skip to main content
10.1145/1982185.1982387acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Adaptive hybridization strategies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

During the last decades, significant improvements have been achieved for solving complex combinatorial optimization problems issued from real world applications. To tackle large scale instances and intricate problem structures, sophisticated solving techniques have been developed, combined, and hybridized to provide efficient solvers. Combinatorial problems are often modeled as Constraint Satisfaction Problems or constraint optimization problems, which consist of a set of variables, a set of possible values for these variables and a set of constraints to be satisfied. However, solvers or hybridization of solvers become more and more complex: the user must select various solving and hybridization strategies and tune numerous parameters. Moreover, it is well-known that an a priori decision concerning strategies and parameters is very difficult since strategies and parameters effects are rather unpredictable and may change during solving.

References

  1. K. R. Apt. Principles of Constraint Programming. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Berkelaar. lpsolve---simplex-based code for linear and integer programming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Castro, E. Monfroy, C. Figueroa, and R. Meneses. An approach for dynamic split strategies in constraint solving. In Proc. of MICAI 2005, volume 3789 of LNAI, pages 162--174. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Hamadi, E. Monfroy, and F. Saubion, editors. Autonomous Search. Springer, 2010. To appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Hamadi, E. Monfroy, and F. Saubion. What is autonomous search? In The Ten years of CP-AI-OR. Springer, 2010. To appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Rodosek, M. Wallace, and M. Hajian. A new approach to integrating mixed integer programming and clp. Baltzer JOURNAL, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Schulte, G. Tack, and M. Lagerkvist. Gecode: Generic constraint development environment. INFORMS Annual Meeting, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '11: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 2011
    1868 pages
    ISBN:9781450301138
    DOI:10.1145/1982185

    Copyright © 2011 Authors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 March 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader