skip to main content
10.1145/1463689.1463710acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robotics in special needs education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to explore the potential of robotics as an educational tool in special needs education. Qualitative case studies are used to increase knowledge about programmable LEGO NXT and Topobo robotics constructions kits in special needs education, and about the social robot and Topobo that are used in early childhood education when possible learning disabilities have not yet been diagnosed. This study aims to provide suggestions about how robotics might be used to recognize disabilities at an early stage of education and to compensate for them in learning.

References

  1. Bogdan, R. C., and Biklen, S. K. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Pearson, the United States of America, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kärnä-Lin, E., Pihlainen-Bednarik, K., Sutinen, E., and Virnes, M. Can Robots Teach? Preliminary Results on Educational Robotics in Special Education. In Proc. International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 2006, IEEE Press (2006), 319--321. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lego Mindstorms. http://mindstorms.lego.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). http://www.pisa.oecd.org/pages/0,2987,en_32252351_32235731_1_1_1_1_1,00.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Raffle, H. S., Parkes, A. J., and Ishii, H. Topobo: A constructive assembly system with kinetic memory. Proc. SIGCHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 647--654. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tanaka, F., Cicourel, A., and Movellan, J. R. Socialization between Toddlers and Robots at an Early Childhood Education Center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(46), 2007, 17954--17958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Statistics Finland. While the number of pupils in full-time education increased, the number part-time special education decreased. http://www.stat.fi/til/erop/2006/erop_2006_2007-06-15_tie_001_en.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Robotics in special needs education

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IDC '08: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children
      June 2008
      289 pages
      ISBN:9781595939944
      DOI:10.1145/1463689

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 June 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader