skip to main content
10.1145/1463160.1463167acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interaction design and the critics: what to make of the "weegie"

Published:20 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the development and evaluation of "weegie" an audio-photography desk featuring sounds and images inspired by the Govan area of Glasgow. It was intended to be an interactive artwork that would challenge negative preconceptions about the area. The paper describes two techniques used to consider the extent to which the piece achieved these aims. The first technique is the "personal meaning map" and taken from museum studies. The second is cultural critique drawn from the arts. Building on Gaver's [24] strategy of using cultural commentators for 'polyphonic' assessment it considers the extent to which perspectives drawn from the humanities and the arts can be useful in evaluating design. It argues that a more rigorous understanding of critical theory is necessary to the development of interaction design criticism.

References

  1. Agre P. (1997) Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI in Bowker, G., Star, S., Turner, W., and Gasser, L., eds, Social Science, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, Erlbaum, 1997Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakhtin M. M., (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Ed and trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis, University of Michigan Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardzell J., Churchill E., (2007) From HCI to Media Experience: Methodological Implications. Proceedings of HCI 2007 Lancaster, UK Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barthes R., (1961) The Photographic Message. A Barthes Reader, edited by Susan Sontag. Hill and Wang New York 1982Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, J. (1978) Uses of Photography in John Berger Selected Essays. Edited by Geoff Dyer. Bloomsbury 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleasdale A. (1990) Boys from the Blackstuff. Studio Scripts. Edited by David Self. 1990 Stanley Thornes Ltd CheltenhamGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Blythe M. Reid J., Wright P. and Geelhoed E. (2006) Interdisciplinary Criticism: Analysing The Experience Of Riot! A Location Sensitive Digital Narrative. Behavior and Information Technology Volume 25, Number 2, Number 2/March-April 2006, pp. 127--139Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Blythe, M. A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A. F., & Wright, P. C (2003) Eds. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment Kluwer, Dordrecht Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Blythe M. (2004) Pastiche Scenarios in More Funology Interactions XI. 5 - September / October, 2004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bell, G., Blythe, M., Gaver, W., Sengers P., Wright P.(2003): Designing Culturally Situated Products for the Home: CHI 2003 New Horizons. Extended Abstracts pp1062--1063 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bertelsen O., and Pold S., (2004) Criticism as an Approach to Interface Aesthetics. Nordichi 04 October 23--27 pp 23--32 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bourdieu, P., (1986) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniels U. S. (2008) Jakob Nielsen Declares the Letter "C" unusable. As Always, He's Right. http://uspressnews.com/articles/1101 Accessed 26.8.2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis M. (2003) Theoretical Foundations for Experiential Systems Design. ETP 03 2003 Berkeley, USA ACM pp45--52 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dearden A., & Walker S. (2005) (Eds) Special Issue of Interacting with Computers: Designing For Civil Society - volume 17 (1), Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. De Souza C. S (2005). The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction. MIT PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dourish P., Finlay J., Sengers P., and Wright P. (2004) "Reflective HCI: Towards a Critical Technical Practice." Extended Abstract. Vienna, Austria CHI-2004, April 2004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Eagleton T., (1990) The Significance of Theory. Basil Blackwell Ltd. OxfordGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Falk, J., & Dierking L., (1992) The Museum Experience Whalesback Books, Washington DCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Falk J., Moussori. T., and Coulson D., (1998) The effect of visitors' agendas on museum learning. Curator. 40/3: 211--218Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Frohlich D. (2004) Audiophotography: Bringing Photos to Life with Sounds.: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Frohlich D. M., Clancy T., Robinson J. & Costanzo E. (2004) The audiophoto desk. Proceedings of 2AD: Second International Conference on Appliance Design (p139).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Fry S. (1992) Paperweight (2004) Heinemann, LondonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaver W. (2007) Cultural Commentators: Non-native interpretations as resources for polyphonic assessment. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 65, 4. p. 292--305 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Gaver, W. (2001).Designing for Ludic Aspects of Everyday Life. ERCIM News No. 47, October. http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim_News/enw47/gaver.html. Accessed 26.8.200Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N.(2006): User experience -- a research agenda. In Behaviour and Information Technology, 25 (2) pp. 91--97Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Hook K., Sengers P., Andersson G., (2003) Sense and Sensibility: Evaluation and Interactive Art. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA pp 241--248 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hughes R., (1991) The Shock of the New: Art and the Century of Change. Thames & Hudson Ltd; Rev Ed editionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaye J., Boehner K., Laaksolahti J., Stahl A., (2007) Evaluating Experience Focussed HCI CHI 2007 SIG April 28-May 2. San Jose CA Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. McCarthy J. and Wright P. (2004) Technology as Experience. MIT Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Leonardonet. http://www.leonardonet.org/leonardonet.php Accessed 26.8.2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Monk A. F. & Lindley S., (2004) DJing with Photos. HCI 2004, Leeds, British HCI Group, 179--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen J., Flash 99% bad. Alertbox October 29 2000 http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20001029.html Accessed 26.8.2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1--5 April), 249--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Norman, D. (2002). Emotion and design: Attractive things work better. Interactions, ix, 4, 36--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Petersen M. G., Iversen O. S. Gall Krogh P., Ludvigsen M., (2004) Aesthetic Interaction -- A Pragmatist's Aesthetics of Interactive Systems Proceedings of the DIS 2004 Cambridge, MA, USA Pages: 269--276 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Responsive Home. Centre for Usable Home Technology. University of York. http://www.cuhtec.org.uk/resphome.php Accessed 26.8.3008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sengers P., Boehner K., David S and Kaye J. (2005) Reflective Design in proceedings of Critical Computing Aarhus Denmark Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sengers P., & Gaver B., (2006) Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. DIS 2006 PA, USA Pages: 99--108 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Thinkexist.com. Search on "critics" http://thinkexist.com/search/searchquotation.asp?search=critics&q= Accessed 26.8.2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila K., Roto V., senzahl M., (2008) Now Let's Do It in Practice: User Experience Evaluation Methods in Product Development. CHI 2008 Florence, ItalyGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wright P. and Finlay J. (2003) British HCI group international workshop "HCI, the Arts and the Humanities" - York 21st July King's Manor, York, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Wright, P. C. and McCarthy, J. (2005) The value of the novel in designing for experience. In Pirhonen, A., Isomäki, H., Roast, C. and Saariluoma, P. (Eds.) Future Interaction Design. Springer. pp. 9--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interaction design and the critics: what to make of the "weegie"

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '08: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges
      October 2008
      621 pages
      ISBN:9781595937049
      DOI:10.1145/1463160

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 October 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader