skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468611acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

WalkMinder: encouraging an active lifestyle using mobile phone interruptions

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Medical research suggests that avoiding lengthy periods of physical inactivity can have significant health benefits. The pervasive nature of mobile phones increasingly allows individuals to track and measure their own physical activity thus creating opportunities for them to reflect on their behavior and make informed changes. In this work, we investigated two mechanisms for encouraging a more active lifestyle: a glanceable display of an individual's level of physical activity and mobile phone vibrations to interrupt extended periods of inactivity. We found that both mechanisms can help users become more aware of their activity patterns but may be ignored unless coupled with concrete advice on how to incorporate active moments into their day.

References

  1. Ainsworth, B. E., Leon, A. S., Richardson, M. T., Jacobs, D. R. & Paffenbarger Jr, R. S. Accuracy of the college alumnus physical activity questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 12 (1993), 14031411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bey, L. & Hamilton, M. T. Suppression of skeletal muscle lipoprotein lipase activity during physical inactivity: a molecular reason to maintain daily lowintensity activity. J Physiol, 551, Pt 2 (2003), 673--682.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fan, C., Forlizzi, J. & Dey, A. A Spark Of Activity: Exploring Information Art As Visualization For Physical Activity. In Ubicomp 2012 2012, (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fitbit. The Magic of 10,000 steps. http://blog.fitbit.com/?p=194. Accessed September 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujiki, Y., Kazakos, K., Puri, C., Buddharaju, P., Pavlidis, I. & Levine, J. NEAT-o-Games: blending physical activity and fun in the daily routine. Comput. Entertain., 6, 2 (2008), 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hamilton, M. T., Hamilton, D. G. & Zderic, T. W. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes, 56, 11 (2007), 2655--2667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lin, J. J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G. & Strub, H. B. Fish'n'Steps: encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In Ubicomp 2006, Springer-Verlag (2006) 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Manohar, C. U., Koepp, G. A., McCrady-Spitzer, S. K. & Levine, J. A. A Stand-Alone Accelerometer System for Free-Living Individuals to Measure and Promote Physical Activity. ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition, 4, 4 (2012), 222--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Morris, D., Brush, A. J. B. & Meyers, B. R. SuperBreak: using interactivity to enhance ergonomic typing breaks. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems 2008, ACM (2008) 1817--1826. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Munson, S. A. & Consolvo, S. Exploring goal-setting, rewards, self-monitoring, and sharing to motivate physical activity. In PervasiveHealth 2012, (2012) 2532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Norman, G. & Mills, P. Keeping it Simple: Encouraging walking as a means to active living. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 3 (2004), 149--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Patel, A. V., Bernstein, L., Deka, A., Feigelson, H. S., Campbell, P. T., Gapstur, S. M., Colditz, G. A. & Thun, M. J. Leisure Time Spent Sitting in Relation to Total Mortality in a Prospective Cohort of US Adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 172, 4 (2010), 419--429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Schneider, P. L., Bassett, D. R., Thompson, D. L., Pronk, N. P. & Bielak, K. M. Effects of a 10,000 Steps per Day Goal in Overweight Adults. American Journal of Health Promotion, 21, 2 (2006), 85--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Stouffs, A. Interruptions as Multimodal Outputs: Which are the Less Disruptive? In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces 2002, IEEE Computer Society (2002) 479. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Toscos, T., Faber, A., An, S. & Gandhi, M. Chick clique: persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise. In CHI 2006, ACM (2006) 1873--1878. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. van der Ploeg, H. P., Chey, T., Korda, R. J., Banks, E. & Bauman, A. Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222 497 Australian adults. Arch Intern Med, 172, 6 (2012), 494--500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. WalkMinder: encouraging an active lifestyle using mobile phone interruptions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3360 pages
      ISBN:9781450319522
      DOI:10.1145/2468356

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader