skip to main content
10.5555/1555880.1555916guideproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Who dotted that 'i'?: context free user differentiation through pressure and tilt pen data

Published: 25 May 2009 Publication History

Abstract

With the proliferation of tablet PCs and multi-touch computers, collaborative input on a single sketched surface is becoming more and more prevalent. The ability to identify which user draws a specific stroke on a shared surface is widely useful in a) security/forensics research, by effectively identifying a forgery, b) sketch recognition, by providing the ability to employ user-dependent recognition algorithms on a multi-user system, and c) multi-user collaborative systems, by effectively discriminating whose stroke is whose in a complicated diagram. To ensure an adaptive user interface, we cannot expect nor require that users will self-identify nor restrict themselves to a single pen. Instead, we prefer a system that can automatically determine a stroke's owner, even when strokes by different users are drawn with the same pen, in close proximity, and near in timing. We present the results of an experiment that shows that the creator of an individual pen strokes can be determined with high accuracy, without supra-stroke context (such as timing, pen-ID, nor location), and based solely on the physical mechanics of how these strokes are drawn (specifically, pen tilt, pressure, and speed). Results from free-form drawing data, including text and doodles, but not signature data, show that our methods differentiate a single stroke (such as that of a dot of an 'i') between two users at an accuracy of 97.5% and between ten users at an accuracy of 83.5%.

References

[1]
C. Alvarado and R. Davis. Sketchread: a multi-domain sketch recognition engine. In UIST '04: Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 23--32. ACM, 2004.
[2]
H. Choi, B. Paulson, and T. Hammond. Gesture recognition based on manifold learning. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recongition, December 2008.
[3]
E. v. O. J. Dolfing, J. G. A.; Aarts. On-line signature verification with hidden markov models. Pattern Recognition, 1998. Proceedings. Fourteenth International Conference on, 2:1309--1312 vol. 2, 16--20 Aug 1998.
[4]
T. Hammond and R. Davis. Ladder, a sketching language for user interface developers. Computers & Graphics, 29(4):518--532, 2005.
[5]
C. Herot. Graphical input through machine recognition of sketches. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pages 97--102, 1976.
[6]
A. K. Jain, F. D. Griess, S. D. Connell, E. Lansing, and M. J. On-line signature verification. Pattern Recognition, 35:2963--2972, 2002.
[7]
M. Kawamoto, T. Hamamoto, and S. Hangai. Improvement of on-line signature verification system robust to intersession variability, pages 168--175, 2002.
[8]
K. Koppenhaver. Forensic Document Examination. Humana Press, 2006.
[9]
A. C. Long, J. A. Landay, and L. A. Rowe. "those look similar!" issues in automating gesture design advice. In PUI '01: Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on Perceptive user interfaces, pages 1--5, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press.
[10]
R. N. Morris. Forensic Handwritting Identification. Academic Press, 2000.
[11]
K. Murakami and H. Taguchi. Gesture recognition using recurrent neural networks. In CHI '91: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 237--242, New York, NY, USA, 1991. ACM.
[12]
D. Muramatsu and T. Matsumoto. Effectiveness of pen pressure, azimuth, and altitude features for online signature verification. Advances in Biometrics, pages 503--512, 2007.
[13]
V. Nalwa. Automatic on-line signature verification. Proceedings of the IEEE, 85(2):215--239, Feb 1997.
[14]
A. Richiardi, J.; Hamed Ketabdar; Drygajlo. Local and global feature selection for on-line signature verification. Document Analysis and Recognition, 2005. Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on, pages 625--629 Vol. 2, 29 Aug.-1 Sept. 2005.
[15]
D. Rubine. Specifying gestures by example. In SIGGRAPH '91: Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 329--337, New York, NY, USA, 1991. ACM Press.
[16]
T. M. Sezgin and R. Davis. Hmm-based efficient sketch recognition. In IUI '05: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 281--283, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
[17]
T. M. Sezgin, T. Stahovich, and R. Davis. Sketch based interfaces: early processing for sketch understanding. In PUI '01: Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on Perceptive user interfaces, pages 1--8, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press.
[18]
T. M. Sezgin, T. Stahovich, and R. Davis. Sketch based interfaces: Early processing for sketch understanding. In The Proceedings of 2001 Perceptive User Interfaces Workshop (PUI '01), Orlando, FL, November 2001.
[19]
J. J. Shah, N. Vargas-Hernandez, J. D. Summers, and S. Kulkarni. Collaborative sketching (c-sketch) - an idea generation technique for engineering design. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3): 168--198, 2007.
[20]
J. O. Wobbrock, A. D. Wilson, and Y. Li. Gestures without libraries, toolkits or training: a $1 recognizer for user interface prototypes. In UIST '07: Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 159--168, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)It’s Not Just about AccuracyACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/31816738:3(1-47)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018
  • (2011)Analyse procéduraleProceedings of the 23rd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine10.1145/2044354.2044374(1-4)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2011

Index Terms

  1. Who dotted that 'i'?: context free user differentiation through pressure and tilt pen data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Guide Proceedings
    GI '09: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009
    May 2009
    257 pages
    ISBN:9781568814704

    Sponsors

    • The Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society / Société Canadienne du Dialogue Humaine Machine (CHCCS/SCDHM)

    Publisher

    Canadian Information Processing Society

    Canada

    Publication History

    Published: 25 May 2009

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    GI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 77 submissions, 36%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 206 of 508 submissions, 41%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2018)It’s Not Just about AccuracyACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/31816738:3(1-47)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018
    • (2011)Analyse procéduraleProceedings of the 23rd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine10.1145/2044354.2044374(1-4)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2011

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media