Auditory messages for speed advice in advanced driver assistance systems

ABSTRACT

Simple tones in in-car systems are mostly used for status indication or warning and alerting purposes. We argue that simple tones can also be used for the purpose of advising drivers through an Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS). Our ADAS application is called Cooperative Speed Assistance (CSA), where drivers receive advice to slow down or speed up to coordinate their speed with the speed of other vehicles in the traffic. Two concepts of auditory messages are presented: Looping messages are played as long as the advice applies, while Toggle messages mark the beginning and the end of an advice. For each concept, two prototypes of simple-tone signals were designed based on existing guidelines about sound characteristics affecting urgency and evaluation by users. The temporal characteristics of the signals indicated how much or how fast drivers should adapt their speed. The concepts were evaluated by having users drive in a driving simulator. Objective measurements indicated that there was no difference in effectiveness between the two concepts. Subjective evaluation indicated that users preferred the Toggle concept.

References

1. Adell, E., Varhelyi, A., and Hjalmdahl, M. Auditory and haptic systems for in-car speed management -- A comparative real life study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 11, 6 (2008), 445--458.
2. Belz, S. M., Robinson, G. S., and Casali, J. G. A new class of auditory warning signals for complex systems: Auditory icons. Human Factors 41, 4 (1999), 608.
3. Campbell, J. L., Richman, J. B., Carney, C., and Lee, J. D. In-Vehicle Display Icons and Other Information Elements Volume I: Guidelines. Seattle, 2004.
4. Edworthy, J., Loxley, S., and Dennis, I. Improving auditory warning design: Relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 33, 2 (1991), 205--231.
5. Edworthy, J., Hellier, E., and Hards, R. The semantic associations of acoustic parameters commonly used in the design of auditory information and warning signals. Ergonomics 38, 11 (1995), 2341.
6. Edworthy, J., Hellier, E., Walters, K., Weedon, B., and Adams, A. The Relationship between Task Performance, Reaction Time, and Perceived Urgency in Nonverbal Auditory Warnings. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 44, (2000), 674--677.
7. Edworthy, J. and Stanton, N. A user-centred approach to the design and evaluation of auditory warning signals: 1. Methodology. Ergonomics 38, 2 (1995), 2262--2280.
8. Gigi, E. GIPOS v 2.3. IPO TU/e, (2001).
9. Graham, R. Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. Ergonomics 42, 9 (1999), 1233--1248.
10. Greendino. Dutch Driving Simulator. http://www.rijsimulatie.nl/.
11. Hellier, E. J., Edworthy, J., and Dennis, I. A. N. Improving Auditory Warning Design: Quantifying and Predicting the Effects of Different Warning Parameters on Perceived Urgency. Human Factors 35, 4 (1993), 693--706.
12. Ho, C., Reed, N., and Spence, C. Multisensory in-car warning signals for collision avoidance. Human Factors 49, 6 (2007), 1107.
13. Horrey, W. J. and Wickens, C. D. Driving and Side Task Performance: The Effects of Display Clutter, Separation, and Modality. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46, 4 (2004), 611--624.
14. Marshall, D. C., Lee, J. D., and Austria, P. A. Alerts for in-vehicle information systems: Annoyance, urgency, and appropriateness. Human Factors 49, 1 (2007), 145.
15. Mohebbi, R., Gray, R., and Tan, H. Z. Driver Reaction Time to Tactile and Auditory Rear-End Collision Warnings While Talking on a Cell Phone. Human Factors 51, 1 (2009), 102--110.
16. Sarter, N. Multimodal information presentation: Design guidance and research challenges. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36, 5 (2006), 439--445.
17. Sodnik, J., Dicke, C., Tomazic, S., and Billinghurst, M. A user study of auditory versus visual interfaces for use while driving. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 5 (2008), 318--332.
18. Stanton, N. and Edworthy, J. Human Factors in Auditory Warnings. Ashgate, Aldershot, 1999.
19. Suied, C., Susini, P., and McAdams, S. Evaluating warning sound urgency with reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied 14, 3 (2008), 201--212.
20. Van Den Broek, T. H. A., Bart, N., Hoedemaeker, M., and Ploeg, J. The Experimental Setup of a Large Field Operational Test for Cooperative Driving Vehicles at the A270. 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, (2010).
21. Wiese, E. E. and Lee, J. D. Auditory alerts for in-vehicle information systems: the effects of temporal conflict and sound parameters on driver attitudes and performance. Ergonomics 47, 9 (2004), 965--86.
22. Zijlstra, F. and Doorn, L. van. The construction of a scale to measure subjective effort. Technical Report, Delft University of Technology (1985).

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction techniques

      • Auditory feedback