skip to main content
10.1145/2426636.2426641acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Educating for mobile computing: addressing the new challenges

Published:03 July 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computers that once filled rooms now fit in our pockets, and unlike their predecessors, mobile computers abound. The mobile industry is surging, with more smartphones being sold to consumers than PCs [17]. But does the rise of mobility impact computer science education? We claim that computer science educators must seriously consider mobility as they examine their curriculum. In this working group report, we offer a brief defense of why mobile computing belongs in our courses, summarize our survey of several hundred courses which already incorporate it, and discuss how educators might adopt it in their own courses. We hope that this work will help computer science educators make informed decisions about incorporating mobile computing into their courses and provide examples of such integration on different levels, ranging from individual projects or lecture topics to mobile computing as a learning context for an entire course.

References

  1. Alabama Summer Computer Camps. http://outreach.cs.ua.edu/camps. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Google play store. http://play.google.com. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. The HTML5 test. http://html5test.com. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. MIT App Inventor. http://www.appinventor.mit.edu. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mobile HTML 5. http://mobilehtml5.org. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Scratch. http://www.scratch.og. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Apple, Inc. iOS human interface guidelines. http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#DOCUMENTATION/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/Introduction/Introduction.html. {Online; accessed 21-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Apple, Inc. iOS security. http://images.apple.com/ipad/business/docs/iOS_Security_May12.pdf. {Online; accessed 31-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lucian Armasu. Android less secure? ha! iOS 5 seems to be full of security flaws. http://www.androidauthority.com/android-lesssecure-ha-ios-5-seems-to-be-full-of-securityflaws-31326. {Online; accessed 31-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. The Entertainment Software Association. Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2008.pdf. {Online; accessed 21-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Theresa Beaubouef and John Mason. Why the high attrition rate for computer science students: some thoughts and observations. SIGCSE Bull., 37(2):103--106, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jens Bennedsen and Michael E. Caspersen. Failure rates in introductory programming. SIGCSE Bull., 39(2):32--36, June 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Maureen Biggers, Anne Brauer, and Tuba Yilmaz. Student perceptions of computer science: a retention study comparing graduating seniors with cs leavers. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '08, pages 402--406, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Barry Burd, Jo¿ao Paulo Barros, Chris Johnson, Stan Kurkovsky, Arnold Rosenbloom, and Nikolai Tillman. Mobile course survey. http://www.edu4mobile.org. {Online; accessed 21-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bary Burd, John Goulden, Brian Ladd, Michael Rogers, and Kris Stewart. Computer games in the classroom, or, how to get perfect attendance, even at 8 am. SIGCSE Bull., 39(1):496--496, March 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bill Buxton. Multi-touch systems that i have known and loved. http://www.billbuxton.com/multitouchOverview.html. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Canalys. Smart phones overtake client PCs in 2011. http://www.canalys.com/newsroom/smart-phonesovertake-client-pcs-2011, 2012. {Online; accessed 21-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ching-Chiu Chao. An investigation of learning style differences and attitudes toward digital game-based learning among mobile users. In Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Workshop on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, WMTE '06, pages 29--31, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Boston University Metropolitan College. MET CS683: Mobile application development. http://www.bu.edu/csmet/cs683/. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. The Nielsen Company. America's new mobile majority: a look at smartphone owners in the u.s. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=31688,May 2012. {Online; accessed 21-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. International Business Machines Corp. Ibm study finds consumers prefer a mobile device over the pc. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/25737.wss. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Microsoft Corp. Dreamspark. http://www.dreamspark.com. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Microsoft Corp. Touchdevelop. http://www.touchdevelop.com. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Delvin Defoe, Stan Kurkovsky, and Emily Graetz. Mobile game development projects for introductory cs courses: tutorial presentation. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 26(4):93--94, April 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. ACM Interim Review Task Force. Computer science curriculum 2008: An interim revision of cs 2001. http://www.acm.org/education/curricula. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Andrea Forte and Mark Guzdial. Computers for communication, not calculation: Media as a motivation and context for learning. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 4 - Volume 4, HICSS '04, pages 40096.1--, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Google Inc. Android UI design patterns. http://www.google.com/events/io/2010/sessions/android-ui-design-patterns.html. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mark Green and Michele Perras. Mobile computing research and education: bridging the gap between academia and industry. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, CASCON '10, pages 407--408, Riverton, NJ, USA, 2010. IBM Corp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Mark Guzdial. Education: Teaching computing to everyone. Commun. ACM, 52(5):31--33, May 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Google Inc. and Open Handset Alliance. Android design. http://developer.android.com/design/index.html. {Online; accessed 21-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Google Inc. and Open Handset Alliance. Android security overview. http://source.android.com/tech/security/index.html. {Online; accessed 31-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Eric Klopfer. Augmented Learning: Research and Design of Mobile Educational Games. The MIT Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Elina M. I. Koivisto. Mobile games 2010. In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Game research and development, CyberGames '06, pages 1--2, Murdoch University, Australia, Australia, 2006. Murdoch University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Stan Kurkovsky. Making the case for mobile game development. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, ITiCSE '09, pages 401--401, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Gretchen Livingston. Latinos and digital technology, 2010. Pew Hispanic Center, February 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Qusay H. Mahmoud and Allan Dyer. Integrating blackberry wireless devices into computer programming and literacy courses. In Proceedings of the 45th annual southeast regional conference, ACM-SE 45, pages 495--500, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Qusay H. Mahmoud and Allan Dyer. Mobile devices in an introductory programming course. Computer, 41(6):108--107, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Michael Mandel. The app economy. TechNet, February 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. David Metcalf, Marcelo Milrad, Dennis Cheek, Sara Raasch, and Angela Hamilton. My sports pulse: Increasing student interest in stem disciplines through sports themes, games and mobile technologies. In Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education, WMUTE '08, pages 23--30, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. OpenSignalMaps. Android fragmentation visualized. http://opensignalmaps.com/reports/fragmentation.php. {Online; accessed 21-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ltd. Research in Motion. Blackberry academic program. http://us.blackberry.com/company/blackberryacademic-program.html. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Krishnendu Roy. App inventor for android: report from a summer camp. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '12, pages 283--288, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Aaron Smith. Americans and their gadgets. Pew Internet and American Life Project, October 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Telenav. Survey finds one-third of americans more willing to give up sex than their mobile phones. http://www.telenav.com/about/pr-summertravel/report-20110803.html, August 2011. {Online; accessed 21-July-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. DePaul University. GAM386: Game development for mobile devices. http://www.cdm.depaul.edu/academics/pages/courseinfo.aspx?crseid=008285. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. New York University. V22.0480: iphone programming. http://www.cs.nyu.edu/courses/spring09/V22.0480-004/. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Washington University. CSE574S: Advanced topics in computer networking. http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse574-06/j_1int.htm. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Berkeley University of California. CS160: User interface design. http://bid.berkeley.edu/cs160-fall10/index.php. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Berkeley University of California. CS294-7: Special topics: Wireless communications and mobile computing. http://bnrg.eecs.berkeley.edu/~randy/Courses/CS294.S96/CS294-7.S96.html. {Online; accessed 1-August-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2008. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, 127 edition, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Jules White, Jeff Gray, and Adam Porter. Smartphones in the curriculum workshop (smack 2011). In Proceedings of the 2011 24th IEEE-CS Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEET '11, pages 520--522, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. David Wolber. App inventor capabilities and limitations. http://www.appinventor.org/capabilities-limitations. {Online; accessed 9-October-2012}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Educating for mobile computing: addressing the new challenges

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      Stewart Mark Godwin

      Computers are used across all subject areas in education. However, in recent times, there has been a trend toward using mobile technologies as a replacement for traditional computer laboratories. The adoption of mobile technologies by the general community is transforming the way individuals and businesses communicate, which in turn influences the education sector. This paper surveyed 200 courses that used some aspect of mobile computing. These courses used various methods to engage students in the content and assessment tasks. The authors identify difficulties faced by educators and course developers and suggest solutions in a comprehensive discussion on platform-dependent issues. This is followed by a selection of exemplary assignment ideas that highlight the flexibility and versatility of the mobile platform. The challenges addressed by the subjects in this paper indicate that educators are delivering courses in new ways that break from traditional methods. In conclusion, the authors highlight the need to develop and revise curricula for mobile technologies, but they also caution that innovation in mobile technologies has not peaked, which will ensure future challenges. Educators interested in integrating mobile technologies into their courses would benefit from reading this paper. Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ITiCSE-WGR '12: Proceedings of the final reports on Innovation and technology in computer science education 2012 working groups
        July 2012
        70 pages
        ISBN:9781450318723
        DOI:10.1145/2426636
        • Program Chairs:
        • Liz Adams,
        • Noa Ragonis

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 July 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

        Upcoming Conference

        ITiCSE 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader