research-article

Critic, compatriot, or chump?: responses to robot blame attribution

Authors:

Victoria Groom,

Theresa Johnson,

Clifford NassAuthors Info & Claims

HRI '10: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction

Pages 211 - 218

Published: 02 March 2010 Publication History

Abstract

As their abilities improve, robots will be placed in roles of greater responsibility and specialization. In these contexts, robots may attribute blame to humans in order to identify problems and help humans make sense of complex information. In a between-participants experiment with a single factor (blame target) and three levels (human blame vs. team blame vs. self blame) participants interacted with a robot in a learning context, teaching it their personal preferences. The robot performed poorly, then attributed blame to either the human, the team, or itself. Participants demonstrated a powerful and consistent negative response to the human-blaming robot. Participants preferred the self-blaming robot over both the human and team blame robots. Implications for theory and design are discussed.

References

[1]

V. Groom and C. Nass, "Can robots be teammates?: Benchmarks and predictors of failure in human-robot teams," Interaction Studies, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 483--500.

[2]

B. Reeves and C. Nass, The Media Equation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[3]

C. Nass, J. S. Steuer and E. Tauber, "Computers are social actors," Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA {CHI '94, ACM Press, New York, NY, 72--77, 1994}.

Digital Library

[4]

C. Nass and S. B. Brave, Wired for Speech. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.

[5]

B. Friedman, R. H. Kahn and J. Hagman, "Hardware Companions? What Online AIBO Discussion Forums Reveal about the Human-Robotic Relationship," Proceedings of CHI 2003 {CHI '03, ACM Press, 273--280, 2003}.

Digital Library

[6]

B. Mutlu, S. Oman, J. Forlizzi and S. Kiesler, "Perceptions of ASIMO," Proceedings of HRI 2006, {ACM Press, 351--352, 2006}.

Digital Library

[7]

C. Breazeal, C. D. Kidd, A. L. Thomaz, G. Hoffman and M. Berlin, "Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork," presented at IROS 2005.

[8]

M. L. Walters, K. Dautenhahn, S. N. Woods and K. L. Koay, "Robot etiquette," Proceeding of HRI 2007 {ACM Press, 317--324, 2007}.

Digital Library

[9]

E. Wang, C. Lignos, A. Vatsal, and B. Scassellati, "Effects of head movement on perceptions of humanoid robot behavior, Proceedings of HRI 2006, 180--185.

Digital Library

[10]

C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2000.

[11]

E. Goffman, E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Anchor Books, 1959.

[12]

L. Takayama, V. Groom, P. Ochi, C. Nass, "I'm sorry Dave: I'm afraid I won't do that: Social aspects of human-agent conflict," Proceeding of Human Factoris in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, 2009.

Digital Library

[13]

C. Torrey, "How robots can help: Communication strategies that improve social outcomes," 2009.

[14]

F. Heider, The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1958.

[15]

L. Ross, "The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings," in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 10, L. Berkowitz, Ed. New York: Academic Press, 1977, pp. 173--220.

[16]

D. T. Miller and M. Ross, "Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?," Psychological Bulletin, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 213--225.

[17]

R. E. Lane, "Moral blame and causal explanation," Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45--58.

[18]

K. Shaver, The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility and Blameworthiness. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1985.

[19]

B. Weiner, Judgements of Responsibility. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 1995.

[20]

W. L. Davis and D. E. Davis, "Internal-external control and attribution of responsibility for success and failure," Journal of Personality, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 123--136.

[21]

V. S. Folkes, "Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 14, pp. 548--565.

[22]

P. D. Sweeney, K. Anderson, S. Bailey, "Attributional style in depression: A meta-analytic view," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 974--991.

[23]

T. Green, R. Bailey, O. Zinser and D. E. Williams, "Causal attribution and affective response as mediated by task performance and self-acceptance," Psychological Reports, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 1555--1562.

[24]

Y. Moon, "Don't blame the computer: When self-disclosure moderates the self-serving bias," Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 125--137.

[25]

I. M. Jonsson, C. Nass, J. Endo, B. Reaves, H. Harris, J. L. Ta, N. Chan, S. Knapp, "Don't blame me I am Only the Driver: Impact of blame attribution on attitudes and attention to driving task," presented at CHI '04.

Digital Library

[26]

B. Mutlu and J. Forlizzi, "Robots in Organizations: Workflow, Social, and Environmental Factors in Human-Robot Interaction," Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Digital Library

Cited By

Li JCuadra AMok BReeves BKaye JJu W(2019)Communicating Dominance in a Nonanthropomorphic Robot Using LocomotionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/33103578:1(1-14)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3310357
Wächter LLindner FImai MNorman TSklar EKomatsu T(2018)An Explorative Comparison of Blame Attributions to Companion Robots Across Various Moral DilemmasProceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3284432.3284463(269-276)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3284432.3284463
Hoffman GForlizzi JAyal SSteinfeld AAntanitis JHochman GHochendoner EFinkenaur JAdams JSmart WMutlu BTakayama L(2015)Robot Presence and Human HonestyProceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/2696454.2696487(181-188)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2696454.2696487
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Critic, compatriot, or chump?: responses to robot blame attribution
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

"I think you are doing a bad job!": The Effect of Blame Attribution by a Robot in Human-Robot Collaboration
HRI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Robots will increasingly collaborate with human partners necessitating research into how robots negotiate negative collaborative outcomes. This study investigates the effect of blame attribution on trust assessments in human-robot collaboration. ...
What a Thing to Say! Which Linguistic Politeness Strategies Should Robots Use in Noncompliance Interactions?
HRI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

For social robots to succeed in human environments, they must respond in effective yet appropriate ways when humans violate social and moral norms, e.g., when humans give them unethical commands. Humans expect robots to be competent and proportional in ...
Integrating robot ethics and machine morality: the study and design of moral competence in robots

Robot ethics encompasses ethical questions about how humans should design, deploy, and treat robots; machine morality encompasses questions about what moral capacities a robot should have and how these capacities could be computationally implemented. ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

HRI '10: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction

March 2010

400 pages

ISBN:9781424448937

General Chairs:
Pamela Hinds
Stanford University, USA
,
Hiroshi Ishiguro
Osaka University, Japan
,
Program Chairs:
Takayuki Kanda
ATR, Japan
,
Peter Kahn
University of Washington, USA

Sponsors

Publisher

IEEE Press

Publication History

Published: 02 March 2010

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

HRI 10

Sponsor:

HRI 10: International Conference on Human Robot Interaction

March 2 - 5, 2010

Osaka, Japan

Acceptance Rates

HRI '10 Paper Acceptance Rate 26 of 124 submissions, 21%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

5
Total Citations
View Citations
351
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)9
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Li JCuadra AMok BReeves BKaye JJu W(2019)Communicating Dominance in a Nonanthropomorphic Robot Using LocomotionACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/33103578:1(1-14)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3310357
Wächter LLindner FImai MNorman TSklar EKomatsu T(2018)An Explorative Comparison of Blame Attributions to Companion Robots Across Various Moral DilemmasProceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3284432.3284463(269-276)Online publication date: 4-Dec-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3284432.3284463
Hoffman GForlizzi JAyal SSteinfeld AAntanitis JHochman GHochendoner EFinkenaur JAdams JSmart WMutlu BTakayama L(2015)Robot Presence and Human HonestyProceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/2696454.2696487(181-188)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2696454.2696487
Li JJu WNass CAdams JSmart WMutlu BTakayama L(2015)Observer Perception of Dominance and Mirroring Behavior in Human-Robot RelationshipsProceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/2696454.2696459(133-140)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2696454.2696459
You SNie JSuh KSundar SBillard AKahn PAdams JTrafton G(2011)When the robot criticizes you...Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction10.1145/1957656.1957778(295-296)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2011
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1957656.1957778

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten