ABSTRACT
Selecting an evaluation method for product evaluations depends on many issues, such as the development stage of the product, time schedule, resources, and money that can be invested on the evaluation. The user testing and expert review methods are probably the most common ones when productivity software is being evaluated. Conducting a playtesting with players is commonly used by game designers, but the expert review method has not received that much attention, although it has proven to be an efficient and useful method. In this paper, we present a comparison study of the playtesting and expert review methods in mobile game evaluation. Our objective is to compare the effectiveness of the expert review method with playtesting. Results indicate that the expert review method is able to identify playability problems as accurately as playtesting, but in addition, it identifies problems that are crucial for the playability of the game.
- Adams, E., Rollings, A. Game Design and Development: Fundamentals of Game Design. Prentice Hall, 2007 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Baauw, E., Bekker, M. M., Barendregt, W. A Structured Expert Evaluation Method for the Evaluation of Children's Computer Games. In proc INTERACT, (2005), 457--469 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., Toth, J. A. Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games. In proc CHI Extended Abstracts, ACM Press (2004), 1509--1512 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Drachen, A., Canossa, A. Towards gameplay analysis via gameplay metrics. In proc MindTrek, ACM (2009), 202--209 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dumas, J. S., Loring, B. Moderating Usability Tests: Principles & Practices for Interacting. Morgan-Kaufmann, 2008 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Federoff, M. A. Heuristics and Usability Guidelines for the Creation and Evaluation of Fun in Video Games. Indiana University, 2002Google Scholar
- Fullerton, T., Swain, C., Hoffman, S. Game Design Workshop: Designing, Prototyping, and Playtesting Games. CMP Books, 2004 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gray, W. D., Salzman, M. C. Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods. 13, 3 (1998), 203--261 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, J. H., Gunn, D. V., Schuh, E., Phillips, B., Pagulayan, R. J., Wixon, D. Tracking real-time user experience (TRUE): a comprehensive instrumentation solution for complex systems. In proc CHI, ACM (2008), 443--452 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Korhonen, H., Koivisto, E. M. I. Playability Heuristics for Mobile Game. In proc MobileHCI, ACM Press (2006), 9--16 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Korhonen, H., Paavilainen, J., Saarenpää, H. Expert Review Method in Game Evaluations -- Comparison of Two Playability Heuristic Sets. In proc MindTrek, ACM Press (2009), 74--81 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laitinen, S. Do usability expert evaluation and test provide novel and useful data for game development? JUS 1, 2 (2006), 64--75Google Scholar
- Molich, R., Dumas, J. S. Comparative Usability Evaluation (CUE-4). BIT 27, 3 (2008), 263--281 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Molich, R., Kaasgaard, K., Karyukin, B. Comparative Usability Evaluation. BIT 23, 1 (2004), 65--74 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mulligan, J., Patrovsky, B. Developing Online Games: An Insider's Guide. New Riders, 2003 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In proc CHI, ACM Press (1992), 373--380 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. Heuristic Evaluation. in Usability Inspection Methods, Nielsen, J., Mack, R. (Eds) Wiley & Sons (1994), 25--62 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Academic Press, 1994 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. Usability inspection methods. In proc CHI Extended Abstracts, ACM (1994). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J., Molich, R. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In proc CHI, ACM (1990), 249--256 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J., Phillips, V. L. Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: heuristic, formal, and empirical methods compared. In proc CHI, ACM (1993), 214--221 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pagulayan, R. J., Keeker, K., Wixon, D., Romero, R. L., Fuller, T. User-centered Design in Games. in Handbook for Human-Computer Interaction in Interactive Systems., Jacko, J., Sears, A. (Eds) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (2003), 883--906 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pinelle, S., Wong, N., Stach, T. Heuristic evaluation for games: usability principles for video game design. In proc CHI, ACM Press (2008), 1453--1462 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rouse, R. Game Design: Theory and Practice. Wordware Publishing, 2001 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rubin, J. Handbook of Usability Testing: How to plan, design and conduct effective tests. John Wiley & Sons, 1994 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schell, J. The Art of Game Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2008Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tan, W.-s., Liu, D., Bishu, R. Web evaluation: Heuristic evaluation vs. User Testing. 39, 4 (2009), 621--627Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Comparison of playtesting and expert review methods in mobile game evaluation
Recommendations
A Postmortem on Playtesting: Exploring the Impact of Playtesting on the Critical Reception of Video Games
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsGame studios aim to develop titles that deliver a fun and engaging experience for players. Playtesting promises to help identify opportunities to improve player experience and assist developers in achieving their design intent. However, a lack of ...
Playtesting with a Purpose
CHI PLAY '16: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlayPlaytesting, or using play to guide game design, gives designers feedback about whether their game is meeting their goals and the player's expectations. We report a case study of designing, deploying, and iterating on a series of playtesting workshops ...
Playtesting for indie studios
AcademicMindtrek '16: Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek ConferenceCreating video games is a lengthy and demanding process. Financial success for games studios often depends on making games that deliver a fun and engaging experience for a diverse audience of players. Therefore, understanding how players interact and ...
Comments