ABSTRACT
Augmented tabletops have recently attracted considerable attention in the literature. However, little has been known about the effects that these interfaces have on learning tasks. In this paper, we report on the results of an empirical study that explores the usage of tabletop systems in an expressive collaborative learning task. In particular, we focus on measuring the difference in learning outcomes at individual and group levels between students using two interfaces: traditional computer and augmented tabletop with tangible input.
No significant effects of the interface on individual learning gain were found. However, groups using traditional computer learned significantly more from their partners than those using tabletop interface. Further analysis showed an interaction effect of the condition and the group heterogeneity on learning outcomes. We also present our qualitative findings in terms of how group interactions and strategy differ in the two conditions.
- J. P. Birnholtz, T. Grossman, C. Mak, and R. Balakrishnan. An exploratory study of input configuration and group process in a negotiation task using a large display. CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 91--100, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. S. Bruner. Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1966.Google Scholar
- C. Buchs, F. Butera, and G. Mugny. Resource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24:291--314, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Dietz and D. Leigh. Diamondtouch: A multi-user touch technology. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'01), pages 219--226, |2001|. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Dillenbourg. What do you mean by collaborative learning? P. Dillenbourg (Ed) Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pages 1--19, 1999.Google Scholar
- S. Do-Lenh, A. Sharma, F. Kaplan, and P. Dillenbourg. Multi-finger interactions with papers on augmented tabletops. In International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction. ACM, February 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Forlines, D. Wigdor, C. Shen, and R. Balakrishnan. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 647--656, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- V. Ha, K. M. Inkpen, R. L. Mandryk, and T. Whalen. Direct intentions: the effects of input devices on collaboration around a tabletop display. Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems, 2006. TableTop 2006. First IEEE International Workshop on, pages 8 pp.+, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Y. Han. Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 115--118, 2005. 1095054 115--118. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Hornecker, P. Marshall, N. S. Dalton, and Y. Rogers. Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input. CSCW '08: Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 167--176, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Kerawalla, D. Pearce, N. Yuill, R. Luckin, and A. Harris. "i'm keeping those there, are you?" the role of a new user interface paradigm - separate control of shared space (scoss) - in the collaborative decision-making process. Comput. Educ., 50(1):193--206, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. R. Lewis. Ibm computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 7(1):57--78, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Manches, C. O'Malley, and S. Benford. Physical manipulation: evaluating the potential for tangible designs. In TEI '09: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pages 77--84, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Marshall. Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? TEI '07: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, pages 163--170, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Marshall, E. Hornecker, R. Morris, N. Sheep Dalton, and Y. Rogers. When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface. In 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems, 2008. TABLETOP 2008., pages 33--40, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Müller-Tomfelde and C. Schremmer. Touchers and mousers: commonalities and differences in co-located collaboration with multiple input devices. CHI '08: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1149--1152, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. A. Nacenta, D. Pinelle, D. Stuckel, and C. Gutwin. The effects of interaction technique on coordination in tabletop groupware. GI '07: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2007, pages 191--198, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Oviatt, A. Arthur, and J. Cohen. Quiet interfaces that help students think. UIST '06: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 191--200, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- U. S. Pawar, J. Pal, R. Gupta, and K. Toyama. Multiple mice for retention tasks in disadvantaged schools. CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1581--1590, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. S. Raffle, A. J. Parkes, and H. Ishii. Topobo: a constructive assembly system with kinetic memory. In CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 647--654, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Rekimoto. Smartskin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'02), pages 113--120, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Rogers, Y. Lim, W. Hazlewood, and P. Marshall. Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single users displays? Human-Computer Interaction, 24(2), 2009.Google Scholar
- Y. Rogers and S. Lindley. Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interacting with Computers, 16(6):1133--1152, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Ryall, C. Forlines, C. Shen, and M. R. Morris. Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. CSCW '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 284--293, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Scott, R. Mandryk, and K. Inkpen. Understanding children's collaborative interactions in shared environments. Journal of Computer-Aided Learning, 19(2):220--228, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Setlock, S. Fussell, and C. Nuwirth. Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, pages 604--613, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Stewart, B. B. Bederson, and A. Druin. Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration. In CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 286--293, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. S. Tan, D. Gergle, R. Mandryk, K. Inkpen, M. Kellar, K. Hawkey, and M. Czerwinski. Using job-shop scheduling tasks for evaluating collocated collaboration. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 12(3):255--267, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Tse, C. Shen, S. Greenberg, and C. Forlines. How pairs interact over a multimodal digital table. CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 215--218, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Ullmer and H. Ishii. The metadesk: models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces. ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology, (UIST97), pages 223--232, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Underkoffler and H. Ishii. Illuminating light: a casual optics workbench. In CHI '99: CHI '99 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 5--6, New York, NY, USA, 1999. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Webb. Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13:21--39, 1989.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Wellner. Interacting with paper on the digital desk. Communications of the ACM, 36(7):87--96, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Zhang and M. Takatsuka. Put that there now: Group dynamics of tabletop interaction under time pressure. IEEE Tabletop, 2007, pages 37--43, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Paper-based concept map: the effects of tabletop on an expressive collaborative learning task
Recommendations
Semi-automatic zooming for mobile map navigation
MobileHCI '10: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and servicesIn this paper we present a novel interface for mobile map navigation based on Semi-Automatic Zooming (SAZ). SAZ gives the user the ability to manually control the zoom level of an SDAZ interface, while retaining the automatic zooming characteristics of ...
Paper equals screen: a comparison of a pen-based figural creativity test in computerized and paper form
DESIRE '11: Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in DesignIn this paper, we present the results of an experiment investigating how the results of a figural creativity test are affected when paper and pen or tablet PC and stylus are used to test participants. The results show no effect of the testing method on ...
Development History and Concept Analysis of Tangible Interaction Design
HCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Design, User Experience and InteractionAbstractObjectives: In view of the chaotic and fuzzy phenomenon of tangible interaction design and related concepts, this study sorts out and summarizes the development history of tangible interaction design, discusses and defines the concept of tangible ...
Comments