skip to main content
10.1145/1514095.1514113acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An information pipeline model of human-robot interaction

Published:09 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the potential usefulness of viewing the system of human, robot, and environment as an "information pipeline" from environment to user and back again. Information theory provides tools for analyzing and maximizing the information rate of each stage of this pipeline, and could thus encompass several common HRI goals: "situational awareness," which can be seen as maximizing the information content of the human's model of the situation; efficient robotic control, which can be seen as finding a good codebook and high throughput for the Human-Robot channel; and artificial intelligence, which can be assessed by how much it reduces the traffic on all four channels. Analysis of the information content of the four channels suggests that human to robot communication tends to be the bottleneck, suggesting the need for greater onboard intelligence and a command interface that can adapt to the situation.

References

  1. D. Ayers and M. Shah. Monitoring human behavior from video taken in an office environment. Image and Vision Computing, 19(12), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. D. Baddeley and G. Hitch. Working memory. In G. A. Bower, editor, The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, pages 47--89. Academic Press, New York, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. E. Beckman, J. Hirschberg, and S. Shattuck-Hufnagel. The original tobi system and the evolution of the tobi framework. In S.-A. Jun, editor, Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, chapter 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. Bluethmann, R. Ambrose, M. Diftler, S. Askew, E. Huber, M. Goza, F. Rehnmark, C. Lovchik, and D. Magruder. Robonaut: A robot designed to work with humans in space. Autonomous robots, 14(2-3):179--197, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley-Interscience, 2nd edition, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. R. Endsley. Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA, 1988. Human Factors Society.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6):381--391, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Forlizzi and C. DiSalvo. Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 258--265, Salt Lake City, UT, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Gockley, J. Forlizzi, and R. Simmons. Interactions with a moody robot. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 186--193, Salt Lake City, UT, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Gold, M. Doniec, and B. Scassellati. Learning grounded semantics with word trees: Prepositions and pronouns. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Development and Learning, London, UK, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Hayes. Memory span for several vocabularies as a function of vocabulary size. Technical report, MIT Acoustics Laboratory, 1952. Cited in (Miller 1956).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ISO. ISO 9241-9: Ergonomics of Human System Interaction Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Jurafsky and J. H. Martin. Speech and Natural Language Processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Karat, C. Halverson, D. Horn, and J. Karat. Patterns of entry and correction in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 568--575, New York, 1999. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. S. Kim, K. Gold, and B. Scassellati. What prosody tells infants to believe. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Development and Learning. IEEE/Cognitive Science Society, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Kruger and D. Dunning. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6):1121--1134, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J. R. Lewis. Effect of error correction strategy on speech dictation through-put. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, 1999. HFES.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. I. S. MacKenzie, T. Kauppinen, and M. Silfverberg. Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 9--16, New York, 2001. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. G. J. McLachlan and T. Krishnan. The EM algorithm and extensions. Wiley, New York, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G. A. Miller. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63:81--97, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. H. Mixdorf. Speech technology, TOBI and making sense of prosody. In Speech Prosody, volume 3, pages 31--38, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. N. Omoigui, L. He, A. Gupta, J. Grudin, and E. Sanocki. Time-compression: Systems concerns, usage, and benefits. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 136--143, New York, 1999. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. A. Peters, R. E. Bodenheimer, and O. C. Jenkins. Sensory-motor manifold structure induced by task outcome: Experiments with Robonaut. In Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pages 484--489. IEEE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. I. Pollack and L. Ficks. Information of elementary multidimensional auditory displays. J. Acoustic Society of America, 26:155--158, 1954. Cited in (Miller 1956).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. A. Powers and S. Kiesler. The advisor robot: Tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 218--225, Salt Lake City, UT, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. R. Quinlan. Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1:81--106, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. H. S. Sawhney, S. Hsu, and R. Kumar. Robust video mosaicing through topology inference and local to global alignment. In Computer Vision -ECCV '98. Springer, Berlin, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. Schaal. Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. C. E. Shannon. Prediction and entropy of printed english. Bel l Systems Technical Journal, 30:50--64, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. S. Thrun, W. Burgard, and D. Fox. Probabilisitic Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. C. Torrey, A. Powers, M. Marge, S. R. Fussell, and S. Kiesler. Effects of adaptive robot dialogue on information exchange and social relations. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 126--133, Salt Lake City, UT, 2006. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. J. R. Williams. Guidelines for the use of multimedia in instruction. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, pages 1447--1451, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. R. Woodworth. Experimental Psychology. Holt and Co., New York, revised edition, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An information pipeline model of human-robot interaction

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                HRI '09: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
                March 2009
                348 pages
                ISBN:9781605584041
                DOI:10.1145/1514095

                Copyright © 2009 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 9 March 2009

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader