skip to main content
10.1145/1613858.1613895acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expectations for user experience in haptic communication with mobile devices

Published: 15 September 2009 Publication History

Abstract

The haptic modality -- the sense of touch -- is utilized very limitedly in current human-computer interaction. Especially in mobile communication, the haptic modality could provide a means for richer multimodal and emotional communication between users over distance. Haptic user interface prototypes have been developed but their user experience has not been studied extensively. We conducted seven focus group sessions to study users' expectations for user experience of haptic interaction, specifically focusing on mobile communication. The paper presents the user experience factors that were regarded by potential users as salient in haptic interaction: subjective quality of the haptic stimuli, privacy, intimacy and spontaneity. Also the possibilities, restrictions and suitability of the haptic mobile communication are discussed. Most appropriate use cases for haptic communication were found to be conveying emotions and binary information. As the main conclusion, we present design guidelines for haptic mobile communication that were drawn up based on the findings.

References

[1]
Arhippainen, L., Tähti, M. 2003. Empirical Evaluation of User Experience in Two Adaptive Mobile Application Prototypes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Norrköping, Sweden
[2]
Brave, S.&Dahley, A. 1997. In Touch: a medium for haptic interpersonal communication. In CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Looking To the Future, Atlanta, Georgia, March 22--27, 1997. ACM PRess, New York, NY, USA, pp. 363--364.
[3]
Brown. L. M., Williamson, J. 2007. Shake-to-talk: Multimodal Messaging for Interpersonal Communication. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Haptic and Audio Interaction Design (Seoul, Korea). Spinger LNCS.
[4]
Chang, A., O'Modhrain, S., Jacob, R., Gunther, E., and Ishii, H. 2002. ComTouch: design of a vibrotactile communication device. In Proceedings of DIS 2002, London, England, June 25--28, 2002. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 312--320.
[5]
Chen, H.-Y., Santos, J., Graves, M., Kim, K., and Tan, H. Z. 2008. Tactor localization at the wrist. M. Ferre (Ed.): EuroHaptics 2008, LNCS 5024, pp. 209--218.
[6]
Clark, H. H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Fukumoto, M. and Sugimura, T. 2001. Active click: tactile feedback for touch panels. In CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington, March 31 -- April 05, 2001. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 121--122.
[8]
Haans, A., de Nood, C., and IJsselsteijn, W. A. 2007. Investigating response similarities between real and mediated social touch: a first test. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, April 28 -- May 03, 2007. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 2405--2410.
[9]
Hassenzahl, M. 2003. The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk,&P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 31--42
[10]
Hassenzahl&Tractinsky. User Experience -- a Research Agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology, Vol. 25, No. 2, March--April 2006, pp. 91--97.
[11]
Hoggan, E.&Brewster, S. 2007. Designing audio and tactile crossmodal icons for mobile devices. In Proceedings of ICMI 2007, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, November 12--15, 2007. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 162--169.
[12]
Hoggan, E., Brewster, S. and Anwar, S. Mobile Multi-Actuator Tactile Displays. To appear in Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop Haptic and Audio Interaction Design (Seoul, Korea). Springer LNCS.
[13]
Kankainen, A. (2003). UCPCD: user-centered product concept design. In Designing For User Experiences, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences (pp. 1--13). New York: ACM Press.
[14]
Leung, R., MacLean, K., Bertelsen, M. B., and Saubhasik, M. 2007. Evaluation of haptically augmented touchscreen gui elements under cognitive load. In Proceedings of ICMI 2007, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, November 12--15, 2007. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 374--381.
[15]
Linjama, J.&Kaaresoja, T. 2004. Novel, minimalist haptic gesture interaction for mobile devices. In Proceedings of NordiCHI 2004, Tampere, Finland, October 23--27, 2004. ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 457--458.
[16]
Luk, J., Pasquero, J., Little, S., MacLean, K., Levesque, V., and Hayward, V. 2006. A role for haptics in mobile interaction: initial design using a handheld tactile display prototype. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 22--27, 2006. R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries, and G. Olson, Eds. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 171--180.
[17]
MacLean, K. E. 2000. Designing with Haptic Feedback. In Proceedings of ICRA 2000, San Francisco, CA, USA, April 22--28, 2000.
[18]
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2008. {WWW}. {Cited 26/1/2009}. Available at: http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/haptic.
[19]
Mortensen, C. D. 2007. Communication Theory. 2nd edition. New Jersey, USA. Transaction Publishers.
[20]
Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., and Kuorelahti, J. 2005. Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon, USA, April 02--07, 2005. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 919--928.
[21]
Pakkanen, T., Lylykangas, J., Raisamo, J., Raisamo, R., Salminen, K., Rantala, J., and Surakka, V. 2008. Perception of low-amplitude haptic stimuli when biking. In Proceedings of ICMI 2008, Chania, Crete, Greece, October 20--22, 2008. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 281--284.
[22]
Smith J., MacLean K. 2007. Communicating Emotion Through a Haptic Link: Design Space and Methodology. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. Volume 65, Issue 4, April 2007, pp. 376--387.
[23]
Yohanan, S., Chan, M., Hopkins, J., Sun, H., and MacLean, K. 2005. Hapticat: exploration of affective touch. In Proceedings of ICMI 2005, Torento, Italy, October 04--06, 2005. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 222--229.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Shape2Vibe: A Tangible Tool for Vibrotactile Co-Design with People with DeafblindnessProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3635264(1-6)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Human Expectations and Perceptions of Learning in Machine TeachingProceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3565472.3595612(13-24)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Mediated Social Touch With Mobile Devices: A Review of Designs and EvaluationsIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2023.332750616:4(785-804)Online publication date: Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Expectations for user experience in haptic communication with mobile devices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MobileHCI '09: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
    September 2009
    473 pages
    ISBN:9781605582818
    DOI:10.1145/1613858

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 September 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. communication
    2. focus group study
    3. guidelines
    4. haptics
    5. mobile
    6. user experience

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    MobileHCI '09

    Acceptance Rates

    MobileHCI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 23 of 95 submissions, 24%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 202 of 906 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Shape2Vibe: A Tangible Tool for Vibrotactile Co-Design with People with DeafblindnessProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3635264(1-6)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Human Expectations and Perceptions of Learning in Machine TeachingProceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3565472.3595612(13-24)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Mediated Social Touch With Mobile Devices: A Review of Designs and EvaluationsIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2023.332750616:4(785-804)Online publication date: Oct-2023
    • (2023)Shape memory alloy actuators for haptic wearables: A reviewMaterials & Design10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112264233(112264)Online publication date: Sep-2023
    • (2022)User-centred quality of UI interventions aiming to influence online news commenting behaviourBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.210872342:12(2060-2092)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2022
    • (2022)‘How should my family assistant be?’: initial perceptions about prospective and anticipated use of in-home virtual assistants in an emerging contextBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.205435742:7(961-984)Online publication date: 17-Apr-2022
    • (2020)Using Cognitive Psychology to Understand Anticipated User Experience in Computing ProductsResearch Anthology on Rehabilitation Practices and Therapy10.4018/978-1-7998-3432-8.ch027(545-566)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2020
    • (2020)Tactile Board: A Multimodal Augmentative and Alternative Communication Device for Individuals with DeafblindnessProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3428361.3428465(223-228)Online publication date: 22-Nov-2020
    • (2020)Usability evaluation of frugal innovation: A case of mobile training for micro businesses in TanzaniaAfrican Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development10.1080/20421338.2020.1772951(1-14)Online publication date: 4-Jul-2020
    • (2018)AN ENHANCED BRAS (E-BRAZ) ANDROID APP FOR MONITORING PMS IN GAS STATIONSi-manager's Journal on Mobile Applications and Technologies10.26634/jmt.5.2.156275:2(1)Online publication date: 2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media