skip to main content
10.1145/1551788.1551808acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Putting interference to work in the design of a whole-class learning activity

Published: 03 June 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Who's Who is a single-display groupware application designed for use by an entire class of young students. Utilizing a shared display, each user controls the state of discrete display elements using a simple interface on a handheld device; however, the semantics of user operations are left unspecified and become the subjects of guided student discovery. Interference among users is leveraged in support of student learning about the scientific principle of "control of variables," in particular, the strategy of varying one independent variable at a time in multivariate systems. We present the experience of a third-grade classroom that used Who's Who, including both an account of learning outcomes and a description of the technology and social interactions that led to those outcomes.

References

[1]
American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
[2]
Chen, Z. and Klahr, D. 1999. All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development 70, 1098--1120.
[3]
Ha, V., Inkpen, K., Whalen, T., and Mandryk, R. 2006. Direct Intentions: The Effects of Input Devices on Collaboration around a Tabletop Display. In Proceedings of Tabletop '06 (Mawson Lakes, Australia, January 2006). IEEE Press, 177--184.
[4]
Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., Dalton, N. S., and Rogers, Y. 2008. Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input. In Proceedings of CSCW 2008 (San Diego, CA, November 2008). ACM Press, 167--176.
[5]
Inkpen, K., McGrenere, J., Booth, K. S., and Klawe, M. 1997. Turn-Taking Protocols for Mouse-Driven Collaborative Environments. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface '97, (Kelowna, BC, May 1997), 138--145.
[6]
Klahr, D. & M. Nigam. 2004. The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science 15, 10, 661--667 (2004).
[7]
Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., and O'Laughlin, M. 1988. The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
[8]
Moher, T. 2006. Embedded Phenomena: Supporting Science Learning with Classroom-sized Distributed Simulations. In Proceedings of CHI 2006 (Montreal, Canada, April 2006), 691--700.
[9]
Moher, T., Ding, X., Wiley, J., Conmy, D., Hussain, S., Singh, P., and Srinivasan, V. (2003). Combining Handhelds with a Whole-Class Display to Support the Learning of Scientific Control. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (Ft. Lauderdale, FL, April 2003), 882--883.
[10]
National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[11]
Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., & Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. 2007. Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 249--255.
[12]
Roschelle, J., and Pea, R. 2002. A walk on the wild side: How wireless handhelds may change CSCL. In Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (Boulder, CO, Jan. 2002). Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, 51--60.
[13]
Schauble, L. 1996. The development of scientific reasoning in knowledge-rich contexts. Developmental Psychology 32, 102--109.
[14]
Slavin, R. 1990. Cooperative Learning: Theory Research and Practice. Allyn and Bacon.
[15]
Soloway, E., Guzdial, M., and Hay, K. 1994. Learner-Centered Design: The Challenge for HCI in The 21st Century. interactions 1, 2, 36--48.
[16]
Stewart, J., Bederson, B., and Druin, A. 1999. Single display groupware: A model for co-present collaboration. In Proceedings of CHI '99 (Pittsburgh, PA, May 1999), ACM Press, 286--293.
[17]
Tsandilas T., Balakrishnan, R. 2005. An evaluation of techniques for reducing spatial interference in single display groupware. In Proceedings European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Paris, France, September 2005), 225--245.
[18]
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 2001. Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Percentage distribution of teachers' time spent on certain instructional approaches, by program and school type: Fall 1998.
[19]
Wilensky, U., and Stroup, W. 2000. Networked Gridlock: Students Enacting Complex Dynamic Phenomena with the HubNet Architecture. In Proceedings of ICLS 2000 (Ann Arbor, MI, June, 2000). Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, 282--289.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Assessment of learning in child–computer interaction researchInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.10057836:COnline publication date: 1-Jun-2023
  • (2022)Uncovering Children's Situated Design Capital – A Nexus Analytic InquiryProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3529732(408-421)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
  • (2022)The Role of Learning Theory in Child-Computer Interaction - A Semi-Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3529728(50-68)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022

Index Terms

  1. Putting interference to work in the design of a whole-class learning activity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IDC '09: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
    June 2009
    347 pages
    ISBN:9781605583952
    DOI:10.1145/1551788
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 June 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. control of variables
    2. elementary school learners
    3. interference
    4. science inquiry
    5. single-display groupware

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    IDC '09

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Assessment of learning in child–computer interaction researchInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.10057836:COnline publication date: 1-Jun-2023
    • (2022)Uncovering Children's Situated Design Capital – A Nexus Analytic InquiryProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3529732(408-421)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
    • (2022)The Role of Learning Theory in Child-Computer Interaction - A Semi-Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3529728(50-68)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media