skip to main content
10.1145/1349822.1349844acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How training and experience affect the benefits of autonomy in a dirty-bomb experiment

Published: 12 March 2008 Publication History

Abstract

A dirty-bomb experiment conducted at the INL is used to evaluate the effectiveness and suitability of three different modes of robot control. The experiment uses three distinct user groups to understand how participants' background and training affect the way in which they use and benefit from autonomy. The results show that the target mode, which involves automated mapping and plume tracing together with a point and click tasking tool, provides the best performance for each group. This is true for objective performance such as source detection and localization accuracy as well as subjective measures such as perceived workload, frustration and preference. The best overall performance is achieved by the Explosive Ordinance Disposal group which has experience in both robot teleoperation and dirty bomb response. The user group that benefits least from autonomy is the Nuclear Engineers that have no experience with either robot operation or dirty bomb response. The group that benefits most from autonomy is the Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team that has extensive experience related to the task, but no robot training.

References

[1]
J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. Cocking (eds.). How People Learning: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, National Research Council, 1999. http://www.nap.edu/html/howpeople1/
[2]
D. J. Bruemmer, D. A. Few, R. L. Boring, J. L. Marble, M. C. Walton, and C. W. Nielsen. "Shared Understanding for Collaborative Control." IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A. Systems and Humans, vol. 35, no.4, pp. 505--512, Jul. 2005.
[3]
D. J. Bruemmer, D. I. Gertman, C. W. Nielsen, D. A. Few, W. D. Smart. "Supporting Complex Robot Behaviors with Simple Interaction Tools." Accepted for publication in Human Robot Interaction, ed. Nilanjan Sarkar, by Advanced Robotics Systems International, Vienna, Austria. 2007.
[4]
J. L. Burke, R. R. Murphy, E. Rogers, V. J. Lumelsky, and J.Scholtz, "Final report for the DARPA/NSF interdisciplinary study on human-robot interaction," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl.Rev., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 103--112, May 2004
[5]
K. Konolige. Large-scale map-making. In Proceedings of the National Conference on AI (AAAI), San Jose, CA, 2004.
[6]
M. LaFrance. "The quality of expertise: implications of expert-novice differences for knowledge acquisition," ACM SIGART Bulletin, vol. 108 pp. 6--14, 1989.
[7]
J. L. Marble, D. J. Bruemmer, D. A. Few. "Mixed-Initiative Control for Remote Characterization of Hazardous Environments," In Proc. of the 2004 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, January 2004.
[8]
C. W. Nielsen and M. A. Goodrich. Comparing the usefulness of video and map information in navigation tasks. In Proceedings of the 2006 Human-Robot Interaction Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, March 2006.
[9]
C. W. Nielsen and D. J. Bruemmer. "Hiding the system from the user: Moving from complex mental models to elegant metaphors," In Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro--man), Jeju Island, South Korea, August 2007.
[10]
J. Scholtz, "Human-robot interactions: Creating synergistic cyber forces," in Proc. Workshop Multi-Robot Syst., 2002, pp. 177--184.
[11]
B. Sellner, F. W. Heger, L. M. Hiatt, R. Simmons, and S. Singh, "Coordinated Multiagent Teams and Sliding Autonomy for Large-Scale Assembly,"Proceedings of the IEEE - Special Issue on Multi-Robot Systems, Vol. 94, No. 7, July, 2006, pp. 1425--1444.
[12]
H. A. Yanco, J. L. Drury, and J. Scholtz, "Beyond usability evaluation: Analysis of human-robot interaction at a major robotics competition," J. Human-Comput. Interaction, vol. 19, pp. 117--149, 2004.
[13]
B.J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk. (Eds.). Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Configuring Humans: What Roles Humans Play in HRI Research2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889496(478-492)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
  • (2021)Analysis of cognitive skill in a water discharge activity for firefighting robotsROBOMECH Journal10.1186/s40648-021-00201-98:1Online publication date: 14-Apr-2021
  • (2020)Analysis of firefighting skill with a teleoperated robotROBOMECH Journal10.1186/s40648-020-00177-y7:1Online publication date: 20-Jun-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. How training and experience affect the benefits of autonomy in a dirty-bomb experiment

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HRI '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
        March 2008
        402 pages
        ISBN:9781605580173
        DOI:10.1145/1349822
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 12 March 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. expert user
        2. human-robot interaction
        3. map-building
        4. seamless autonomy

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        HRI '08
        HRI '08: International Conference on Human Robot Interaction
        March 12 - 15, 2008
        Amsterdam, The Netherlands

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
        Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2022)Configuring Humans: What Roles Humans Play in HRI Research2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889496(478-492)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
        • (2021)Analysis of cognitive skill in a water discharge activity for firefighting robotsROBOMECH Journal10.1186/s40648-021-00201-98:1Online publication date: 14-Apr-2021
        • (2020)Analysis of firefighting skill with a teleoperated robotROBOMECH Journal10.1186/s40648-020-00177-y7:1Online publication date: 20-Jun-2020
        • (2019)Learning effects in variable autonomy human-robot systems: how much training is enough?2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC)10.1109/SMC.2019.8914558(720-727)Online publication date: Oct-2019
        • (2016)Experimental analysis of a variable autonomy framework for controlling a remotely operating mobile robot2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)10.1109/IROS.2016.7759527(3581-3588)Online publication date: Oct-2016
        • (2015)Towards the Principled Study of Variable Autonomy in Mobile Robots2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics10.1109/SMC.2015.190(1053-1059)Online publication date: Oct-2015
        • (2015)The Capabilities and Effectiveness of Remote Inspection of Wind TurbinesEnergy Procedia10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.42080(177-184)Online publication date: 2015
        • (2013)Teleoperation and Beyond for Assistive Humanoid RobotsReviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics10.1177/1557234X135024639:1(175-226)Online publication date: 23-Dec-2013
        • (2013)An Experiment on the Effectiveness of Remote, Robotic Inspection Compared to MannedProceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics10.1109/SMC.2013.395(2310-2315)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2013
        • (2012)Protection from Human Error: Guarded Motion Methodologies for Mobile RobotsIEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine10.1109/MRA.2012.222050019:4(36-47)Online publication date: Dec-2012
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media