skip to main content
10.1145/1858171.1858193acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Materializing energy

Published:16 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivated and informed by perspectives on sustainability and design, this paper draws on a diverse body of scholarly works related to energy and materiality to articulate a perspective on energy-as-materiality and propose a design approach of materializing energy. Three critical themes are presented: the intangibility of energy, the undifferentiatedness of energy, and the availability of energy. Each theme is developed through combination of critical investigation and design exploration, including the development and deployment of several novel design artifacts: Energy Mementos and The Local Energy Lamp. A framework for interacting with energy-as-materiality is proposed involving collecting, keeping, sharing, and activating energy. A number of additional concepts are also introduced, such as energy attachment, energy engagement, energy attunement, local energy and energy meta-data. Our work contributes both a broader, more integrative design perspective on energy and materiality as well as a diversity of more specific concepts and artifacts that may be of service to designers and researchers of interactive systems concerned with sustainability and energy.

References

  1. Backlund, S., Gustafsson, A., Gyllenswärd, M., Ilstedt-Hjelm, 4. S., Mazé, R., & Redströöm, J. (2006). Static! The aesthetics of energy in everyday things. In Proc. of DRSIC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Belk, R. (1991). "Possessions and the Sense of Past." In Russell W. Belk (ed.) Highways and Buyways: Naturalistic Research from the Consumer Behavior Odyssey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Blevis, E. (2007). Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In Proc. of CHI '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and character of contemporary life. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chetty, M., Tran, D., & Grinter, R. (2008). Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home, In Proc. Ubicomp '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Devine-Wright, P. (2006). Energy citizenship: psychological aspects of evolution in sustainable energy technologies. In J. Murphy (ed.) Governance of Sustainable Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobbyn J. & Thomas G. (2005) Seeing the light: the impact of micro-generation on our use of energy. Sustainable Consumption Roundtable, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunne, T. & Raby, F. (2001). Design noir: the secret life of electronic objects. Birkhauser.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Froehlich, J. Findlater, L., & Landay, J. (2010). The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proc. of CHI '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ihde, D. (1998). Technology and the lifeworld. IU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fry, T. (1999). A new design philosophy: an introduction to defuturing. UNSW Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fry, T. (2009). Design futuring: Sustainability, ethics and new practice. Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1):21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Huang, E. M. & Truong, K. N. (2008). Breaking the disposable technology paradigm: opportunities for sustainable interaction design for mobile phones. In Proc. of CHI '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hughes, T. (1983). Networks of power. John Hopkins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleine, S. (2004). An Integrative Review of Material Possession Attachment. Academy of Marketing Sci. Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindsay, B. (1975). Energy: Historical development of the concept. Halsted Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lutenhiser, L., Harris, C., & Olsen, M. (2002). Energy, society, and environment. In Dunlap, R. and Michelson, W. (ed.) Handbook of environmental sociology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mazé R., & Redströöm J. (2008). Switch! Energy Ecologies in Everyday Life. Int. Journal of Design, 22(3): 55--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. McCracken, G. (1988). Culture and Consumption. IU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Odom, W., Pierce, J. Stolterman, E., & Blevis, E. (2009). Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design. In Proc. CHI '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pierce, J., Odom, W., & Blevis, E. (2008). Energy aware dwelling: a critical survey of interaction design for eco-visualizations. In Proc. OZCHI '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pierce, J., Schiano, D., & Paulos, E. (2010). Home, habits and energy: investigating domestic interactions and energy consumption. In Proc. of CHI '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Redström, J. (2005). On Technology as Material in Design. In Willis, A-M. (ed.) Design Philosophy Papers, Collection Two:31--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosa, E., Machlis, G., & Keating, K. (1988). "Energy and Society", Annual Review of Sociology 14:149--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. (2005). Reflective design. In Proc. Critical Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the social organisation of normality. Berg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Stern, P. & Aronson, E. (ed.) (1984). Energy use: The human dimension. Freeman and Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Strengers, Y. (2008). Smart metering demand management programs: challenging the comfort and cleanliness habitus of households. In Proc. OZCHI '08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Verbeek, P-P. (2005). What Things Do -- Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wakkary, R. & Tanenbaum, K. (2009). A sustainable identity: the creativity of an everyday designer. In Proc. CHI '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Woodward, I. (2007). Understanding material culture. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. of CHI '07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Materializing energy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      DIS '10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
      August 2010
      457 pages
      ISBN:9781450301039
      DOI:10.1145/1858171

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 August 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader