skip to main content
10.1145/1462027.1462035acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effect of screen configuration and interaction devices in shared display groupware

Published: 31 October 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Interactive tabletop and wall surfaces support collaboration and interactivity in novel ways. Apart from keyboards and mice, such systems can also incorporate other input devices, namely laser pointers, marker pens with screen location sensors, or touch-sensitive surfaces. Similarly, instead of a vertically positioned desktop monitor, collaborative setups typically use much larger displays, which are oriented either vertically (wall) or horizontally (tabletop), or combine both kinds of surfaces.
In this paper we describe an empirical study that investigates how technical system constraints can affect group performance in high pace collaborative tasks. For this, we compare various input and output modalities in a system that consists of several interactive tabletop and wall surface(s). We observed that the performance of a group of people scaled almost linearly with the number of participants on an almost perfectly parallel task. We also found that mice were significantly faster than laser pointers, but only by 21%. Also, interaction on walls was significantly faster than on the tabletop, by 51%.

References

[1]
Ahlborn, B.A., Thompson, D., Kreylos, O., Hamann, B., and Staadt, O.G. 2005. A practical system for laser pointer interaction on large displays. In Proceedings of VRST '05. ACM, New York, NY, 106--109.
[2]
Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I.S., (2002). Changes in applied force to a touchpad during pointing tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 29, 171--182.
[3]
Becerik, B., Pollalis, S. Computer aided collaboration in managing construction. Cambridge: Harvard Design School. Department of Architecture, 2006.
[4]
CPNMouse: Multiple Mice in Windows. http://cpnmouse.source-forge.net/
[5]
Deitz, P. and Leigh, D. (2001), DiamondTouch: A Multi-User Touch Technology. Proc. UIST 2001: ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 219--226.
[6]
Douglas, S.A, Kirkpatrick, A.E., & MacKenzie, I.S. Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241. Proceedings of CHI '99, pp. 215--222.
[7]
Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., and Balakrishnan, R. 2007. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of CHI'07. ACM, New York, NY, 647--656.
[8]
Guiard, Y., Chapuis, O., Du, Y., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. 2006. Allowing camera tilts for document navigation in the standard GUI: a discussion and an experiment. In Proceedings AVI'06. ACM, New York, NY, 241--244.
[9]
Ha, V., Inkpen, K.M, Mandryk, R.L., and Whalen, T. Direct intentions: the effects of input devices on collaboration around a tabletop display. In TableTop 2006, Jan. 2006.
[10]
Hawkey, K., Kellar, M., Reilly, D., Whalen, T., and Inkpen, K.M.(2005) The Proximity Factor: Impact of Distance on Co-located Collaboration. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP). Sanibel Island, FL, USA, November 2005, 31--40.
[11]
Inkpen, K.M., Hawkey, K., Kellar, M., Mandryk, R.L., Parker, J.K., Reilly, D., Scott, S.D. & Whalen, T. (2005). Exploring Display Factors that Influence Co-Located Collaboration: Angle, Size, Number, and User Arrangement. Proceedings of HCI International 2005. Las Vegas, USA, July 2005.
[12]
ISO ISO/TC 159/SC4/WG3 N147: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -- Part 9 -- Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, International Organisation for Standardisation, May 25, 1998.
[13]
Myers, B.A., Bhatnagar, R., Nichols, J., Peck, C.H., Kong, D., Miller, R., and Long, A.C. 2002. Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices. In Proceedings of CHI'02. ACM Press, New York, NY, 33--40.
[14]
Oh, J.-Y., Stuerzlinger, W. (2002). Laser Pointers as Collaborative Pointing Devices, Graphics Interface 2002, Eds. Stürzlinger, McCool, AK Peters and CHCCS, ISSN 0713-5424, 141--149.
[15]
Olsen, D.R. and Nielsen, T. 2001. Laser pointer interaction. In Proceedings of CHI'01. ACM, New York, NY, 17--22.
[16]
Parker, J.K., Mandryk, R.L., and Inkpen, K.M. 2005. TractorBeam: seamless integration of local and remote pointing for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of Graphics interface 2005 (Victoria, British Columbia, May 09-11, 2005), 33--40.
[17]
Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger W. Laser Pointers as Interaction Devices for Collaborative Pervasive Computing, Advances in Pervasive Computing 2004, Eds. Ferscha, Hoertner, Kotsis, OCG, ISBN 385403176-9, 315--320.
[18]
Rogers, Y., Lindley, S. Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interacting with Computers Volume 16, Issue 6, December 2004, 1133--1152 .
[19]
Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., and Morris, M.R. 2004. Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. In Proceedings CSCW '04. ACM, New York, NY, 284--293.
[20]
Scott, S.D., Grant, K.D., & Mandryk, R.L. (2003). System Guidelines for Co-locarted, Collaborative Work on Tabletop Display. Proc. ECSCW'03, European Conference Computer-Supported Corporative Work 2003. Helsinki, Finland, September 14-18, 2003.
[21]
Shizuki, B., Hisamatsu, T., Takahashi, S., and Tanaka, J. 2006. Laser pointer interaction techniques using peripheral areas of screens. In Proceedings of AVI '06. ACM, New York, NY, 95--98.
[22]
Stuerzlinger, W., Zaman, L., Pavlovych, A., Oh, J.-Y. (2006). The Design and Realization of CoViD, A System for Collaborative Virtual 3D Design, Virtual Reality, 10(2), 135--147, Oct 2006.
[23]
Vogt, F., Wong, J., Fels, S. and Cavens, D. Tracking multiple laser pointers for large screen interaction. Extended Abstracts of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST2003), 2003, pp. 95--96.
[24]
Wigdor, D., Shen, C., Forlines, C., Balakrishnan, R. (2006). Effects of display position and control space orientation on user preference and performance. Proceedings of the 2006 CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 309--318.
[25]
Wigdor, D., Shen, C., Forlines, C., and Balakrishnan, R. 2007. Perception of elementary graphical elements in tabletop and multi-surface environments. In Proceedings of CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 473--482.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)When Is Moving a Cursor With a Computer Mouse Intuitive?Perception10.1177/030100662091515249:4(484-487)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2020
  • (2018)Comparing a Single-Touch Whiteboard and a Multi-Touch Tabletop for Collaboration in School Museum VisitsProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/31917382:1(1-23)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2018
  • (2014)The effects of whole-class interactive instruction with Single Display Groupware for TrianglesComputers & Education10.5555/2753872.275390370:C(203-211)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HCC '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on Human-centered computing
October 2008
84 pages
ISBN:9781605583204
DOI:10.1145/1462027
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 October 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cscw
  2. interactive walls
  3. laser pointers
  4. tabletops

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MM08
Sponsor:
MM08: ACM Multimedia Conference 2008
October 31, 2008
British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 48 of 81 submissions, 59%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)When Is Moving a Cursor With a Computer Mouse Intuitive?Perception10.1177/030100662091515249:4(484-487)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2020
  • (2018)Comparing a Single-Touch Whiteboard and a Multi-Touch Tabletop for Collaboration in School Museum VisitsProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/31917382:1(1-23)Online publication date: 26-Mar-2018
  • (2014)The effects of whole-class interactive instruction with Single Display Groupware for TrianglesComputers & Education10.5555/2753872.275390370:C(203-211)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2014
  • (2013)A pre-experiment on effects of horizontal and vertical touch displays on group work in card classification tasks2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom)10.1109/CogInfoCom.2013.6719235(173-178)Online publication date: Dec-2013
  • (2012)Comparing horizontal and vertical surfaces for a collaborative design taskAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction10.1155/2012/1376862012(6-6)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012
  • (2012)Interaction Design for Multi-touch Interactive WallsProceedings of the 2012 Second International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application10.1109/ISdea.2012.596(310-313)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2012
  • (2011)Collaboration within large groups in the classroomInternational Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning10.1007/s11412-011-9123-y6:4(561-575)Online publication date: 8-Jun-2011

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media