant manufacturers. Cochlear implants occupy a central place in the debates over deafness. Is deafness merely a medical condition that prevents deaf people from fully participating in the (hearing) society at large? Or is Deafness (written with a capital D) the moniker of a minority group, one with its own distinct language (e.g. American Sign Language), history, culture, and values, and thus deserving of the same civil rights afforded to other linguistic minorities? Because implants promise to eradicate deafness, they also threaten to undermine the claims of some deaf people to self-realization as members of a linguistic minority group. Not surprisingly, the marketing materials embrace a medical model of deafness as a stigmatizing deficit to be fixed. But they do so by downplaying the implant's uncertainty (i.e. implants to date can not deliver on the promise to cure deafness for all) and by ignoring the contests within the Deaf community over the place of implants in the lives of d/Deaf people.

References

[1]
Bauman, H.-Dirksen L. 2004. "Audism: Exploring the metaphysics of oppression". Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 9:2. 239--246
[2]
Baynton, Douglas (1996) Forbidden Signs: American Culture and the Campaign Against Sign Language. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
[3]
Branson, Jan & Don Miller. 2002. Damned for Their Difference: The Cultural Construction of Deaf People as Disabled. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press
[4]
Brueggemann, Brenda (1999) Lend Me Your Ear: Rhetorical Constructions of Deafness. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
[5]
Brueggemann, Brenda (2006) "Interlude 1: On (Almost) Passing" in L. Davis (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader (pp. 321--330). New York: Routledge.
[6]
Cochlear implant graphic. Official website of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). Retrieved 17 August 2007. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/ear_coch_img.htm
[7]
"Cochlear implants" (2006) Official website of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). NIH Publication No. 00-4798. Retrieved 17 August 2007. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/coch.asp.
[8]
"Cochlear implants FAQ" (n.d.) Official website of The National Association of the Deaf (NAD). Retrieved 17 August 2007. http://www.nad.org/site/pp.asp?c=foINKQMBF&b=399061.
[9]
Chorost, Michael (2005) Rebuilt: How Becoming Part Computer Made Me More Human. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
[10]
Bolt, Andrew (2002, March 25). "Deaf to oppression." Herald Sun (Melbourne, Australia). Opinion, 19.
[11]
"FDA Public Health Notification: Continued Risk of Bacterial Meningitis in Children with Cochlear Implants with a Positioner Beyond Twenty-Four Months Post-Implantation" (2006, February 6). Official website of U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 17 August 2007. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/020606-cochlear.html.
[12]
Gonsoulin, Thomas P. (2001) "Cochlear implant/Deaf World dispute: Different bottom elephants." Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 125:5. 552--556.
[13]
Griffin, Kawanza (2003, August 4) "Cochlear implants found to raise meningitis risk." Kawanza Griffin. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. 04G.
[14]
Davis, Vincent T. (2004, August 11) "Hers is resounding joy; 'Miracle' cochlear implant operation has opened world for 7-year-old girl." San Antonio Express-News. Metro, 1B.
[15]
Hintermair, Manfred & John A. Albertini (2005) "Ethics, deafness, and new medical technologies". Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10:2. 184--192
[16]
Lane, Harlan (1999) The Mask of Benevolence: Disabling the Deaf Community. 2nd ed. San Diego, Calif.: DawnSignPress.
[17]
NAD Position Statement on Cochlear Implants (2000) Official website of The National Association of the Deaf (NAD). Retrieved 17 August 2007. http://www.nad.org/site/pp.asp?c=foINKQMBF&b=138140.
[18]
Padden, Carol & Tom Humphries (2005) Inside Deaf Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
[19]
Sparrow, Robert (2005) "Defending Deaf Culture: The Case for Cochlear Implants." The Journal of Political Philosophy 13:2. 135--152.
[20]
"The Death of Deafness" (2000, March/April). Part 1. Hearing Health. 25--39.
[21]
Zdenek, Sean (solicited) "Bearing Witness to a Miracle: Cochlear Implants, News Discourse, and the Public Fascination with Curing Deafness," in B. Johnstone & C. Eisenhart (eds) Rhetoric in Detail: Discourse Analysis of Rhetorical Talk and Text.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Dynamic design for technical communicationProceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication10.1145/3328020.3353929(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2019
  • (2015)Pharmaceutical companies are writing the script for health consumerismCommunication Design Quarterly10.1145/2826972.28269763:4(35-49)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2015
  • (2015)An insider threat activity in a software security courseProceedings of the 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE.2015.7344087(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2015

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGDOC '07: Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication
October 2007
286 pages
ISBN:9781595935885
DOI:10.1145/1297144
  • General Chair:
  • David Novick,
  • Program Chair:
  • Clay Spinuzzi
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 October 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cochlear implants
  2. deaf studies
  3. discourse studies
  4. technical marketing communication
  5. visual rhetoric

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGDOC07
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 355 of 582 submissions, 61%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Dynamic design for technical communicationProceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication10.1145/3328020.3353929(1-7)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2019
  • (2015)Pharmaceutical companies are writing the script for health consumerismCommunication Design Quarterly10.1145/2826972.28269763:4(35-49)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2015
  • (2015)An insider threat activity in a software security courseProceedings of the 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE.2015.7344087(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2015

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media