skip to main content
research-article

A Yield and Reliability Improvement Methodology Based on Logic Redundant Repair with a Repairable Scan Flip-Flop Designed by Push Rule

Published:01 April 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We propose a yield improvement methodology which repairs a faulty chip due to logic defect by using a repairable scan flip-flop (R-SFF). Our methodology improves area penalty, which is a large issue for logic repair technology in actual products, by using repair grouping and a redundant cell insertion algorithm and by pushing the design rule for the repairable area of R-SFF. Additionally, compared with the conventional method, we reduce the number of wire connections around redundant cells by improving the replacement method of the faulty cell by the redundant cell. The proposed methodology reduces the total area penalty caused by the logic redundant repair to 3.6% and improves the yield, that is the number of good chips on a wafer, by 4.7% when the defect density is 1.0[1/cm^2]. Furthermore, we propose the strategy to repair the in-field failures due to latent defect for the chip whose repair function had not been used in the shipment test.

References

  1. Aikawa, H., Morifuji, E., Sanuki, T., Sawada, T., Kyoh, S., Sakata, A., Ohta, M., Yoshimura, H., Nakayama, T., Iwai, M., and Matsuoka, F. 2008. Variability aware modeling and characterization in standard cell in 45 nm CMOS with stress enhancement technique. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, Digest of Technical Papers. 90--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsaiari, U. and Saleh, R. 2007. Power, delay and yield analysis of BIST/BISR PLAs using column redundancy. In Proceedings of the IEEE 8th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design. 703--710. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alsaiari, U. and Saleh, R. 2008. Partitioning for selective flip-flop redundancy in sequential circuits. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design. 798--803. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Beausang, J., Ellingham, C., and Robinson, M. 1996. Integrating scan into hierarchical synthesis methodologies. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference on Test and Design Validity. 751--756. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chang, C., Huang, S.-H., Ho, Y.-K., Lin, J.-Z., Wang, H.-P., and Lu, Y.-S. 2008. Type-matching clock tree for zero skew clock gating. In Proceedings of the ACM 45th Annual Design Automation Conference. 714--719. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dehon, A. and Naeimi, H. 2005. Seven strategies for tolerating highly defective fabrication. Design Test Comput. 22, 4, 306--315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gupta, P., Kahng, A. B., and Mantik, S. 2003. Routing-aware scan chain ordering. In Proceedings of the Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference. 857--862. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kim, I., Zorian, Y., Komoriya, G., Pham, H., Higgins, F. P., and Lewandowski, J. L. 1998. Built in self repair for embedded high density SRAM. In Proceedings of the International Test Conference. 1112--1119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Konoura, H., Mitsuyama, Y., Hashimoto, M., and Onoye, T. 2010. Comparative study on delay degrading estimation due to NBTI with circuit/instance/transistor-level stress probability consideration. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design. 646--651.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kothe, R., Vierhaus, H. T., Coym, T., Vermeiren, W., and Straube, B. 2006. Embedded self repair by transistor and gate level reconfiguration. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits and Systems. 208--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nakura, T., Nose, K., and Mizuno, M. 2007. Fine-grain redundant logic using detect-prediction flip-flops. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Solid-State Circuits, Digest of Technical Papers. 402--403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ohba, A., Ohbayashi, S., Shiomi, T., Takano, S., Anami, K., Honda, H., Ishigaki, Y., Hatanaka, M., Nagao, S., and Kayano, S. 1990. A 7NS 1MB BiCMOS ECL SRAM with program-free redundancy. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, Digest of Technical Papers. 41--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Subhasish, M., Huang, W.-J., Saxena, N. R., Yu, S.-Y., and McCluskey, E. J. 2004. Reconfigurable architecture for autonomous self-repair. Design Test Comput. 21, 3, 228--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Venkataraman, S. and Drummonds, S. B. 2000. POIROT: A logic fault diagnosis tool and its applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference. 253--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Zhou, C., Ross, R., Vickery, C., Metteer, B., Gross, S., and Verret, D. 2002. Yield prediction using critical area analysis with inline defect data. In Proceedings of the IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference. 82--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Yield and Reliability Improvement Methodology Based on Logic Redundant Repair with a Repairable Scan Flip-Flop Designed by Push Rule

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
        ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems  Volume 17, Issue 2
        April 2012
        170 pages
        ISSN:1084-4309
        EISSN:1557-7309
        DOI:10.1145/2159542
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 April 2012
        • Accepted: 1 November 2011
        • Revised: 1 August 2011
        • Received: 1 October 2010
        Published in todaes Volume 17, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader