skip to main content
article
Free Access

Efficient decomposition methods for the analysis of multi-facility blocking models

Published:01 July 1994Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Three new decomposition methods are developed for the exact analysis of stochastic multi-facility blocking models of the product-form type. The first is a basic decomposition algorithm that reduces the analysis of blocking probabilities to that of two separate subsystems. The second is a generalized M-subsystem decomposition method. The third is a more elaborate and efficient incremental decomposition technique. All of the algorithms exploit the sparsity of locality that can be found in the demand matrix of a system. By reducing the analysis to that of a set of subsystems, the overall dimensionality of the problem is diminished and the computational requirements are reduced significantly. This enables the efficient computation of blocking probabilities in large systems. Several numerical examples are provided to illustrate the computational savings that can be realized.

References

  1. ~AEIN, J. 1978. A multi-user-class blocked calls cleared demand access model. IEEE Trans. ~Commun. 26, 3, 378-385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ~AEIN, J., AND KOSOVYCH, S. 1977. Satellite capacity allocation. IEEE Proc. 65, 3, 332 342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ~ARTHURS, E., AND KAUFMAN, J. 1979. Sizing a message store subject to blocking criteria. In ~Performance of Computer Systems. M. Arato, A. Butrimenko, and E. Gelenbe, eds., North-Hol- ~land, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 547 564. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ~BARBERIS, G., AND BRIGNOLO, R. 1982. Capacity allocation in a DAMA satellite system. IEEE ~Trans. Conzmun. 30, 7, 1750-1757.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ~BURMAN, D. Y., LEHOCZKY, J. P., AND LIM, Y. 1984. Insensitivity of blocking probabilities in a ~circuit-switching network. J. Appl. Prob. 21,850-859.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ~CONWA~', A. E., AND GEORGANAS, N. D. 1989, Queueing Networks-Exact Computattonal Algo- ~rittnns: A Untried Theory Based on Decomposttion and Aggregauon. The MIT Press, Cambridge, ~Mass. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ~COURTOIS, P. J. 1977. Deconzposabdity: Queuebzg and Computer Systenz Applications. Academic ~Press, Orlando, Fla.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ~DZIONG, Z., AND ROBERTS, J. W. 1987. Congestion probabilities in a circuit-switched integrated ~services network. Perf. Eval., 7, 267-284. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ~FOSCmNI, G., AND GOPINATH, B. 1983. Sharing memory optimally. IEEE Trans. Commun. 31, 3, ~352 360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ~FREDRIKSON, G. 1974. Analysis of channel utilization in traffic concentrators. IEEE Trans. ~Commun. 22, 8, 1122 1129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ~GERSHT, A., AND LEE, K. 1988. Virtual circuit load control in fast packet-switched broadband ~networks. In Proceedbzgs oflEEE INFOCOM'88 (Miami, Fla.). IEEE, New York, pp. 214-220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. ~GIRARD, A., AND OUIMET, Y. 1983. End-to-end blocking for circuit switched networks: Polyno-mial algorithms for some special cases, iEEE Trans. Commun. 31, 12, 1269-1273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. ~HOLTZMANN, J. 1971. Analysis of dependence effects in telephone trunking networks. Bell Syst. ~Tech. J. 50, 8, 2647-2662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. ~JAFARI, A., SAADAWI, T., AND SCHWARTZ, M. 1986. Blocking probability in two-way distributed ~circuit-switched CATV. 1EEE Trans. Commun, 34, 10, 977 984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. ~JORDAN, S., AND VARAIYA, P. P. 1991. Throughput in multiple service, multiple resource ~communication networks. IEEE Trans. Commun 39, 8, 1216-1222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. ~KATZ, S. 1967. Statistical performance analysis of a switched communication network. In ~Proceedmgs of the 5th Internatzonal Teletraffic Congress (New York, N.Y.). pp. 566 575.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. ~KAUFMAN, J. 1981. Blocking in a shared resource environment. IEEE Trans. Commun. 29, 10, ~pp. 1474-1481.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. ~KAUFMAN, J. 1992. Blocking with retrials in a completely shared resource environment. Perf. ~Ecal. 15, 99-113. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ~KELLY, F. P. 1979. Reversbthty and Stochasnc Nem,orks. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. ~KELLY, F. P. 1986. Blocking probabilities m large circmt-switched networks. Adv. Appl. Prob., ~10, 473-505.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. ~KELLY, F. P. 1991.Loss networks. Ann. AppL Prob., 1, 3, 319-378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. ~LAM, g. S., AND LIEN, Y. L. 1983. A trcc convolution algorithm for the solution of qucueing ~networks. Commun. ACM, 26, 203 215. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. ~LIN, P., LEON, B., AND STEWART, C. 1978. Analysis of circuit switched networks employing ~originating-office control with spill-over. {EEE Trans. Conzmun. 26, 6, 754-765.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. 1986. Some results from an asymptotic analysis of a class of simple circuit-switched ~networks. In Teletra~ir Analysis and Computer Performance Evahtation. O. J. Boxma, J. W. ~Cohen, and H. C. Toms, eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 47-61. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. ~PINSKY, E., AND CONWAY, A. E. 1990. Performance analysis of sharing policies for broadband ~networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ITC Seminar on Broadband Technologies (Morristown, N.J., ~Oct.). pp. 11.4.1 11.4.8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. ~PINSKY, E., AND CONWA'~, A. E. 1992a. Computational algorithms for blocking probabilities in circuit-switched networks. Ann. Oper. Res. 35, 31 41. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. ~PINSKY, E., AND CONWAY, A. E. 1992b. Exact computation of blocking probabilities in state-de- ~pendent multi-facility blocking models. In Performance of Distrtbuted Systems and Integrated ~Communication Networks. T. Hasegawa, H. Takagi, and Y. Takahashi, eds. North-Holland, ~Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 383-392. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. ~ROSS, K., AND TSANG, D. 1990. Teletraffic engineering for product-form circuit switched net- ~works. Adv. Appl. Prob., 22, 3, pp. 657-675.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. ~ROSS, K. AND WANG, J. 1990. Solving product form stochastic networks with Monte Carlo ~summation. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference. 0. Balci, R. Sadowski, R. ~Nance, eds. IEEE, New York, pp. 270-275. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. ~RUBIN, I., AND LEE, J. 1988. Performance analysis of interconnected metropolitan area circuit- ~switched telecommunications networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 36, 2, 171-185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. ~SIMON, H. h., AND ANDO, A. 1961. Aggregation of variables in dynamic systems. Econometriea ~29, pp. 111-138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. ~STALLINGS, W. 1992. ISDN and Broadband ISDN, Macmillan, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. ~TSANG, D., AND ROSS, K. 1990. Algorithms to determine exact blocking probabilities for ~multi-rate tree networks. IEEE Trans. Commun., 38, 8, 1266-1271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. ~WniTT, W. 1985. Blocking when service is required from several facilities simultaneously. Bell ~Syst. Techo J., 64, 8, 1807-1856.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Efficient decomposition methods for the analysis of multi-facility blocking models

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader