Abstract
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) performs over 800,000 disability exams and distributes over $37 billion in disability benefits per year. VA developed and deployed a computer-based disability exam documentation system in order to improve exam report quality and timeliness. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing joint disability examinations supported by computerized templates to the examinations documented via dictation, to determine if the system met the intended goals or had unintended consequences. Consenting veterans were randomized to undergo exams documented using computerized templates or via dictation. We compared exam report quality, documentation time costs, encounter length, total time to fulfill an exam request with a finalized exam report, and veteran satisfaction. Computer-based templates resulted in disability exam reports that had higher quality scores (p. 0.042) and were returned to the requesting office faster than exam reports created via dictation (p. 0.02).
Documentation time and veteran satisfaction were similar for both the documentation techniques. Encounter length was significantly longer for the template group. Computer-based templates impacted the VA disability evaluation system by improving report quality scores and production time and lengthening encounter times. Oversight bodies have called for mandated use of computer-based templates nationwide. We believe mandates regarding use of health information technology should be guided by data regarding its positive and negative impacts.
- Ahlers, P., Sullivan, R. J., Hammond, W. E., Walter, E. L., and Tolley, H. D. 1976. The cost of auditing outpatient records. South Med. J. 69, 1328--1330.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Apkon, M. and Singhaviranon, P. 2001. Impact of an electronic information system on physician workflow and data collection in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 27, 122--130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aronsky, D. and Haug, P. J. 2000. Assessing the quality of clinical data in a computer-based record for calculating the pneumonia severity index. J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. 7, 55--65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ash, J. S., Berg, M., and Coiera, E. 2003. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care informations system related errors. J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. Preprint.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barnett, G. O., Winickoff, R., Dorsey, J. L., Morgan, M. M., and Lurie, R. S. 1978. Quality assurance through automated monitoring and concurrent feedback using a computer-based medical information system. Med. Care 16, 962--970.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barnett, G. O., Winickoff, R. N., Morgan, M. M., and Zielstorff, R. D. 1983. A computer-based monitoring system for follow-up of elevated blood pressure. Med Care 21, 400--409.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bell, D. S. and Greenes, R. A. 1994. Evaluation of UltraSTAR: performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications Medical Care. 216--222.Google Scholar
- Blake, R. and Mangiameli, P. 2009. The effects and interactions of data quality and problem complexity on data mining. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ), 160--165.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. H., Hardenbrook, S., Herrick, L., St. Onge, J., Bailey, K., and Elkin, P. L. 2001. Usability evaluation of the progress note construction set. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. 76--80.Google Scholar
- Brown, S. H., Lincoln, M. J., Groen, P. J., and Kolodner, R. M. 2003. VistA--U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs national-scale HIS. Int. J. Med. Inf. 69, 135--156.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brown, S. H., Speroff, T., Fielstein, E. M., Bauer, B. A., Wahner-Roedler, D. L., Greevy, R., and Elkin, P. L. 2006. eQuality: Electronic quality assessment from narrative clinical reports. Mayo Clin. Proc. 81, 1472--1481.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cimino, J. J., Johnson, S. B., Aguirre, A., Roderer, N., and Clayton, P. D. 1992. The MEDLINE button. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Applications Medical Care. 81--85.Google Scholar
- Cimino, J. J., Patel, V. L., and Kushniruk, A. W. 2001. Studying the human-computer-terminology interface. J Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8, 163--173.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dawdy, M. R., Munter, D. W., and Gilmore, R. A. 1997. Correlation of patient entry rates and physician documentation errors in dictated and handwritten emergency treatment records. Amer. J. Emerg. Med. 15, 115--117.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dollery, C. T., Beilin, L. J., Bulpitt, C. J., Coles, E. C., Johnson, B. F., Munro-Faure, A. D., and Turner, S. C. 1977. Initial care of hypertensive patients. Influence of different types of clinical records. British Heart J. 39, 181--185.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Duggan, A. K., Starfield, B., and Deangelis, C. 1990. Structured encounter form: The impact on provider performance and recording of well-child care. Pediatrics 85, 104--113.Google Scholar
- Essin, D. J., Dishakjian, R., Deciutiis, V. L., Essin, C. D., and Steen, S. N. 1998. Development and assessment of a computer-based preanesthetic patient evaluation system for obstetrical anesthesia. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 14, 95--100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Evans, R. S., Pestotnik, S. L., Classen, D. C., Clemmer, T. P., Weaver, L. K., Orme, J. F., Jr., Lloyd, J. F., and Burke, J. P. 1998. A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. New. Eng. J. Med. 338, 232--238.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fatzinger, P., Kammer, A., and Garrett, M. 1992. Development and use of preprinted forms and adhesive labels in medical record charting. J. Amer. Diet Assoc. 92, 982--985.Google Scholar
- Fielstein, E. M., Brown, S. H., McBrine, C. S., Clark, T. K., Hardenbrook, S. P., and Speroff, T. 2006. The effect of standardized computer-guided templates on quality of VA disability exams. In Proceedings of the American Medical Information Association Fall Symposium. 249--253.Google Scholar
- Geissbuhler, A. and Miller, R. A. 1996. A new approach to the implementation of direct care-provider order entry. In Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. 689--693.Google Scholar
- Gouveia-Oliveira, A., Raposo, V. D., Salgado, N. C., Almeida, I., Nobre-Leitao, C., and De Melo, F. G. 1991. Longitudinal comparative study on the influence of computers on reporting of clinical data. Endoscopy 23, 334--337.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gray, J. E., Safran, C., Davis, R. B., Pompilio-Weitzner, G., Stewart, J. E., Zaccagnini, L., and Pursley, D. 2000. Baby CareLink: Using the internet and telemedicine to improve care for high-risk infants. Pediatrics 106, 1318--1324.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hammond, K. W. and Munnecke, T. H. 1984. A computerized psychiatric treatment planning system. Hosp. Comm. Psych. 35, 160--163.Google Scholar
- Hershberg, P. I., Goldfinger, S. E., Lemon, F. R., and Fessel, W. J. 1972. Medical record as index of quality of care. New. Eng. J. Med,. 286, 725--726.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hiddema-Van De Wal, A., Smith, R. J., Van Der Werf, G. T., and Meyboom-De Jong, B. 2001. Towards improvement of the accuracy and completeness of medication registration with the use of an electronic medical record (EMR). Fam. Pract. 18, 288--291.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Humphreys, T., Shofer, F. S., Jacobson, S., Coutifaris, C., and Stemhagen, A. 1992. Preformatted charts improve documentation in the emergency department. Ann. Emerg. Med. 21, 534--540.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeans, W. D., Danton, R. M., and Kilburn, A. R. 1980. An assessment of a computerized reporting system (SIREP). British J. Radiol. 53, 421--427.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson, K. B. and Cowan, J. 2002. Clictate: A computer-based documentation tool for guideline-based care. J. Med. Syst. 26, 47--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson, K. B., Ravich, W. J., and Cowan, J. A., Jr. 2004. Brainstorming about next-generation computer-based documentation: an AMIA clinical working group survey. Int. J. Med. Inf. 73, 665--674.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson, K. B., Serwint, J. R., Fagan, L. M., Thompson, R. E., and Wilson, M. H. 2005. Computer-based documentation: effect on parent and physician satisfaction during a pediatric health maintenance encounter. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 159, 250--254.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kahn, C. E., Jr. and Huynh, P. N. 1996. Knowledge representation for platform-independent structured reporting. In Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. 478--482.Google Scholar
- Kiefer, V. F., Schwartz, R. J., and Jacobs, L. M. 1993. The effect of quality assurance on flight nurse documentation. Air Med. J. 1, 11--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kuhn, K., Gaus, W., Wechsler, J. G., Janowitz, P., Tudyka, J., Kratzer, W., Swobodnik, W., and Ditschuneit, H. 1992. Structured reporting of medical findings: Evaluation of a system in gastroenterology. Methods Inf. Med. 31, 268--274.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kuhn, K., Swobodnik, W., Johannes, R. S., Zemmler, T., Stange, E. F., Ditschuneit, H., and Classen, M. 1991. The quality of gastroenterological reports based on free text dictation: an evaluation in endoscopy and ultrasonography. Endoscopy 23, 262--264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ledley, R. S. 1966. Computer aids to medical diagnosis. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 196, 933--943.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lum, F., Schein, O., Schachat, A. P., Abbott, R. L., Hoskins, H. D., Jr., and Steinberg, E. P. 2000. Initial two years of experience with the AAO National Eyecare Outcomes Network (NEON) cataract surgery database. Ophthalmology 107, 691--697.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Madlon-Kay, D. J. 1998. Use of a structured encounter form to improve well-child care documentation. Arch. Fam. Med. 7, 480--483.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marill, K. A., Gauharou, E. S., Nelson, B. K., Peterson, M. A., Curtis, R. L., and Gonzalez, M. R. 1999. Prospective, randomized trial of template-assisted versus undirected written recording of physician records in the emergency department. Ann. Emerg. Med. 33, 500--509.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marshall, M., Campbell, C., Hacker, J., and Rowland, M. 2002. Quality Indicators for General Practice: A Practical Guide for Health Professionalsa and Managers. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
- McDonald, C. J. 1976. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man. New. Eng. J. Med. 295, 1351--1355.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDonald, C. J. 1997. The barriers to electronic medical record systems and how to overcome them. J. Amer. Med. Inf. Assoc 4, 213--221.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDonald, C. J., Overhage, J. M., Dexter, P., Takesue, B. Y., and Dwyer, D. M. 1997. A framework for capturing clinical data sets from computerized sources. Ann. Intern. Med. 127, 675--682.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDonald, C. J., Overhage, J. M., Tierney, W. M., Dexter, P. R., Martin, D. K., Suico, J. G., Zafar, A., Schadow, G., Blevins, L., Glazener, T., Meeks-Johnson, J., Lemmon, L., Warvel, J., Porterfield, B., Warvel, J., Cassidy, P., Lindbergh, D., Belsito, A., Tucker, M., Williams, B., and Wodniak, C. 1999. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: A quarter century experience. Int. J. Med. Inf. 54, 225--253.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDonald, C. J., Tierney, W. M., Overhage, J. M., Martin, D. K., and Wilson, G. A. 1992. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers. MD Comput. 9, 206--217.Google Scholar
- McDonald, C. J., Wilson, G. A., and McCabe, G. P., Jr. 1980. Physician response to computer reminders. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 244, 1579--1581.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McGeary, M., Ford, M. A., McCutchen, M. R., and Barnes, D. K. 2007. A 21st century system for evaluating veterans for the disability benefits. IOM Board on Military and Veterans Health: Committee on Medical Evaluation of Veterans for Disability Compensation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- McKnight, L. K., Elkin, P. L., Ogren, P. V., and Chute, C. G. 1999. Barriers to the clinical implementation of compositionality. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. 320--324.Google Scholar
- Mehmood, K., Cherfi, S., and Comyn-Wattiau, I. 2009. Data quality through conceptual model quality -- reconciling researchers and practitioners through a customizable quality model. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ'09). 61--74.Google Scholar
- Modai, I. and Rabinowitz, J. 1993. Why and how to establish a computerized system for psychiatric case records. Hosp. Commun. Psych. 44, 1091--1095.Google Scholar
- Nightingale, F. 1863. Notes on Hospitals. Longman, London.Google Scholar
- O'Connor, A. E., Finnel, L., and Reid, J. 2001. Do preformatted charts improve doctors' documentation in a rural hospital emergency department? A prospective trial. NZ Med. J. 114, 443--444.Google Scholar
- Orman, L., Storey, V. C., and Wang, R. Y. 1996. Systems approaches to improving data quality. In Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality. 117--126.Google Scholar
- Ornstein, S. M., Jenkins, R. G., Lee, F. W., Sack, J. L., Lakier, E. I., Roskin, S. D., Wulfman, J. S., and Wriston, G. A. 1997. The computer-based patient record as a CQI tool in a family medicine center. Joint Comm. J. Qual. Improv. 23, 347--361.Google Scholar
- Orr, K. 1998. Data quality and systems theory. Comm. ACM 41, 66--71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pierik, F. H., Van Ginneken, A. M., Dohle, G. R., Vreeburg, J. T., and Weber, R. F. 2000. The advantages of standardized evaluation of male infertility. Int. J. Androl. 23, 340--346.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Poon, A. D., Fagan, L. M., and Shortliffe, E. H. 1996. The PEN-Ivory project: Exploring user-interface design for the selection of items from large controlled vocabularies of medicine. J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. 3, 168--183.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Powsner, S. M., Riely, C. A., Barwick, K. W., Morrow, J. S., and Miller, P. L. 1989. Automated bibliographic retrieval based on current topics in hepatology: hepatopix. Comput. Biomed. Res. 22, 552--564. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rabinowitz, J., Modai, I., Valevski, A., Zemishlany, Z., and Mark, M. 1993. Benefits of a structured format for paper and computerized psychiatric case records. Hosp. Commun. Psych. 44, 1095--1097.Google Scholar
- VA Office of the Inspector General. Review of state variances in VA disability compensation payments.Google Scholar
- Rosenbloom, S. T., Crow, A. N., Blackford, J. U., and Johnson, K. B. 2006. Cognitive factors influencing perceptions of clinical documentation tools. J. Biomed. Inf. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosenbloom, S. T., Kiepek, W., Belletti, J., Adams, P., Shuxteau, K., Johnson, K. B., Elkin, P. L., and Shultz, E. K. 2004. Generating complex clinical documents using structured entry and reporting. MEDINFO'04, 683--687.Google Scholar
- Rosenbloom, S. T., Miller, R. A., Johnson, K. B., Elkin, P. L., and Brown, S. H. 2006. Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13, 277--288.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Safran, D. G., Kosinski, M., Tarlov, A. R., Rogers, W. H., Taira, D. H., Lieberman, N., and Ware, J. E. 1998. The Primary Care Assessment Survey: Tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med. Care 36, 728--739.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sahlstedt, S., Adolfsson, H., Ehnfors, M., and Kallstrom, B. 1997. Nursing process documentation--Effects on workload and quality when using a computer program and a key word model for nursing documentation. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 46, 330--336.Google Scholar
- Schriger, D. L., Baraff, L. J., Rogers, W. H., and Cretin, S. 1997. Implementation of clinical guidelines using a computer charting system. Effect on the initial care of health care workers exposed to body fluids. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 278, 1585--1590.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schwartz, R. J., Boisoneau, D.. and Jacobs, L. M. 1995. The quantity of cause-of-injury information documented on the medical record: an appeal for injury prevention. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2, 98--103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott, J. T. 2007. Honoring the call to duty: Veterans' disability benefits in the 21st century. Disability Commission, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Seltzer, S. E., Kelly, P., Adams, D. F., Chiango, B. F., Viera, M. A., Fener, E., Hooton, S., Bannon-Rohrbach, S., Healy, C. D., Doubilet, P. M., and Holman, B. L. 1997. Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports in a teaching hospital setting. AJR Amer. J. Roentgenol 168, 889--893.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Solomon, D. H., Schaffer, J. L., Katz, J. N., Horsky, J., Burdick, E., Nadler, E., and Bates, D. W. 2000. Can history and physical examination be used as markers of quality? An analysis of the initial visit note in musculoskeletal care. Med. Care 38, 383--391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stead, W. W., Hammond, W. E., and Estes, E. H. 1977. Evaluation of an audio mode of the automated medical history. Methods Inf. Med. 16, 20--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stead, W. W., Heyman, A., Thompson, H. K., and Hammond, W. E. 1972. Computer-assisted interview of patients with functional headache. Arch. Intern. Med. 129, 950--955.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stetson, P. D., Morrison, F. P., Bakken, S., and Johnson, S. B. 2008. Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument. J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15, 534--541.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Teo, S., Hanson, R., Van Asperen, P., Giles, H., Fasher, B., Davis, A. M., and Kristidis, P. 1995. Improving asthma documentation in a paediatric emergency department. J. Paediatr. Child Health 31, 130--133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tierney, W. M., Miller, M. E., Overhage, J. M., and McDonald, C. J. 1993. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 269, 379--383.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Veterans' Disability Benefits. 2005. VA could enhance its progress in complying with court decision on disability criteria. United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Walters, B. C. and McNeill, I. 1990. Improving the record of patient assessment in the trauma room. J. Trauma 30, 398--409.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weeks, W. B., Mills, P. D., Waldron, J., Brown, S. H., Speroff, T., and Coulson, L. R. 2003. A model for improving the quality and timeliness of compensation and pension examinations in VA facilities. J. Healthcare Manage. 48, 252--261; discussion, 262.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weinger, M. B., Herndon, O. W., and Gaba, D. M. 1997. The effect of electronic record keeping and transesophageal echocardiography on task distribution, workload, and vigilance during cardiac anesthesia. Anesthesiology 87, 144--155; 129A--130A.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Winickoff, R. N., Coltin, K. L., Fleishman, S. J., and Barnett, G. O. 1986. Semiautomated reminder system for improving syphilis management. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 1, 78--84.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wirtschafter, D. D., Scalise, M., Henke, C., and Gams, R. A. 1981. Do information systems improve the quality of clinical research? Results of a randomized trial in a cooperative multi-institutional cancer group. Comput. Biomed. Res. 14, 78--90.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wrenn, K., Rodewald, L., Lumb, E., and Slovis, C. 1993. The use of structured, complaint-specific patient encounter forms in the emergency department. Ann. Emerg. Med. 22, 805--812.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zenni, E. A. and Robinson, T. N. 1996. Effects of structured encounter forms on pediatric house staff knowledge, parent satisfaction, and quality of care. A randomized, controlled trial. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 150, 975--980.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Documentation quality and time costs: A randomized controlled trial of structured entry versus dictation
Recommendations
Effects of a Computer-based Nursing Documentation System on the Quality of Nursing Documentation
Nursing documentation is an important part of clinical documentation. However, documentation of the nursing process is frequently lacking quality. There are high expectations that computer support in nursing documentation will help improve documentation ...
Using GIS to Profile Health-Care Costs of VA Quality-Enhancement Research Initiative Diseases
The Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Service at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System launched a Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) in 1998. This study estimated health-care costs of nine diseases under ...
Comments