research-article

Free access

Determining the benefits of direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger input on a multitouch workstation

Authors:

Maneesh Agrawala,

Tony DeRoseAuthors Info & Claims

GI '09: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009

Pages 119 - 124

Published: 25 May 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Multitouch workstations support direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger interaction. Previous studies have separately examined the benefits of these three interaction attributes over mouse-based interactions. In contrast, we present an empirical user study that considers these three interaction attributes together for a single task, such that we can quantify and compare the performances of each attribute. In our experiment users select multiple targets using either a mouse-based workstation equipped with one mouse, or a multitouch workstation using either one finger, two fingers (one from each hand), or multiple fingers. We find that the fastest multitouch condition is about twice as fast as the mouse-based workstation, independent of the number of targets. Direct-touch with one finger accounts for an average of 83% of the reduction in selection time. Bimanual interaction, using at least two fingers, one on each hand, accounts for the remaining reduction in selection time. Further, we find that for novice multitouch users there is no significant difference in selection time between using one finger on each hand and using any number of fingers for this task. Based on these observations we conclude with several design guidelines for developing multitouch user interfaces.

References

[1]

R. Balakrishnan and K. Hinckley. The role of kinesthetic reference frames in two-handed input performance. In Proc. UIST 1999, pages 171--178, 1999.

Digital Library

[2]

R. Balakrishnan and K. Hinckley. Symmetric bimanual interaction. In Proc. CHI 2000, pages 33--40, 2000.

Digital Library

[3]

W. Barnert. A comparison of one-handed and two-handed direct and indirect computer interaction. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, Mass., 11 2005.

[4]

H. Benko, A. Wilson, and P. Baudisch. Precise selection techniques for multitouch screens. In Proc. CHI 2006, pages 1263--1272, 2006.

Digital Library

[5]

E. Bier, M. Stone, K. Pier, W. Buxton, and T. DeRose. Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface. In Proc. Computer Graphics and Interactive Technique, pages 73--80, 1993.

Digital Library

[6]

W. Buxton and B. Myers. A study in two handed input. In Proc. CHI 1986, pages 321--326, 1986.

Digital Library

[7]

D. Casalta, Y. Guiard, and M. Beaudouin-Lafon. Evaluating twohanded input techniques: rectangle editing and navigation. In CHI 1999 (Extended Abstracts), pages 236--237, 1999.

Digital Library

[8]

J. Diedrichsen, E. Hazeltine, S. Kennerley, and R. B. Ivry. Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12(6):493--498, 2001.

[9]

R. F. Dillon, J. D. Edey, and J. W. Tombaugh. Measuring the true cost of command selection: Techniques and results. In Proc. CHI 1990, pages 19--25, 1990.

Digital Library

[10]

C. Forlines, D. Wigdor, C. Shen, and R. Balakrishnan. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proc. CHI 2007, pages 647--656, 1997.

Digital Library

[11]

Y. Guiard. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: The kinematic chain as a mode. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(4):486--517, 1987.

[12]

Y. Guiard and T. Ferrand. Asymmetry in bimanual skills. In Manual asymmetries in motor performance, CRC Press., 1995.

[13]

J. Han. Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In Proc. UIST 2005, pages 115--118, 2005.

Digital Library

[14]

M. Hancock, S. Carpendale, and A. Cockburn. Shallow depth 3d interaction: Design and evaluation of one-, two-, and three-touch techniques. In Proc. CHI 2007, pages 1147--1156, 2007.

Digital Library

[15]

K. Hinckley, M. Czerwinski, and M. Sinclair. Interaction and modeling techniques for desktop two-handed input. In Proc. VIST 1998, pages 49--58, 1998.

Digital Library

[16]

K. Hinckley, R. Pausch, D. Proffitt, and N. Kassell. Two-handed virtual manipulation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5(3):260--302, 1998.

Digital Library

[17]

K. Hinckley, R. Pausch, D. Proffitt, J. Patten, and N. Kassell. Cooperative bimanual action. In Proc. CHI 1997, pages 27--34, 1997.

Digital Library

[18]

P. Kabbash, W. Buxton, and A. Sellen. Two-handed input in a compound task. In Proc. CHI 1994, pages 417--423, 1994.

Digital Library

[19]

J. Karat, J. McDonald, and M. Anderson. A comparison of selection techniques: touch panel, mouse keyboard. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25(1):73--92, 1986.

Digital Library

[20]

J. A. S. Kelso, D. L. Southard, and D. Goodman. On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5(2):229--238, 1979.

[21]

J. A. S. Kelso, D. L. Southard, and D. Goodman. On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 203(4384):1029--1031, 1979.

[22]

C. Latulipe, C. Kaplan, and C. Clarke. Bimanual and unimanual image alignment: an evaluation of mouse-based techniques. In Proc. UIST 2005, pages 123--131, 2005.

Digital Library

[23]

C. Latulipe, S. Mann, C. Kaplan, and C. Clarke. Symspline: Symmetric two-handed spline manipulation. In Proc. CHI 2006, pages 349--358, 2006.

Digital Library

[24]

MERL - DiamondTouch. http://www.merl.com/projects/DiamondTouch/.

[25]

Microsoft Surface. http://www.microsoft.com/surface/index.html.

[26]

M. Morris. Supporting effective interaction with tabletop groupware. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2006.

Digital Library

[27]

T. Moscovich and J. Hughes. Indirect mappings of multi-touch input using one and two hands. In Proc. CHI 2008, pages 1275--1283, 2008.

Digital Library

[28]

D. Ostroff and B. Schneiderman. Selection devices for users of an electronic encyclopedia: An empirical comparison of four possibilities. Information Processing and Management, 24(6):665--680, 1988.

Digital Library

[29]

R. Owen, G. Kurtenbach, G. Fitzmaurice, T. Baudel, and W. Buxton. When it gets more difficult, use both hands: exploring bimanual curve manipulation. In Graphics Interface Conference, pages 17--24, 2005.

Digital Library

[30]

Perceptive Pixel. http://www.perceptivepixel.com/.

[31]

J. Rekimoto. Smartskin: An infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. In Proc. CHI 2002, pages 113--120, 2002.

Digital Library

[32]

S. D. Scott, K. D. Grant, and R. L. Mandryk. System guidelines for colocated, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 159--178, 2003.

Digital Library

[33]

A. Sears and B. Shneiderman. High precision touchscreens: design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(4):593--613, 1991.

Digital Library

[34]

M. Wu and R. Balakrishnan. Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. In Proc. UIST 2003, pages 193--202, 2003.

Digital Library

Cited By

Ma XYan ZMeng HCao ZJin YWang Z(2024)Get Your Hands Dirty? A Comparative Study of Tool Usage and Perceptual Engagement in Physical and Digital SculptingProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656188(358-373)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3656188
Pfeuffer KDinc AObernolte JRivu RAbdrabou YShelter FAbdelrahman YAlt F(2021)Bi-3D: Bi-Manual Pen-and-Touch Interaction for 3D Manipulation on TabletsThe 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3472749.3474741(149-161)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3472749.3474741
Williams AOrtega F(2020)Understanding Gesture and Speech Multimodal Interactions for Manipulation Tasks in Augmented Reality Using Unconstrained ElicitationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34273304:ISS(1-21)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3427330
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Determining the benefits of direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger input on a multitouch workstation
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction devices
      1. Touch screens

Recommendations

Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays
CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

We investigate the differences -- in terms of bothquantitative performance and subjective preference -- between direct-touch and mouse input for unimanual andbimanual tasks on tabletop displays. The results of twoexperiments show that for bimanual tasks ...
Combining and measuring the benefits of bimanual pen and direct-touch interaction on horizontal interfaces
AVI '08: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces

Many research projects have demonstrated the benefits of bimanual interaction for a variety of tasks. When choosing bimanual input, system designers must select the input device that each hand will control. In this paper, we argue for the use of pen and ...
Wearables as Context for Guiard-abiding Bimanual Touch
UIST '16: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

We explore the contextual details afforded by wearable devices to support multi-user, direct-touch interaction on electronic whiteboards in a way that-unlike previous work-can be fully consistent with natural bimanual-asymmetric interaction as set forth ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Guide Proceedings

GI '09: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009

May 2009

257 pages

ISBN:9781568814704

Program Chairs:
Amy Gooch
University of Victoria, Canada
,
Melanie Tory
University of Victoria, Canada

Sponsors

The Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society / Société Canadienne du Dialogue Humaine Machine (CHCCS/SCDHM)

Publisher

Canadian Information Processing Society

Canada

Publication History

Published: 25 May 2009

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Acceptance Rates

GI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 77 submissions, 36%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 206 of 508 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

48
Total Citations
View Citations
1,523
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)55
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ma XYan ZMeng HCao ZJin YWang Z(2024)Get Your Hands Dirty? A Comparative Study of Tool Usage and Perceptual Engagement in Physical and Digital SculptingProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656188(358-373)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3656188
Pfeuffer KDinc AObernolte JRivu RAbdrabou YShelter FAbdelrahman YAlt F(2021)Bi-3D: Bi-Manual Pen-and-Touch Interaction for 3D Manipulation on TabletsThe 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3472749.3474741(149-161)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3472749.3474741
Williams AOrtega F(2020)Understanding Gesture and Speech Multimodal Interactions for Manipulation Tasks in Augmented Reality Using Unconstrained ElicitationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34273304:ISS(1-21)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3427330
Niiro YKallmann MArif AKhamis MSorce SCauchard JGentile V(2019)An experimental comparison of touch and pen gestures on a vertical displayProceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/3321335.3324936(1-6)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3321335.3324936
Lisanti GKaraman SPezzatini DBimbo A(2018)A multi-camera image processing and visualization system for train safety assessmentMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-017-4351-477:2(1583-1604)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11042-017-4351-4
Besançon LIssartel PAmmi MIsenberg TMark GFussell SLampe Cschraefel mHourcade JAppert CWigdor D(2017)Mouse, Tactile, and Tangible Input for 3D ManipulationProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025863(4727-4740)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3025453.3025863
Rocha TBessa MCabral L(2016)Performing universal tasks using a mini iPadProceedings of the XVII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction10.1145/2998626.2998668(1-6)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2998626.2998668
Simeone ABulling AAlexander JGellersen HCostabile MBuono PMatera M(2016)Three-Point InteractionProceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/2909132.2909251(168-175)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2909132.2909251
Pfeuffer KAlexander JGellersen HKaye JDruin ALampe CMorris DHourcade J(2016)Partially-indirect Bimanual Input with Gaze, Pen, and Touch for Pan, Zoom, and Ink InteractionProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858201(2845-2856)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858201
Tiefenbacher PChouchane AMerget DSchenk SRigoll GKaye JDruin ALampe CMorris DHourcade J(2016)Biomechanics of Thumb Touch Gestures on Handheld DevicesProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2851581.2892294(3227-3233)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2851581.2892294
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten