skip to main content
10.5555/1671011.1671067acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesbcs-hciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users

Published: 01 September 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Personal robots and screen agents can be equipped with social abilities to facilitate interaction. This paper describes our research on the influence of these abilities on elderly user's acceptance of such a system. Experiments were set up in eldercare institutions where a robotic and screen agent with simulated conversational capabilities were used in a Wizard of Oz experiment. Both agents were used with two conditions: a more socially communicative (the agent made use of a larger set of social abilities in interaction) and a less socially communicative interface. Results show that participants who were confronted with the more socially communicative version of the robotic agent felt more comfortable and were more expressive in communicating with it. This suggests that the more socially communicative condition would be more likely to be accepted as a conversational partner. This effect was less strong however, with the screen agent, suggesting that embodiment plays a role in this. Furthermore, results did show a correlation between social abilities as perceived by participants and some aspects of technology acceptance for both systems, but this did not relate to the more and less socially communicative conditions. Evaluating the experiments and specifically the use of our acceptance model we suggest that this particular context of robotic and screen agents for elderly users requires the development of a more appropriate acceptance model which not only features technology acceptance, but also conversational acceptance.

References

[1]
Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C., and Gemperle, F. "Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elderly Living Independently in Their Homes." Journal of HCI Special Issue on Human-Robot Interaction, V19 N1/2, January, 2004.
[2]
Pollack, M. "Intelligent Technology for an Aging Population: The Use of AI to Assist Elderly with Cognitive Impairment." AI Magazine, Summer (2005)
[3]
Taggart, W., Turkle, S., and Kidd, C., "An interactive robot in a nursing home: Preliminary remarks." In "Towards Social Mechanisms of Android Science", Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy, July 2005.
[4]
Mynatt, E. D., Essa, I., and Rogers, W., "Increasing the opportunities for aging in place." Proceedings of the CUU 2000 Conference on Universal Usability New York: ACM. 65--71. 2000
[5]
Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T. and Tanie, K., "Effects of Robot Assisted Activity to Elderly People who Stay at a Health Service Facility for the Aged." Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas, Nevada, October 2003.
[6]
Forlizzi, J. "Robotic products to assist the aging population." Interactions, volume 12 Issue 2, 2005
[7]
Graf, B., Hans, M., and Schraft, R. D. "Care-O-bot II - development of a next generation robotic home assistant." Autonomous robots 16.2, 2004.
[8]
Giuliani, M.; Scopelliti, M.; and Fornara, F. 2005. Coping strategies and technology in later life. In Proceedings of AISB 2005 - Symposium "Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction", Hatfield, UK.
[9]
Wilson, E. V., and Lankton, N. K. (2004). Modeling Patients' Acceptance of Provider Delivered E-Health. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 11: 4. 241--248.
[10]
Zajicek M., Arnold A., (1999), The 'Technology Push' and The User Tailored Information Environment, 5th European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics, Workshop on 'User interfaces for all', Dagstuhl, Germany
[11]
Bartneck, C., Reichenbach, J., Breemen, A. J. N. van, "In your face, robot! The influence of a character's embodiment on how users perceive its emotional expressions, Design and Emotion." Proceedings of the Design and Emotion 2004 Conference Ankara, Turkey: 2004.
[12]
Reeves, B. and Nash, C. "The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Televisions, and New Media as Real People and Places." New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[13]
Breazeal, C., "Towards sociable robots", Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42.3-4: 167--175, 2003
[14]
Breazeal, C., "Socially intelligent robots", Interactions, Volume 12 Issue 2: 19--22, 2005
[15]
Dautenhahn, K., Ogden, B., and Quick, T., "From embodied to socially embedded agents---implications for interaction aware robots", Cognitive Systems Research (3), 2002
[16]
Dautenhahn, K. "Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy." Robotica, Volume 21 Issue 4 august 2003
[17]
Duffy, B. R. "Anthropomorphism and The Social Robot." Robotics and Autonomous Systems, march (2003): 170--190.
[18]
Libin, A. "Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: Preliminary inquiry." American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, Vol. 19-2, 2004.
[19]
Shibata, T, Wada, K., and Tanie, K., "Statistical Analysis and Comparison of Questionnaire Results of Subjective Evaluations of Seal Robot in Japan and U.K." Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation 2003.
[20]
Wada, K. and Shibata, T., "Robot Therapy in a Care House - Results of Case Studies", Proceedings RO-MAN, Hertfordshire, September 2006
[21]
Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J., Roy, N., Thrun, S., and Verma, V., "Experiences with a Mobile Robotic Guide for the Elderly." Proceedings of the AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2002.
[22]
Pineau, J., Montemerlo, M., Pollack, M., Roy, N. and Thrun, S. "Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results." Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42 (2003): 271--281. 2003
[23]
Libin, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J. "Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: preliminary inquiry." American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias 19.2 (2004)
[24]
De Ruyter, B., Saini, P., Markopoulos., P. and Van Breemen, A. J. N. "Assessing the Effects of Building Social Intelligence in a Robotic Interface for the Home." Interacting with Computers, Volume 17, Issue 5, 1 September 2005, 522--541. 2005
[25]
Venkatesh, V,. Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Towards a Unified View." MIS Quaterly, 27(3), 425--478, 2003
[26]
Looije, R., F. Cnossen, M. A. Neerincx, "Incorporating Guidelines for Health Assistance into a Socially Intelligent Robot", Proceedings RO-MAN, Hertfordshire, September 2006
[27]
Bickmore, T., and Picard R. W., "Towards Caring Machines", Proceedings of CHI, Vienna, April 2004.
[28]
Bickmore, T., and Picard R. W., "Establishing and Maintaining Long-Term Human-Computer Relationships", ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 12, No. 2, June 2005.
[29]
Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. B. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication, 3 (2), 1997
[30]
Lee, Kwan Min, Clifford Nass. "Digital sociability: Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction." Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems 2003.
[31]
Shinozawa, K., Reeves, B., Wise, K., Lim, S., Maldonado, H., and Naya, F., "Robots as New Media: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social and Cognitive Responses to Robotic and On-Screen Agent." Proceedings of Annual Conference of Internation Communication Association 2003, pp. 998--1002, 2003.
[32]
Shinozawa, K, Naya, F., Yamato, J. and Kogure, K., "Differences in Effect of Robot and Screen Agent Recommendations on Human Decision-Making," IJHCS Vol 62/2, pp 267--279, 2005.
[33]
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K. "A survey of socially interactive robots." Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 2003.
[34]
Gresham, F. M., and Elliot, S. N., "Social abilities rating system." Manua. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service, 1990
[35]
Heylen, D., Nijholt, A., & Reidsma, D., "Determining what people feel and think when interacting with humans and machines: notes on corpus collection and annotation." Proceedings 1st California Conference on Recent Advances in Engineering Mechanics, 2006.
[36]
Gockley, R., R. Simmons and J. Forlizzi, "Modeling Affect in Socially Interactive Robots", Proceedings RO-MAN, Hertfordshire, September 2006
[37]
Lee, B., G. D. Hope, and N. J. Witts, "Could next generation androids get emotionally close? 'Relational closeness' from human dyadic interactions", Proceedings RO-MAN, Hertfordshire, September 2006
[38]
Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). "People's conceptions of intelligence." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37--55.
[39]
Sidner, C. L.; Lee, C., "Engagement During Dialogues with Robots." AAAI Spring Symposia, March 2005.
[40]
Axelrod, L. and Hone, K., "Identifying Affectemes: Transcribing Conversational Behaviour", Proceedings of the Symposium on Conversational Informatics for Supporting Social Intelligence and Interaction, 2005.
[41]
Cerrato, L. A. "Comparison between Feedback Strategies in Human-to-Human and Human-Machine Communication." Proceedings of ICSLP 2002 Denver, Colorado USA: 2002.
[42]
Scherer, K. R. "Toward a dynamic theory of emotion: The component process model of affective states." Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication, 1987.
[43]
Decoster, J. & Claypool, H. M., "A Meta-Analysis of Priming Effects on Impression Formation Supporting a General Model of Informational Biases." Personality and social psychology review, 8(1), 2004.
[44]
Chartrand T. L., Bargh J. A. "The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction." Journal of Personality and Social Psycholology, Jun; 76(6), 1999.
[45]
Kahn, P. H., Jr., N. G. Freier, B. Friedman, R. L. Severson, and E. Feldman, "Social and moral relationships with robotic others?" in Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan, 2004

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Automation and Creativity: A Case Study of DJs' and VJs' Ambivalent Positions on Automated Visual SoftwareProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376463(1-11)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
  • (2011)Mobile remote presence systems for older adultsProceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction10.1145/1957656.1957665(19-26)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2011
  • (2011)Touch versus in-air hand gesturesProceedings of the Second international conference on Ambient Intelligence10.1007/978-3-642-25167-2_42(309-313)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2011
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Measuring the influence of social abilities on acceptance of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    BCS-HCI '09: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology
    September 2009
    532 pages

    Sponsors

    • British Computer Society: BCS

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    BCS Learning & Development Ltd.

    Swindon, United Kingdom

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2009

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. geriatrics
    2. robot acceptance
    3. technology acceptance model
    4. user interfaces

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    BCS HCI '09
    Sponsor:
    • British Computer Society

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 28 of 62 submissions, 45%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Automation and Creativity: A Case Study of DJs' and VJs' Ambivalent Positions on Automated Visual SoftwareProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376463(1-11)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
    • (2011)Mobile remote presence systems for older adultsProceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction10.1145/1957656.1957665(19-26)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2011
    • (2011)Touch versus in-air hand gesturesProceedings of the Second international conference on Ambient Intelligence10.1007/978-3-642-25167-2_42(309-313)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2011
    • (2010)Wizard of Oz experiments and companion dialoguesProceedings of the 24th BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference10.5555/2146303.2146321(117-123)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2010

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media