ABSTRACT
In this paper we explore how and why communication problems such as lack of understanding, low involvement, and negative emotions emerged during the computer-mediated conversations of same-culture and cross-culture pairs. We used retrospective analysis, in which pairs of cross-culture and same-culture American and Chinese participants collaborated on a crime-solving task via Instant Messaging (IM), and later reviewed their IM conversations to report their thoughts and feelings on a minute-by-minute basis. We found differences in the types of messages people produced based on the cultural combination of the pairs. We also found that the content of their partner's messages influenced participants' involvement and negative emotions during the conversation. Our results provide insights into the conversational processes of computer-mediated intercultural teams, and have implications for the design of intercultural collaboration tools.
- Bales, R. F. (1950). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15, 257--263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Black, S., Levin, J., Mehan, H. & Quinn, C. (1983). "Real and Non-real Time Interaction: Unraveling Multiple Threads of Discourse". Discourse Processes, 6, 59--75.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cegala, D. J., Savage, G. T., Brunner, C. C., & Conrad, A. (1982). An elaboration of the meaning of interaction involvement: Toward the development of a theoretical concept. Communication Monograghs, 49, 229--248.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, L. (1995). Interaction involvement and patterns of topical talk: A comparison of intercultural and intracultural dyads. International journal of Intercultural Relations, 19, 463--482.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346--371. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cramton, C. D. & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 231--263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlations Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Coker, D. & Burgoon, J. (1987). The nature of conversational involvement and non-verbal encoding patterns. Human Communication Research, 13, 463--494.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gallois, C., Franklyn-Stokes, A., Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1988). Communication accommodation in intercultural encounters. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in Intercultural Communication, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Gill, A. J., French, R. M., Gergle, D., & Oberlander, J. (2008). The Language of Emotion in Short Blog Texts. Proceedings of CSCW 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Rituals: Essays in Face to Face Behavior. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Gottman, J. M. & Levenson, R. W. (1985). A valid procedure for obtaining self-report of affect in marital interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 151--160.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Comm. Research, 22, 510.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, N.Y: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
- Hancock, J. T., Gee, K., Ciaccio, K. & Mae-Hwah Lin, J. M.-H. (2008). I'm sad you're sad: emotional contagion in CMC. Proc. CSCW '08. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4, 4.Google Scholar
- Hinds, P. & Kiesler, S. (2002). Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hung, Y. T. & Nguyen, D. (2008). The impact of cultural diversity on global virtual team collaboration - A social identity perspective. Proc. of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kayworth, T., & Leidner, D. (2000). The global virtual manager: A prescription for success. European Management Journal, 18, 183.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. (2001). Emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99--130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123--1134.Google Scholar
- Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: an experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 77--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kraut, R., Lewis, S., Swezey, L. W. (1982). Listener responsiveness and the coordination of conversation. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 718--731.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leshed, G., Hancock, J., Cosley, D., McLeod, P. & Gay, C. (2007). Feedback for guiding reflection on teamwork practices. Proc. GROUP 2007. 217--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, H. Z. (1999a). Grounding and information communication in intercultural and intracultural dyadic discourse. Discourse Processes, 28, 195.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, H. Z. (1999b). Communicating information in conversations: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 387.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li, H. Z. (2006). Backchannel responses as misleading feedback in intercultural discourse. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35, 2, 99--116.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lipnack, J. & Stamp, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology. NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Littell, R., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, D. & Fussell, S. (2012). How did you feel during our conversations: Retrospective analysis of intercultural and same-culture instant messaging conversations. Proc. CSCW 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olson, G. M. & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15, 139--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Otondo, R. F., Van Scotter, J. R., Allen, D. G., & Palvia, P. (2008). The Complexity of Richness: Media, Message, and Communication Outcomes. Information & Management, 40, 21--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Rice, R. & Love, G. (1987). Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14, 1, 85--108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of "uh huh'' and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71--93).Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Setlock, L. D. & Fussell, S. R. (2010). What's it worth to you? The costs and affordances of CMC tools to Asian and American users. Proc. CSCW 2010, 341--350. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Setlock, L. D., Quinones, P. & Fussell, S. R. (2007). Does culture interact with media richness? The effects of audio vs. video conferencing on Chinese and American dyads. Proc. HICSS 2007, 13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Setlock, L. D., Fussell, S. R. & Neuwirth, C. (2004). Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging. Proc. CSCW 2004, 604--613. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
- Villaume, W. A. & Cegala, D. J. (1988). Interaction involvement and discourse strategies: The patterned use of cohesive devices in conversation. Communication Monographs, 55, 20--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walther, J. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6, 186--203.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, H., Fussell, S. F. & Setlock, L. D. (2009). Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming. Proc. CHI 2009, 669--678. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuan, Y., Bazarova, N., Zhang, Z. X., & Fulk, J. (2012). Recognition of Expertise and Perceived Influence in Intercultural Group Collaboration: A Study of Mixed American and Chinese Intercultural Groups. Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Effect of message content on communication processes in intercultural and same-culture instant messaging conversations
Recommendations
How did you feel during our conversation?: retrospective analysis of intercultural and same-culture instant messaging conversations
CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative WorkResearch has shown that intercultural communication can be more problematic than same-culture communication. In this study we use a technique called retrospective analysis in order to examine these problems in greater detail. American and Chinese ...
Verbal cues of involvement in dyadic same-culture and cross-culture instant messaging conversations
CABS '14: Proceedings of the 5th ACM international conference on Collaboration across boundaries: culture, distance & technologyThis paper explores how people in same-culture and cross- culture pairs use verbal cues to express involvement in dyadic text-based Instant Messaging (IM) conversations. We report an experimental study with same-culture and cross-culture pairs of ...
Retrospective analysis of cross-culture communication
ICIC '10: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Intercultural collaborationWe report a study using retrospective analysis to understand American and Chinese participants' feelings and reactions on a moment-by-moment basis during an interaction. Participants talked about a fictional crime story together and then individually ...
Comments