skip to main content
10.1145/1868914.1868957acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Privacy-awareness information for web forums: results from an empirical study

Published: 16 October 2010 Publication History

Abstract

While interacting with others on the internet, users share a lot of personal data with a potentially large but "invisible" audience. An important issue is maintaining control over personal data and therefore, in the first place, users need to be aware to whom they are disclosing which data. Based on the cues-filtered-out theory we introduce a new feature to support the privacy-awareness of forum users and tested it with 313 users. The results of our empirical study show that the presentation of privacy-related context cues indeed increases forum users' privacy-awareness. This is an important precondition for users' willingness to modify privacy settings or to use privacy-enhancing technologies.

References

[1]
Acquisti, A., and Gross, R. Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the facebook. In Proceedings of 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (Cambridge, UK, 2006), pp. 36--58.
[2]
Acquisti, A., and Grossklags, J. Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security and Privacy 3, 1 (2005), 26--33.
[3]
Burger, J. Lügnerin! Betrügerin! http://www.zeit.de/2009/53/Internetmobbing?page=all, December 2009.
[4]
Cutler, R. H. Distributed presence and community in cyberspace. Interpersonal Computer and Technology 3, 2 (1995), 12--32.
[5]
danah boyd. Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning - Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume, D. Buckingham, Ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007.
[6]
Döring, N. Reduced social cues / cues filtered out. In Medienpsychologie. Schlüsselbegriffe und Konzepte (Stuttgart, 2008), N. C. Krämer, S. Schwan, D. Unz, and M. Suckfüll, Eds., Kohlhammer, pp. 290--297.
[7]
Ebersbach, A., Glaser, M., and Heigl, R. Social Web, vol. 3065 of UTB. UVK, Konstanz, 2008.
[8]
Eckersley, P. A primer on information theory and privacy. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/01/primer-information-theory-and-privacy, January 2010.
[9]
Gross, R., Acquisti, A., and Heinz, III, H. J. Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In WPES '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society (2005), pp. 71--80.
[10]
Joinson, A. N. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology 31 (2001), 177--192.
[11]
Koyani, S. J., Bailey, R. W., and Nall, J. R. Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. Computer Psychology, 2004.
[12]
Nielsen, J. Participation inequality. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html, October 2006.
[13]
Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., and Horne, D. A. The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs 41, 1 (2007), 100--126.
[14]
Pötzsch, S., and Borcea-Pfitzmann, K. Privacy-respecting access control in collaborative workspaces. In Privacy and Identity, IFIP AICT 320 (Nice, France, 2010), M. B. et al., Ed., Springer, pp. 102--111.
[15]
Simon, H. A. Empirically Grounded Economic Reason, vol. 3 of Models of Bounded Rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
[16]
Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J., and Berendt, B. E-privacy in 2nd generation e-commerce: privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In EC '01: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (New York, NY, USA, 2001), ACM, pp. 38--47.
[17]
Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communications. Management Science 32, 11 (1986), 1492--1512.
[18]
Strater, K., and Lipford, H. R. Strategies and struggles with privacy in an online social networking community. In BCS HCI (1) (2008), D. England, Ed., BCS, pp. 111--119.
[19]
Strater, K., and Richter, H. Examining privacy and disclosure in a social networking community. In SOUPS '07: Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Usable privacy and security (New York, NY, USA, 2007), ACM, pp. 157--158.
[20]
Stutzman, F., and Duffield, J. K. Friends only: examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in facebook. In CHI '10: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (New York, NY, USA, April 2010), ACM, pp. 1553--1562.
[21]
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974), 1124--1131.
[22]
Weisband, S., and Kiesler, S. Self disclosure on computer forms: meta-analysis and implications. In In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground. (New York, 1996), ACM, pp. 3--10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Addressing the privacy paradox on the organizational level: review and future directionsManagement Review Quarterly10.1007/s11301-021-00239-473:1(263-296)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2021
  • (2020)Does Context in Privacy Communication Really Matter? — A Survey on Consumer Concerns and PreferencesProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376575(1-11)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
  • (2019)Bringing Design to the Privacy TableProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300492(1-17)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Privacy-awareness information for web forums: results from an empirical study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NordiCHI '10: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries
    October 2010
    889 pages
    ISBN:9781605589343
    DOI:10.1145/1868914
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Reykjavik University
    • University of Iceland

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 October 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. empirical study
    2. forum
    3. privacy
    4. privacy awareness
    5. social software
    6. social web
    7. user-centered design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    NordiCHI '10
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Addressing the privacy paradox on the organizational level: review and future directionsManagement Review Quarterly10.1007/s11301-021-00239-473:1(263-296)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2021
    • (2020)Does Context in Privacy Communication Really Matter? — A Survey on Consumer Concerns and PreferencesProceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3313831.3376575(1-11)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2020
    • (2019)Bringing Design to the Privacy TableProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300492(1-17)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
    • (2017)The privacy paradox Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior A systematic literature reviewTelematics and Informatics10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.01334:7(1038-1058)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
    • (2014)Too much choiceProceedings of the Tenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3235838.3235845(69-87)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2014

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media