skip to main content
10.1145/1882362.1882403acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evidence-based software production

Published:07 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

"…[S]oftware remains NIT's [Networking and Information Technology] greatest weakness. Although reliable and robust software is central to activities throughout society, much software is brittle, full of bugs and flaws. Software development remains a labor-intensive process in which delays and cost overruns are common, and responding to installed software's errors, anomalies, vulnerabilities, and lack of interoperability is costly to organizations throughout the U.S. economy." "…[T]he science of software development must be a focus of Federal NIT R&D. As software's complexity continues to rise, today's design, development, and management problems will become intractable unless fundamental breakthroughs are made…"[2]

Current understanding of software development---largely based on anecdotes---is inadequate for this "science of software development." Achieving the deeper understanding needed to transform software production requires collecting and using evidence on a large scale. This paper proposes some steps toward that outcome.

References

  1. Jackson, D., Thomas, M. and Millett, L.I., Eds. 2007. Software for Dependable Systems: Sufficient Evidence? Committee on Certifiably Dependable Software Systems, National Research Council. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2007. Leadership Under Challenge: Information Technology R&D in a Competitive World,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Parnas, D. L. and Clements, P. C. 1986. A rational design process: how and why to fake it. IEEE Trans. on Software Eng. SE-12 (Feb. 1986), 251--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Risks to the Public.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Boehm, B. 1981. Software Engineering Economics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. COCOMO, http://sunset.usc.edu/csse/research/COCOMOII/cocomo_main.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hackbarth, R., Palframan, J., Mockus, A., Weiss, D. 2010. Assessing the state of software in a large enterprise, Empirical Software Eng 15, 3 (June. 2010), 219--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Grady, R., Caswell, D. 1987. Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-Wide Program. Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Boehm B. 1986. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. SIGSOFT SEN 11, 4 (Aug. 1986), 14--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gawande, A., 2009. How the Senate bill would contain the cost of health care. The New Yorker (Dec. 17, 2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Basili, V, Caldiera, G., McGarry, F., et al,, 1992. The Software Engineering Laboratory: an operational software experience factory. Proc of 14th ICSE, 370--381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Weiss, D. and Lai, C.R.T. 1999. Software Product Line Engineering. Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kitchenham, B., Dyba, T, Jørgensen, M. 2004. Evidence-based Software Engineering. Proc. of 26th ICSE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evidence-based software production

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        FoSER '10: Proceedings of the FSE/SDP workshop on Future of software engineering research
        November 2010
        460 pages
        ISBN:9781450304276
        DOI:10.1145/1882362

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 November 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Upcoming Conference

        FSE '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader