skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753601acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Passing on & putting to rest: understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

While it can be a delicate and emotionally-laden topic, new technological trends compel us to confront a range of problems and issues about death and bereavement. This area presents complex challenges and the associated literature is extensive. In this paper we offer a way of slicing through several perspectives in the social sciences to see clearly a set of salient issues related to bereavement. Following this, we present a theoretical lens to provide a way of conceptualizing how the HCI community could begin to approach such issues. We then report field evidence from 11 in-depth interviews conducted with bereaved participants and apply the proposed lens to unpack key emergent problems and tensions. We conclude with a discussion on how the HCI design space might be sensitized to better support the social processes that unfold when bereavement occurs.

References

  1. Bell G. 2006. No More SMS For Jesus: Ubicomp, Religion, and Techno-spiritual Practices. In Proc. Of Ubicomp 2006. 141--158. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rochberg-Halton, E. 1981. The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Danforth, L. 1982. The Death Rituals of Rural Greece. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dow, S. et al. 2005. Exploring spatial narratives and mixed reality experiences in Oakland Cemetery. ACE '05, 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Durkheim, E. 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Finch, J., Mason, J. 2000. Passing On: Kinship & Inheritance in England. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Foong, P. S. 2008. Designing technology for sensitive contexts: supporting end-of-life decision making. In Proc. of OZCHI '08, 172--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Foong P.S. & Kera D. 2008. Applying reflective design to digital memorials. SIMTech '08. Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Frohlich, D., Murphy, R. 2000. The Memory Box. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 4, 4, 238--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Golden, A., Dalgleish, T., Mackintosh, B. 2007. Levels of Specificity of Autobiographical Memories and of Biographical Memories of the Deceased in Bereaved Individuals With and Without Complicated Grief. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 116, 4, 786--795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Green, J. 2008. Beyond the Good Death, Philadelphia, University Of Pennsylvania Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hallam, E., Hockey, J. 2001. Death, Memory and Material Culture, Oxford, Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hertz, R., 1960. A Contribution to the Study of the Collective Representation of Death, in Death and the Right Hand, Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 27--86Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurst, A. Mankoff, J., Dey, A., Hudson, S. 2007. Dirty Desktops: using a patina of magnetic mouse dust to make common interactor targets easier to select. In Proc. of UIST '07, 183--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kaye, J. 'J'. et al. 2006. To have and to hold: exploring the personal archive. In Proc. of CHI '06, 275--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kirk, D., Banks, R. 2008. On the Design of Technology Heirlooms. SIMTech '08, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirk, D., Sellen, A. 2010, in press. On Human Remains: Values and Practice in the Home Archiving of Cherished Objects. To Appear in ACM TOCHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kubler-Ross. 1969. On Death & Dying. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kubler-Ross, E. 2005. On Grief and Grieving. Schuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lachut, S. 2009. Digital Immortality & Death 2.0, PSFK last accessed 9/16/09 http://www.psfk.com/2009/08/digital-immortality-and-death-20.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Malinowski, B. 1948. Magic, Science, and Religion. New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Massimi, M. and Charise, A. 2009. Dying, death, and mortality: towards thanatosensitivity in HCI. In Ext. Abs of CHI '09, 2459--2468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Miller, D., Parrot, F. 2009. Loss and material culture in south London. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol 15, 3, 502--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Odom, W. Pierce, J., Stolterman, E., Blevis, E. 2009. Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. In Proc. of CHI '09, 1053--1062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Petrelli, D., van den Hoven, E., Whittaker, S. 2009. Making history: intentional capture of future memories. In Proc. of CHI '09, 1723--1732. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Petrelli, D., Whittaker, S., and Brockmeier, J. 2008. AutoTopography: what can physical mementos tell us about digital memories? In Proc. Of CHI '08, 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Prigerson et al. 2009. Prolonged Grief Disorder: Psychometric Validation of Criteria Proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Med 6(8): e1000121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. 1933. The Andaman islanders. Cambridge The University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Seale, C. 1998. Constructing Death: The Sociology of Dying and Bereavement. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sellen, A. et al. 2007. Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past?: an experimental study using sensecam. In Proc. of CHI '07, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sudnow, D. 1967. Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Uriu, D. et al. 2006. MASTABA: the household shrine in the future. In SIGGRAPH 2006, 151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. van den Hoven, E. et al. 2008. Communicating commemoration. In Proc. of SIMTech '08. Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. van Gennep, A. 1977. The Rites of Passage. Routeledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Wyche, S., Grinter, R. 2009. Extraordinary computing: religion as a lens for reconsidering the home. In Proc. of CHI '09, 749--758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Passing on & putting to rest: understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2690 pages
      ISBN:9781605589299
      DOI:10.1145/1753326

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader