Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design

ABSTRACT

The design, development, and deployment of interactive systems can substantively impact individuals, society, and the natural environment, now and potentially well into the future. Yet, a scarcity of methods exists to support long-term, emergent, systemic thinking in interactive design practice. Toward addressing this gap, we propose four envisioning criteria --- stakeholders, time, values, and pervasiveness -- distilled from prior work in urban planning, design noir, and Value Sensitive Design. We characterize how the criteria can support systemic thinking, illustrate the integration of the envisioning criteria into established design practice (scenariobased design), and provide strategic activities to serve as generative envisioning tools. We conclude with suggestions for use and future work. Key contributions include: 1) four envisioning criteria to support systemic thinking, 2) value scenarios (extending scenario-based design), and 3) strategic activities for engaging the envisioning criteria in interactive system design practice.

References

1. Intelligent Robotics and Communication Laboratory.
2. Archibold, R. C. 2007. Racial hate feeds a gang war's senseless killing. The New York Times (January 17, 2007).
3. Arendt, H. 1958. The human condition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. Beveridge, C. E. 2002. Olmstead: His essential theory. Nineteenth Century, 20, 2, 32--37.
5. Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design: Invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. 2007. In Proceedings of CHI '07 (San Jose, CA). ACM Press, 503--512.
6. Blythe, M. A., and Wright, P. C. (2006). Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centered design. Interacting with Computers, 18, 5 (Sep., 2006), 1139--1164.
7. Borning, A., Friedman, B., Davis, J., and Lin, P. (2005). Informing public deliberation: Value Sensitive Design of indicators for a large-scale urban simulation. In Proceedings of ECSCW '05 (Paris, France), Springer-Verlag, 2005, 449--468.
8. Briggs, J. L. 1970. Never in anger: Portrait of an Eskimo family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Djajadiningrat, J. P., Gaver, W. W., and Fres, J. W. Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: Methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. In Proceedings of DIS '00 (Brooklyn, New York, 2000). ACM Press, 2000, 66--71.
10. Dubos, R. 1980. Man adapting. Yale University Press, New Haven.
11. Dunne, A. 2005. Hertzian tales. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Dunne, A., and Raby, F. 2001. Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. August Media, Boston.
13. Dzida, W., and Freitag, R. 1998. Making use of scenarios for validating analysis and design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24, 12, 1182--1196.
14. Faiks, S., Kest, J., Szot, A., and Vendura, M. 2001. Revisiting riverside: A Frederick Law Olmsted community. Master's Thesis, University of Michigan.
15. Fischer, C. S. 1992. America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. University of California Press, Berkeley.
16. Friedman, B. Human values and the design of computer technology. Cambridge University Press and CSLI, Stanford University, New York, 1997.
17. Friedman, B. Social judgments and technological innovation: Adolescents' conceptions of computer property, privacy, and electronic information. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 3 (1997), 327--351.
18. Friedman, B., Freier, N. G., and Kahn, P. H., Jr. Office windows of the future? -- Two case studies of an augmented window. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of CHI '04 (Vienna, Austria). ACM Press, 2004.
19. Friedman, B., and Kahn, P. H., Jr. Human agency and responsible computing: Implications for computer system design. Journal of Systems and Software, 17, 1 (1992), 7--14.
20. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., Hagman, J., Severson, R. L., and Gill, B. The Watcher and the watched: Social judgments about privacy in a public place. Human-Computer Interaction, 21, 2 (2006), 235--272.
21. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Borning, A. Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In P. Zhang and D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-Computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations. M. E. Sharpe, NY, 2006, 348--372.
22. Friedman, B., and Nissenbaum, H. Software agents and user autonomy. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents '07 (New York). ACM Press, 1997, 466--469.
23. Friedman, B., Smith, I. E., Kahn, P. H., Jr., Consolvo, S., and Selawski, J. Development of a privacy addendum for open source licenses: Value Sensitive Design in industry. In Proceedings of UbiComp'06 (Orange County, California). Springer-Verlag, 2006, 194--211.
24. Grossman, E. High tech trash: Digital devices, hidden toxics, and human health. Island Press, Washington, 2006.
25. Hendry, D. G. Communication functions and the adaptation of design representations in interdisciplinary teams. In Proceedings of DIS '04 (Cambridge, MA). ACM Press, 2004, 123--132.
26. Kahn, P. H., Jr., Friedman, B., Gill, B., Hagman, J., Severson, R. L., Freier, N. G., Feldman, E. N., Carrere, S., and Stolyar, A. A plasma display window? The shifting baseline problem in a technologically-mediated natural world. Journal of Environmental Psychology (in press).
27. Kahn, P. H., Jr., Friedman, B., Pérez-Granados, D. R., and Freier, N. G. Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies, 7, 3 (2006), 405--436.
28. Kahn, P. H., Jr., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., and Kanda, T. What is a human? -- Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on ROMAN '06 (Hatfield, U.K). IEEE, 2006, 364--371.
29. Knaus, W. A. APACHE 1978--2001: The development of a quality assurance system based on prognosis: Milestones and personal reflections. Archives of Surgery, 137(2002), 37--41.
30. Mensel, R. E. "Kodakers lying in wait": Amateur photography and the right of privacy in New York, 1885--1915. American Quarterly, 43, 1 (1991), 24--45.
31. Miller, J. K., Friedman, B., Jancke, G., and Gill, B. Value tensions in design: The Value Sensitive Design, development, and appropriation of a corporation's groupware system. In Proceedings of GROUP '07 (Sanibel Island, FL). ACM Press, 2007.
32. Nathan, L. P., Klasnja, P. V., & Friedman, B. Value scenarios: A technique for envisioning systemic effects of new technologies. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of CHI '07 (San Jose, CA). ACM Press, 2007, 2585--2590.
33. Nathan, L. P., Miller, J. K., & Friedman, B. SafetyNet: Safety in the city at what cost? 2006. Proceedings of the Exurban Noir Workshop, Ubicomp '06 (Orange County, CA). http://drzaius.ics.uci.edu/meta/exurban-noir/. 46--49.
34. Rittel, H. W. J., and Webber, M., M. Planning problems are wicked problems. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984, 135--144.
35. Rizzo, A., and Bagcigalupo. Scenarios: Heuristics for action. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Economics '04 (York, United Kingdom), 2004, 153--160.
36. Ross, R. Robot links sick kids back to school: U.S. hospitals opt for remote-control monitor developed by Toronto team. Toronto Star, Toronto, Canada, 2002.
37. Rosson, M. B., and Carroll, J. M. Scenario-based design. In J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2003, 1032--1050.
38. Schön, D. A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Maurice Temple Smith Ltd, London, 1983.
39. Taylor, N. Urban planning theory since 1945. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.
40. Wiener, N. Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1948/1961.
41. Wolf, T. V., Rode, J. A., Sussman, J., and Kellogg, W. A. Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI. In Proceedings of SIGCHI '06 (Montreal, Canada). ACM Press, 2006, 521--530.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Computing / technology policy