skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357304acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life

Published: 06 April 2008 Publication History

Abstract

History repeatedly demonstrates that rural communities have unique technological needs. Yet, we know little about how rural communities use modern technologies, so we lack knowledge on how to design for them. To address this gap, our empirical paper investigates behavioral differences between more than 3,000 rural and urban social media users. Using a dataset collected from a broadly popular social network site, we analyze users' profiles, 340,000 online friendships and 200,000 interpersonal messages. Using social capital theory, we predict differences between rural and urban users and find strong evidence supporting our hypotheses. Namely, rural people articulate far fewer friends online, and those friends live much closer to home. Our results also indicate that the groups have substantially different gender distributions and use privacy features differently. We conclude by discussing design implications drawn from our findings; most importantly, designers should reconsider the binary friend-or-not model to allow for incremental trust-building.

Supplementary Material

index.html (index.html)
Slides from the presentation
ZIP File (p1603-slides.zip)
Supplemental material for The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life
Audio only (1357304.mp3)
Video (1357304.mp4)

References

[1]
Adamic, L.A. and Glance, N., The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog. LinkKDD: Workshop on Link Analysis, 2005.
[2]
Atwood, R.A. Telephony and Its Cultural Meanings in Southeastern Iowa. University of Iowa Press, 1984.
[3]
Baym, N.K. Interpersonal Life Online. In L.A. Liewvrouw & S. Livingstone eds. The Handbook of New Media. Sage, London, 2006.
[4]
Bell, P., Reddy, P. and Rainie, L. Rural Areas and the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life Project, February 2004.
[5]
boyd, d.m. Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. Extended abstracts CHI, 2004. 1279--1282.
[6]
Bradner, E. and Mark, G. Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception. Proc. CSCW, 2002. 226--235.
[7]
Carey, J. Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Routledge, New York, 1989.
[8]
Castells, M. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
[9]
Donath, J.S. Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community. In Kollock, P. and Smith, M. eds. Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge, London, 1998.
[10]
Donath, J. and boyd, d.m. Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22 (4). 71.
[11]
Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11 (2).
[12]
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4).
[13]
Falk, I. and Kilpatrick, S. What is Social Capital? A Study of Interaction in a Rural Community. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (1). 87--110.
[14]
Fischer, C.S. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. University of California Press, 1994.
[15]
Golder, S., Wilkinson, D. and Huberman, B.A., Rhythms of Social Interaction: Messaging within a Massive Online Network. Conference on Communities and Technologies (CT2007).
[16]
Granovetter, M. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6). 1360--1380.
[17]
Hamilton, L. Rural Voting in the 2004 Election, Carsey Institute: University of New Hampshire, 2006.
[18]
Hancock, J.T., Toma, C. and Ellison, N. The truth about lying in online dating profiles. Proc. CHI, 2007. 449--452.
[19]
Hart, G. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes (version 2.0), Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington, 2007.
[20]
Hitwise. MySpace Receives 79.7 Percent of Social Networking Visits. http://www.hitwise.com/press-center/hitwiseHS2004/socialnets.php. Accessed Jan. 10, 2008.
[21]
Horrigan, J. Online Communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties. Pew Internet & American Life Project, October 2001.
[22]
Horrigan, J. and Murray, K. Rural Broadband Internet use Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2006.
[23]
Isserman, A.M. Competitive Advantages of Rural America in the Next Century. International Regional Science Review, 24 (1). 38--58.
[24]
Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, New York, 1961.
[25]
Kline, R.R. Consumers in the Country: Technology and Social Change in Rural America. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.
[26]
Laherrere, J. and Sornette, D. Stretched Exponential Distributions in Nature and Economy: 'Fat Tails' with Characteristic Scales. European Physics Journals, B2: 525--539.
[27]
Lampe, C.A.C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C. A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network. Proc. CHI, 2007. 435--444.
[28]
Larson, K.A. The Social Construction of the Internet: A Rural Perspective. Department of Communication Studies, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 2007, 137.
[29]
Lenhart, A. and Madden, M. Social Networking Websites and Teens: An Overview. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2007.
[30]
Marx, L. The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. Oxford University Press, New York, 1964.
[31]
Norris, P. The Bridging and Bonding Role of Online Communities. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7 (3). 3--13.
[32]
Parker, E.B., Hudson, H.E., Dillman, D.A. and Roscoe, A.D. Rural America in the Information Age: Telecommunications Policy for Rural Development. University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 1989.
[33]
Portes, A. Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24 (1). 1--24.
[34]
Resnick, P. Beyond Bowling Together: Sociotechnical Capital. In Carroll, J. ed. HCI in the New Millennium. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 2001.
[35]
Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, 1995.
[36]
Toffler, A. The Third Wave. William Morrow, New York, 1981.
[37]
Umble, D.Z. The coming of the telephone to plain country: A study of Amish and Mennonite resistance in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania at the turn of the century. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1991.
[38]
University of Maine. Maine Rural Partners: http://www.mainerural.org. Accessed Jan. 10, 2008.
[39]
U.S. Census Bureau. Summary File 1 (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3), 2000.
[40]
U.S. Census Bureau. Urban and Rural Definitions, U.S. Census Bureau, 1995.
[41]
Wellman, B., Haase, A.Q., Witte, J. and Hampton, K. Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3). 436.
[42]
Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Isla, I.D.d. and Miyata, K. The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8 (3).
[43]
Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M. and Haythornthwaite, C. Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22. 213--238.
[44]
Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill, W. and Cherny, L. The dynamics of mass interaction. Proc. CSCW, 1998. 257--264.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Socio-digital Rural Resilience: An Exploration of Information Infrastructures Within and Across Rural Villages During Covid-19Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374008:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Networks and identity drive the spatial diffusion of linguistic innovation in urban and rural areasnpj Complexity10.1038/s44260-024-00009-91:1Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
  • (2022)Social Networks and AnalyticsEncyclopedia of Data Science and Machine Learning10.4018/978-1-7998-9220-5.ch152(2528-2538)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Guang Yang

    With so much press focusing on how online social networks and media have changed everyday life in New York and San Francisco, it is easy to forget that everyone, not just city dwellers, can benefit from new technology. Rural communities have been an active part of the booming social media phenomenon in the past few years, but, until recently, their unique characteristics have been largely neglected in the literature. This paper studies thousands of urban and rural users on MySpace, one of the largest online social networks worldwide. Specifically, Gilbert et al. compare user attributes, such as number of friends, their geographical distribution, interaction among friends (for example, comments), strong/weak ties, and privacy settings. As one would expect, rural users have, in general, fewer online friends and they live closer to the subject. There is also a higher percentage of rural female users compared to their urban counterparts, as "women are the guardians of Internet knowledge in rural communities." Not surprising, either, is the finding that rural users set their profiles to the private mode more often, showing stronger concerns about online privacy. However, it may seem counter-intuitive that no evidence shows that rural users prefer strong ties more than urban users do-they both maintain about the same percentages of strong and weak ties in social relationships. This paper is among the first to carry out a serious study of social media use in rural areas. Through convincing real-life data, it confirms several previous hypotheses and questions others. It also brings up interesting discussions, such as how social networks may play a role in a politically divided nation. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2008
    1870 pages
    ISBN:9781605580111
    DOI:10.1145/1357054
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 April 2008

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. digital divide
    2. rural
    3. social media
    4. social network sites

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '08
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 157 of 714 submissions, 22%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)76
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Socio-digital Rural Resilience: An Exploration of Information Infrastructures Within and Across Rural Villages During Covid-19Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36374008:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Networks and identity drive the spatial diffusion of linguistic innovation in urban and rural areasnpj Complexity10.1038/s44260-024-00009-91:1Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
    • (2022)Social Networks and AnalyticsEncyclopedia of Data Science and Machine Learning10.4018/978-1-7998-9220-5.ch152(2528-2538)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Digital Storytelling for Developing Computer Skills in Rural AppalachiaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556216:CSCW2(1-22)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Examining Source Effects on Perceptions of Fake News in Rural IndiaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129366:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Addressing Digital Divides in Rural Appalachia with Digital Literacy EducationCompanion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3500868.3561404(255-258)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Dare to Dream, Dare to Livestream: How E-Commerce Livestreaming Empowers Chinese Rural WomenProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517634(1-13)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Beyond Virtual Bazaar: How Social Commerce Promotes Inclusivity for the Traditionally Underserved Community in Chinese Developing RegionsProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517487(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2022)The effect of perceived financial risk on purchase intention in PakistanInternational Journal of Emerging Markets10.1108/IJOEM-01-2022-000119:6(1473-1491)Online publication date: 6-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Inferring Tie Strength in Temporal NetworksMachine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases10.1007/978-3-031-26390-3_5(69-85)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media