Abstract
Three new decomposition methods are developed for the exact analysis of stochastic multi-facility blocking models of the product-form type. The first is a basic decomposition algorithm that reduces the analysis of blocking probabilities to that of two separate subsystems. The second is a generalized M-subsystem decomposition method. The third is a more elaborate and efficient incremental decomposition technique. All of the algorithms exploit the sparsity of locality that can be found in the demand matrix of a system. By reducing the analysis to that of a set of subsystems, the overall dimensionality of the problem is diminished and the computational requirements are reduced significantly. This enables the efficient computation of blocking probabilities in large systems. Several numerical examples are provided to illustrate the computational savings that can be realized.
- ~AEIN, J. 1978. A multi-user-class blocked calls cleared demand access model. IEEE Trans. ~Commun. 26, 3, 378-385.Google Scholar
- ~AEIN, J., AND KOSOVYCH, S. 1977. Satellite capacity allocation. IEEE Proc. 65, 3, 332 342.Google Scholar
- ~ARTHURS, E., AND KAUFMAN, J. 1979. Sizing a message store subject to blocking criteria. In ~Performance of Computer Systems. M. Arato, A. Butrimenko, and E. Gelenbe, eds., North-Hol- ~land, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 547 564. Google Scholar
- ~BARBERIS, G., AND BRIGNOLO, R. 1982. Capacity allocation in a DAMA satellite system. IEEE ~Trans. Conzmun. 30, 7, 1750-1757.Google Scholar
- ~BURMAN, D. Y., LEHOCZKY, J. P., AND LIM, Y. 1984. Insensitivity of blocking probabilities in a ~circuit-switching network. J. Appl. Prob. 21,850-859.Google Scholar
- ~CONWA~', A. E., AND GEORGANAS, N. D. 1989, Queueing Networks-Exact Computattonal Algo- ~rittnns: A Untried Theory Based on Decomposttion and Aggregauon. The MIT Press, Cambridge, ~Mass. Google Scholar
- ~COURTOIS, P. J. 1977. Deconzposabdity: Queuebzg and Computer Systenz Applications. Academic ~Press, Orlando, Fla.Google Scholar
- ~DZIONG, Z., AND ROBERTS, J. W. 1987. Congestion probabilities in a circuit-switched integrated ~services network. Perf. Eval., 7, 267-284. Google Scholar
- ~FOSCmNI, G., AND GOPINATH, B. 1983. Sharing memory optimally. IEEE Trans. Commun. 31, 3, ~352 360.Google Scholar
- ~FREDRIKSON, G. 1974. Analysis of channel utilization in traffic concentrators. IEEE Trans. ~Commun. 22, 8, 1122 1129.Google Scholar
- ~GERSHT, A., AND LEE, K. 1988. Virtual circuit load control in fast packet-switched broadband ~networks. In Proceedbzgs oflEEE INFOCOM'88 (Miami, Fla.). IEEE, New York, pp. 214-220.Google Scholar
- ~GIRARD, A., AND OUIMET, Y. 1983. End-to-end blocking for circuit switched networks: Polyno-mial algorithms for some special cases, iEEE Trans. Commun. 31, 12, 1269-1273.Google Scholar
- ~HOLTZMANN, J. 1971. Analysis of dependence effects in telephone trunking networks. Bell Syst. ~Tech. J. 50, 8, 2647-2662.Google Scholar
- ~JAFARI, A., SAADAWI, T., AND SCHWARTZ, M. 1986. Blocking probability in two-way distributed ~circuit-switched CATV. 1EEE Trans. Commun, 34, 10, 977 984.Google Scholar
- ~JORDAN, S., AND VARAIYA, P. P. 1991. Throughput in multiple service, multiple resource ~communication networks. IEEE Trans. Commun 39, 8, 1216-1222.Google Scholar
- ~KATZ, S. 1967. Statistical performance analysis of a switched communication network. In ~Proceedmgs of the 5th Internatzonal Teletraffic Congress (New York, N.Y.). pp. 566 575.Google Scholar
- ~KAUFMAN, J. 1981. Blocking in a shared resource environment. IEEE Trans. Commun. 29, 10, ~pp. 1474-1481.Google Scholar
- ~KAUFMAN, J. 1992. Blocking with retrials in a completely shared resource environment. Perf. ~Ecal. 15, 99-113. Google Scholar
- ~KELLY, F. P. 1979. Reversbthty and Stochasnc Nem,orks. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
- ~KELLY, F. P. 1986. Blocking probabilities m large circmt-switched networks. Adv. Appl. Prob., ~10, 473-505.Google Scholar
- ~KELLY, F. P. 1991.Loss networks. Ann. AppL Prob., 1, 3, 319-378.Google Scholar
- ~LAM, g. S., AND LIEN, Y. L. 1983. A trcc convolution algorithm for the solution of qucueing ~networks. Commun. ACM, 26, 203 215. Google Scholar
- ~LIN, P., LEON, B., AND STEWART, C. 1978. Analysis of circuit switched networks employing ~originating-office control with spill-over. {EEE Trans. Conzmun. 26, 6, 754-765.Google Scholar
- D. 1986. Some results from an asymptotic analysis of a class of simple circuit-switched ~networks. In Teletra~ir Analysis and Computer Performance Evahtation. O. J. Boxma, J. W. ~Cohen, and H. C. Toms, eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 47-61. Google Scholar
- ~PINSKY, E., AND CONWAY, A. E. 1990. Performance analysis of sharing policies for broadband ~networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ITC Seminar on Broadband Technologies (Morristown, N.J., ~Oct.). pp. 11.4.1 11.4.8.Google Scholar
- ~PINSKY, E., AND CONWA'~, A. E. 1992a. Computational algorithms for blocking probabilities in circuit-switched networks. Ann. Oper. Res. 35, 31 41. Google Scholar
- ~PINSKY, E., AND CONWAY, A. E. 1992b. Exact computation of blocking probabilities in state-de- ~pendent multi-facility blocking models. In Performance of Distrtbuted Systems and Integrated ~Communication Networks. T. Hasegawa, H. Takagi, and Y. Takahashi, eds. North-Holland, ~Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 383-392. Google Scholar
- ~ROSS, K., AND TSANG, D. 1990. Teletraffic engineering for product-form circuit switched net- ~works. Adv. Appl. Prob., 22, 3, pp. 657-675.Google Scholar
- ~ROSS, K. AND WANG, J. 1990. Solving product form stochastic networks with Monte Carlo ~summation. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference. 0. Balci, R. Sadowski, R. ~Nance, eds. IEEE, New York, pp. 270-275. Google Scholar
- ~RUBIN, I., AND LEE, J. 1988. Performance analysis of interconnected metropolitan area circuit- ~switched telecommunications networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 36, 2, 171-185.Google Scholar
- ~SIMON, H. h., AND ANDO, A. 1961. Aggregation of variables in dynamic systems. Econometriea ~29, pp. 111-138.Google Scholar
- ~STALLINGS, W. 1992. ISDN and Broadband ISDN, Macmillan, New York. Google Scholar
- ~TSANG, D., AND ROSS, K. 1990. Algorithms to determine exact blocking probabilities for ~multi-rate tree networks. IEEE Trans. Commun., 38, 8, 1266-1271.Google Scholar
- ~WniTT, W. 1985. Blocking when service is required from several facilities simultaneously. Bell ~Syst. Techo J., 64, 8, 1807-1856.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Efficient decomposition methods for the analysis of multi-facility blocking models
Recommendations
The decomposition of a blocking model for connection-oriented networks
Two general-purpose decomposition methods to calculate the blocking probabilities of connection-oriented networks are presented. The methods are based on either the call status or the link status of the networks, and can significantly reduce the ...
Exact Analysis of the State-Dependent Polling Model
We consider a polling model in which a number of queues are served, in cyclic order, by a single server. Each queue has its own distinct Poisson arrival stream, service time, and switchover time (the server's travel time from that queue to the next) ...
Modeling and Performance Analysis of a Finite-Buffer Queue with Batch Arrivals, Batch Services, and Setup Times: The MX/GY/1/K + B Queue with Setup Times
In this paper, we consider a finite-buffer MX/GY/1/K + B queue with setup times, which has a wide range of applications. The primary purpose of this paper is to discuss both exact analytic and computational aspects of this system. For this purpose, we ...
Comments