skip to main content
10.5555/1671011.1671044acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesbcs-hciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Forecasting software visualizations: an explorative study

Published:01 September 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

A qualitative explorative evaluation considered the effects of six visualization interfaces of sales forecasting systems on 60 university students. The study builds on earlier research from the domain of business forecasting in supply chain industries. The evaluation generates exemplar interfaces derived from the theoretical framework and task analysis of interviews with 20 expert users and designers of forecasting systems. The implications for information visualization and interaction design are discussed.

References

  1. Andrews, K. (2006). Evaluating information visualizations. In Proceedings of the AVI workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization, Venice, Italy, 1--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Principles of Forecasting: a Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D. & Shneiderman, B. (Editors). Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Davenport, T. H. & Markus, M. L. (1999). Rigor vs relevance: response to Benbasat and Zmud. MIS Quarterly, 23 (1), 19--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ellis, G. & Dix, A. (2006). An explorative analysis of user evaluation studies in information visualisation. In Proceedings of the conference on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods For information Visualization. Venice, Italy, May 23, 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Faisai, S, Craft, B. & Bladford, A. (2008). Internalization, qualitative methods, and evaluation. In Proceedings of the Conference on Beyond Time and Errors: novel evaluation methods for Information Visualization, Florence, Italy, Article No5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fildes, R., Goodwin, P. & Lawrence, M. (2006). The design features of forecasting support systems and their effectiveness. Decision Support Systems, 42 (1), 351--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fildes, R. & Goodwin, P. (2007). Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgement in forecasting. Interfaces, 37 (6), 570--576. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fildes, R., Goodwin, P., Lawrence, M. & Nikolopoulos, K. (2009). Effective forecasting for supply-chain planning: an empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement. International Journal of Forecasting, 25 (1), 3--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Galbraith, C. S. & Merrill, G. B. (1996). The politics of forecasting: managing the truth. California Management Review, 38 (2), 29--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodwin, P., Fildes, R., Lawrence, M. & Nikolopoulos, K. (2007). The process of using a forecasting support system. International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 391--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Isenberg, P., Zuk, T., Collins, C. & Carpendale, S. (2008). Grounded evaluation of information visualizations. In Proceedings of the conference on Beyond Time and Errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization, Florence, Italy, Article No6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kobsa, A. (2001). An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualization systems. In Proceedings of IEEE symposium on Information Visualization. San Diego, CA, USA, Oct. 22--23, 123--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Küsters U., McCullogh, B. & Bell, M. (2006). Forecasting software: Past, present and future. International Journal of Forecasting, 22 (3), 599--615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lawrence, M., Goodwin, P., O' Connor, M. J. & Onkal, D. (2007). Judgemental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25 years, International Journal of Forecasting, 22, 493--518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Lee, W. Y., Goodwin, P., Fildes, R., Nikolopoulos, K. & Lawrence, M. (2007). Providing support for the use of analogies in demand forecasting tasks. International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 377--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lim, S. J. & O'Connor, M. (1996). Judgemental forecasting with interactive forecasting support systems. Decision Support Systems, 16, 339--357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S. C. & Hyndman, R. J. (1998). Forecasting: Methods and Applications (3rd edition). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mentzer, J. T., Bienstock, C. C. & Kahn, K. B. (1999). Benchmarking sales forecasting management. Business Horizons, 48--56, May--June.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Moon, M. A., Mentzer, T. J. & Smith, D. C. (2003). Conducting a sales forecasting audit. International Journal of Forecasting, 19, 5--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sanders, N. R. & Manrodt, K. B. (2003). Forecasting software in practice: Use, satisfaction, and performance. Interfaces, 33, 90--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd edition). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas, J. J., & Cook, K. A. (Editors). (2005). Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Computer Society Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Thomas, J. J., & Cook, A. K. (2006). A Visual Analytics Agenda, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 26 (1), 10--13, Jan/Feb. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tory, M., & Staub-French, S. (2008). Qualitative analysis of visualization: A building design field study. In Proceedings of the conference on Beyond Time and Errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization, Florence, Italy, Article No 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Winklhofer, H., Diamantopoulos, A. & Witt, F. S. (1996). Forecasting practice: a review of the empirical literature and an agenda for future research. International Journal of Forecasting, 12, 193--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Forecasting software visualizations: an explorative study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          BCS-HCI '09: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology
          September 2009
          532 pages

          Publisher

          BCS Learning & Development Ltd.

          Swindon, United Kingdom

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 September 2009

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate28of62submissions,45%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader