skip to main content
10.1145/1833349.1778831acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Non-local scan consolidation for 3D urban scenes

Published:26 July 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in scanning technologies, in particular devices that extract depth through active sensing, allow fast scanning of urban scenes. Such rapid acquisition incurs imperfections: large regions remain missing, significant variation in sampling density is common, and the data is often corrupted with noise and outliers. However, buildings often exhibit large scale repetitions and self-similarities. Detecting, extracting, and utilizing such large scale repetitions provide powerful means to consolidate the imperfect data. Our key observation is that the same geometry, when scanned multiple times over reoccurrences of instances, allow application of a simple yet effective non-local filtering. The multiplicity of the geometry is fused together and projected to a base-geometry defined by clustering corresponding surfaces. Denoising is applied by separating the process into off-plane and in-plane phases. We show that the consolidation of the reoccurrences provides robust denoising and allow reliable completion of missing parts. We present evaluation results of the algorithm on several LiDAR scans of buildings of varying complexity and styles.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

tp121-10.mp4

mp4

29.2 MB

References

  1. Aiger, D., Mitra, N. J., and Cohen-Or, D. 2008. 4-points congruent sets for robust surface registration. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 27, 3, #85, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Besl, P., and McKay, N. 1992. A method for registration of 3D. In IEEE PAMI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Biber, P., and Strasser, W. 2006. nscan-matching: Simultaneous matching of multiple scans and application to slam. In In Robotics and Automation, 2270--2276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bokeloh, M., Berner, A., Wand, M., Seidel, H.-P., and Schilling, A. 2009. Symmetry detection using line features. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Buades, A., Coll, B., and Morel, J.-M. 2005. A non-local algorithm for image denoising. In Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vis. and Pat. Rec., 60--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Buades, A., Coll, B., and Morel, J.-M. 2008. Nonlocal image and movie denoising. Int. J. Comp. Vis. 76, 2, 123--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dabov, Foi, Katkovnik, and Egiazarian. 2007. Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform-domain collaborative filtering. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on 16, 8, 2080--2095. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Debevec, P. E., Taylor, C. J., and Malik, J. 1996. Modeling and rendering arch. from photographs: A hybrid geometry- and image-based approach. Proc. SIGGRAPH 30, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fleishman, S., Drori, I., and Cohen-Or, D. 2003. Bilateral mesh denoising. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 22, 3, 950--953. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gal, R., Shamir, A., Hassner, T., Pauly, M., and Cohen-Or, D. 2007. Surface reconstruction using local shape priors. In Proc. of Eurographics Symp. on Geometry Processing, 253--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hays, J. H., Leordeanu, M., Efros, A. A., and Liu, Y. 2006. Discovering texture regularity as a higher-order correspondence problem. In Proc. Euro. Conf. on Comp. Vis. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Huang, H., Li, D., Zhang, H., Ascher, U., and Cohen-Or, D. 2009. Consolidation of unorganized point clouds for surface reconstruction. ACM Trans. Graph. 28, 5, Article 176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jones, T. R., Durand, F., and Desbrun, M. 2003. Noniterative, feature-preserving mesh smoothing. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 943--949. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Korah, T., and Rasmussen, C. 2007. 2d lattice extraction from structured environments. In ICIP, 61--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Korah, T., and Rasmussen, C. 2008. Analysis of building textures for reconstructing partially occluded facades. In Proc. Euro. Conf. on Comp. Vis., 359--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Levoy, M., Pulli, K., Curless, B., Rusinkiewicz, S., Koller, D., Pereira, L., Ginzton, M., Anderson, S., Davis, J., Ginsberg, J., Shade, J., and Fulk, D. 2000. The digital michelangelo project: 3d scanning of large statues. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, 131--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lindenbaum, M., Fischer, M., and Bruckstein, A. M. 1994. On gabor's contribution to image enhancement. Pattern Recognition 27, 1, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Lipman, Y., Cohen-Or, D., Levin, D., and Tal-Ezer, H. 2007. Parameterization-free projection for geometry reconstruction. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Liu, Y., Collins, R. T., and Tsin, Y. 2004. A computational model for periodic pattern perception based on frieze and wallpaper groups. IEEE PAMI 26, 3, 354--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Liu, Y., Lin, W.-C., and Hays, J. H. 2004. Near regular texture analysis and manipulation. 368--376.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Merritt, F., and Ricketts, J. 2001. Building Design and Construction Handbook, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitra, N. J., Guibas, L., and Pauly, M. 2006. Partial and approximate symmetry detection for 3d geometry. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, vol. 25, 560--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Müller, P., Zeng, G., Wonka, P., and Gool, L. J. V. 2007. Image-based procedural modeling of facades. ACM Trans. on Graphics 26, 3, 85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Musialski, P., Wonka, P., Recheis, M., Maierhofer, S., and Purgathofer, W. 2009. Symmetry-based facade repair. In Vision, Modeling, and Visualization Workshop 2009 in Braunschweig, Germany (VMV09).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Oztireli, C., Guennebaud, G., and Gross, M. 2009. Feature preserving point set surfaces based on non-linear kernel regression. Proc. Eurographics) 28, 2, 493--501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Park, M., Brocklehurst, K., Collins, R. T., and Liu, Y. 2009. Deformed lattice detection in real-world images using mean-shift belief propagation. IEEE PAMI 31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pauly, M., Mitra, N. J., Giesen, J., Gross, M., and Guibas, L. 2005. Example-based 3d scan completion. In Proc. of Symp. of Geometry Processing, 23--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pauly, M., Mitra, N. J., Wallner, J., Pottmann, H., and Guibas, L. 2008. Discovering structural regularity in 3D geometry. ACM Trans. on Graphics 27, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Perona, P., and Malik, J. 1990. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 12, 7, 629--639. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., and Fatemi, E. 1992. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D 60, 1--4, 259--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Schaffalitzky, F., and Zisserman, A. 1999. Geometric grouping of repeated elements within images. In Shape, Contour and Grouping in Computer Vision, 165--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Schnabel, R., Degener, P., and Klein, R. 2009. Completion and reconstruction with primitive shapes. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. of Eurographics) 28, 2, 503--512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Tomasi, C., and Manduchi, R. 1998. Bilateral filtering for gray and color images. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Comp. Vis., 839. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Wang, X., Totaro, S., Taill, F., Hanson, A. R., and Teller, S. 2002. Recovering facade texture and microstructure from real-world images. In Texture Analysis and Synth., 381--386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiao, J., Fang, T., Zhao, P., Lhuillier, M., and Quan, L. 2009. Image-based street-side city modeling. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2009 papers, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yoshizawa, S., Belyaev, A., and Seidel, H.-P. 2006. Smoothing by example: Mesh denoising by averaging with similarity-based weights. In SMI, 38--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yu, Y., Ferencz, A., and Malik, J. 2001. Extracting objects from range and radiance images. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 7, 4, 351--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Non-local scan consolidation for 3D urban scenes

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGGRAPH '10: ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 papers
            July 2010
            984 pages
            ISBN:9781450302104
            DOI:10.1145/1833349

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 26 July 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGGRAPH '10 Paper Acceptance Rate103of390submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            SIGGRAPH '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader