skip to main content
10.1145/1316624.1316655acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Feedback for guiding reflection on teamwork practices

Published:04 November 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Effective communication in project teams is important, but not often taught. We explore how feedback might improve teamwork in a controlled experiment where groups interact through chat rooms. Collaborators who receive high feedback ratings use different language than poor collaborators (e.g. more words, fewer assents, and less affect-laden language). Further, feedback affects language use. This suggests that a system could use linguistic analysis to automatically provide and visualize feedback to teach teamwork. To this end, we present GroupMeter, a system that applies principles discovered in the experiment to provide feedback both from peers and from automated linguistic analysis.

References

  1. Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. NY: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bransford, J. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cho, K., Chung, R., King, W., & Schunn, C.D. (in press). Creating a peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement process. Communications of the ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. DiMicco, J. M., Pandolfo, A., & Bender, W. (2004). Influencing group participation with a shared display. Proc. CSCW'04. Chicago, Il. 614--623. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Foltz, P. W., & Martin, M.J. (2004). Automated team discourse annotation and performance prediction using LSA. Proc. HLT/NAACL, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Karahalios, K. G., & Bergstrom, T. (2006). Visualizing audio in group table conversation. Proc. IEEE TableTop 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Losada M., Sánchez, P., Noble, E. E. (1990). Collaborative technology and group process feedback: Their impact on interactive sequences in meetings. Proc. CSCW'90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count LIWC 2001. Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Roberts, T. S. (2005). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Idea Group Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Turner, B., & Schober, M. F (2007). Feedback on collaborative skills in remote studio design. HICSS 2007, 44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Feedback for guiding reflection on teamwork practices

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GROUP '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
        November 2007
        422 pages
        ISBN:9781595938459
        DOI:10.1145/1316624

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 November 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate125of405submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader