ABSTRACT
Many web-based services utilize both desktop and mobile terminals in delivering content and functionality to their users. In terms of user experience (UX), the overall chain of interactions, including mobile and non-mobile settings, becomes a central design target. The aim of this study was to investigate, what are the key elements of user experience associated with these, cross-platform interactions. This paper presents the findings from a four week long field study with three web-based cross-platform services. During the study, participants used the services on both their PCs and mobile devices. Diaries and interviews were used for gathering users' experiences with the services. Based on our findings and reflection with related work, we argue that central elements of cross-platform service UX include fit for cross-contextual activities, flow of interactions and content, and perceived service coherence. We propose an initial conceptual framework of cross-platform user experience. The framework can be used to guide the design of cross-platform web services, as it draws attention to elements of user experience that are essentially influenced by the characteristics of cross-platform settings.
- Banavar, G. and Bernstein, A. 2002. Software Infrastructure and Design Challenges for Ubiquitous Computing Applications. Communications of the ACM 45(12), 92--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bång, M. Larsson, A. Berglund, E. Eriksson, H. 2005. Distributed user interfaces for clinical ubiquitous computing applications. International Journal of Medical Informatics, Volume 74, Issue 7, Pages 545--551.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, G., and Kotz, D. 2000. A Survey of Context-Aware Mobile Computing Research. Technical Report TR2000-381, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, November 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denis C. and Karsenty L. 2004. Inter-usability of multi-device systems - a conc eptual framework. In Seffah A. and Javahery H. (eds.) Multiple User Interfaces: Cross-Platform Applications and Context-Aware Interfaces. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Dubberly, H. and Evenson, S. 2008. The Experience Cycle. Interactions. 15(3). March and April 2008. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Feiner, S.K. 2000. Environment Management for Hybrid User Interfaces. IEEE Personal Communications Oct. 50--53.Google Scholar
- Florins, M. and Vanderdonckt J. 2004. Graceful Degradation of User Interfaces as a Design Method for Multiplaform Systems. Proceedings of the IUI'04, Madeira, Portugal. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. 2004. The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In Funology, from Usability to Enjoyment, pp.31--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jones, M., Marsden, G. 2006. Mobile Interaction Design. Wiley, West Sussex, UK. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luyten, K.; Coninx, K. 2005. Distributed user interface elements to support smart interaction spaces. Proc. 7th IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia. 12--14 Dec. 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. 1989. Coordinating User Interfaces for Consistency. Neuauflage 2002 edn. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies. San Francisco, CA, USA Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nielsen, J. Designing Web Usability. 1999. Peachpitt Press, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oliveira, R., Rocha, H. V. 2005. Towards an Approach for Multi-Device Interface Design. Proc. the Eleventh Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia'05), Pocos de Caldas - Minas Gerais, Brazil, December 5-7, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oulasvirta, A. and Sumari, L. 2007. Mobile kits and laptop trays: Managing multiple devices in mobile information work. Proc. of CHI 2007, ACM Press, NY, pp. 1127--1136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oulasvirta, A. 2008. When Users "Do" the Ubicomp. Interactions. 15(2). March and April 2008. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pyla, S., Tungare, M., Holman, J., Pérez-Quiñones, M. 2009. Continuous User Interfaces for Seamless Task Migration in Human-Computer Interaction. Ambient, Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction. In proc. HCI International 2009, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roto, V. 2006. Web Browsing on Mobile Phones - Characteristics of User Experience. Doctoral Dissertation. TKK Dissertations 49. Helsinki University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Savidis, A. & Stephanidis, C. 2005. Distributed Interface Bits: Dynamic Dialogue Composition from Ambient Computing Resources. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 9(3), pp. 142--168. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schilling, M.A. 2000. Towards a general modular systems theory and its application to inter-firm product modularity. Academy of Management Review, Vol 25, pp. 312--334.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seffah, A. and Javahery, H. 2005. Multiple user interfaces: cross-platform applications and context-aware interfaces. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
- Segerståhl, K. 2008. Utilization of Pervasive IT Compromised? Understanding the Adoption and Use of a Cross Media System. Proc. MUM'08, ACM, 168--175. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Segerståhl, K. 2009. Crossmedia Systems Constructed around Human Activities: A Field Study and Implications for Design. In Proc. INTERACT 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Segerståhl, K. & Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Distributed User Experience in Persuasive Technology Environments. In: Y. de Kort et al. (Eds.), LNCS 4744, Persuasive 2007, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany (2007) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Segerståhl K. & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2008. Mobile Web and the Conceptual Grounds of Extended Information Services. Social Mobile Media Workshop, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, US, August 1, 2008.Google Scholar
- Simon, H. 1962. The Architecture of Complexity. Proc. of the American Philosophical Society, vol 106, pp. 467--782.Google Scholar
- Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Väätäjä, H., Vainio, T. 2008. Opportunities and Challenges of Designing the Service User eXperience (SUX) in Web 2.0.In Saariluoma, P. and Isomäki, H. (Eds.), Future Interaction Design II, Springer.Google Scholar
- Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Segerståhl, K. 2009. A Tool for Evaluating Service User eXperience (ServUX): Development of a Modular Questionnaire. User Experience Evaluation Methods, UXEM'09 Workshop at Interact'09, Uppsala, Sweden, August 25th, 2009.Google Scholar
- Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Wäljas, M. 2009. Developing an Expert Evaluation Method for User eXperience of Cross-Platform Web Services. Proceedings of Mindtrek'09, ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Cross-platform service user experience: a field study and an initial framework
Recommendations
User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality
IHM '08: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-MachineUser Experience (UX) is not just "old wine in new bottles". It is a truly extended and distinct perspective on the quality of interactive technology: away from products and problems to humans and the drivers of positive experience. This paper will ...
Developing an expert evaluation method for user eXperience of cross-platform web services
MindTrek '09: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous EraPositive user experience (UX), including its pragmatic and hedonic aspects, is a central design target for interactive products and services. Increasingly, new types of Web services are developed for both PCs and mobile terminals to support user needs ...
Development of evaluation heuristics for web service user experience
CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsPositive user experience (UX), including its pragmatic and hedonic aspects, is a central design target for interactive products and services. Increasingly, Web services are developed for both PCs and mobile terminals to support user needs for media ...
Comments