skip to main content
10.1145/1868914.1868937acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Extending boundaries with meta-design and cultures of participation

Published:16 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Human-computer interaction (HCI) has refocused many research efforts within computer science from a technology-centered view to a human-centered view. The developments so far, however, have seen humans mostly as users and consumers rather than as active contributors and designers.

This paper provides a conceptual framework based on meta-design and cultures of participation that democratize design and allows all stakeholders to evolve systems to fit their needs. It establishes a new extended discourse for HCI research in which information technologies are interwoven with human lives in all aspects of our existence (at home, working, teaching, learning, and being a citizen). Specific socio-technical environments instantiating the framework in different application domains are described, including: (1) environments for people with cognitive disabilities, (2) table-top computing systems for framing and solving complex urban planning problems, (3) modeling the buildings of the world in 3D, and (4) using Smart Grids to support energy sustainability. These examples show how metadesign and cultures of participation are design approaches that allow researchers and practitioners to extend boundaries by allowing all stakeholders to have more control over their artifacts and by providing opportunities to encourage and to support contributions by many people in personally meaningful activities.

References

  1. Alexander, C. The state of the art in design methods. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984, 309--316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, R. and Mørch, A. Mutual development: A case study in customer-initiated software product development. In V. Pipek, M. B. Rossen, B. deRuyter, and V. Wulf (Eds.), End-User Development, Springer, Heidelberg, 2009, 31--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Anderson, C. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More. Hyperion, New York, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Arias, E. G., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., and Scharff, E. Transcending the individual human mind---Creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Transactions on Computer Human-Interaction, 7, 1 (2000), 84--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ariely, D. The Upside of Irrationality -- the Unexpected Benefits of Defying Logic at Work and at Home. HarperCollins, New York, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Benkler, Y. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brown, J. S., Duguid, P., and Haviland, S. Toward informed participation: six scenarios in search of democracy in the Information Age. The Aspen Institute Quarterly 6, 4 (1994), 49--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Carmien, S. Socio-Technical Environments Supporting Distributed Cognition for Persons with Cognitive Disabilities. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder. http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~carmien/. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Carmien, S., Dawe, M., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., Kintsch, A., and Sullivan, J. F. Socio-technical environments supporting people with cognitive disabilities using public transportation. Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction (ToCHI) 12, 2 (2005), 233--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Carmien, S. P., and Fischer, G. Design, adoption, and assessment of a socio-technical environment supporting independence for persons with cognitive disabilities. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 597--607. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, HarperCollins Publishers, New York, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of Energy, Smart Grid. http://www.oe.energy.gov/smartgrid.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dick, H., Eden, H., and Fischer, G. Energy sustainability and Smart Grids: Fostering and supporting cultures of participation in the energy landscape of the future. (submitted for publication, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Eden, H. Getting in on the (inter)action: Exploring affordances for collaborative learning in a context of informed participation. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Proc. CSCL '2002 Conference, Boulder, Colorado (2002), 399--407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ehn, P. Manifesto for a digital bauhaus. Digital Creativity 9, 4 (1998), 207--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Engeström, Y. Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14, 1 (2001), 133--156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Fischer, G. Communities of interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems, In Proc. IRIS'24, Ulvik, Norway (2001), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer, G. Social creativity: Turning barriers into opportunities for collaborative design. In F. deCindio and D. Schuler (Eds.), Proc. PDC'04, CPSR, University of Toronto, Canada (July 2004), 152--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Fischer, G. End-user development and meta-design: Foundations for cultures of participation. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 22, 1 (2010), 52--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Fischer, G., Ehn, P., Engeström, Y., and Virkkunen, J. Symmetry of ignorance and informed participation. In Proc. PDC'02, Malmö University, Sweden (2002), 426--428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Fischer, G., and Giaccardi, E. Meta-design: A framework for the future of end user development. In H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, and V. Wulf (Eds.), End User Development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006, 427--457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K., Ostwald, J., Stahl, G., and Sumner, T. Embedding critics in design environments. In M. T. Maybury and W. Wahlster (Eds.), Readings in Intelligent User Interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1998, 537--559. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Giles, J. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438 (2005), 900--901.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Henderson, A., and Kyng, M. There's no place like home: Continuing design in use. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1991, 219--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Janis, I. Victims of Groupthink, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Leadbeater, C., and Miller, P. The Pro-Am Revolution -- How Enthusiasts Are Changing Our Economy and Society, 2008. http://www.demos.co.uk/files/proamrevolutionfinal.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mumford, E. A socio-technical approach to systems design. Requirements Engineering, 2000, 59--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Myers, B. A., Ko, A. J., and Burnett, M. M. Invited research overview: End-user programming. In Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'2006, Montreal (2006), 75--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. National Research Council. Beyond Productivity: Information Technology, Innovation, and Creativity, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Norman, D. A. Things That Make Us Smart Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. O'Reilly, T. What Is Web 2.0 -- Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Porter, J. Designing for the Social Web. New Riders, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Preece, J., and Shneiderman, B. (2009) The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (2008), 13--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Raymond, E. S., and Young, B. The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Rittel, H. Second-generation design methods. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984, 317--327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Schön, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Shirky, C. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organization. Penguin Books, New York, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Shneiderman, B. Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Communications of the ACM 50, 12 (2007), 20--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Simon, H. A. The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Snow, C. P. The Two Cultures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Star, S. L. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser and M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Volume II, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, USA, 1989, 37--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Suchman, L. A. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Surowiecki, J. The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor Books, New York, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Tapscott, D., and Williams, A. D. Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything, Portofolio, Penguin Group, New York, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. von Hippel, E. Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Wenger, E. Communities of Practice -- Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Winograd, T., and Flores, F. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, USA, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Zuboff, S. In the Age of the Smart Machine, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Extending boundaries with meta-design and cultures of participation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '10: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries
      October 2010
      889 pages
      ISBN:9781605589343
      DOI:10.1145/1868914

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader