skip to main content
research-article

A high-frequency sampling monitoring system for environmental and structural applications

Published:23 July 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

High-frequency sampling is not only a prerogative of high-energy physics or machinery diagnostic monitoring: critical environmental and structural health monitoring applications also have such a challenging constraint. Moreover, such unique design constraints are often coupled with the requirement of high synchronism among the distributed acquisition units, minimal energy consumption, and large communication bandwidth. Such severe constraints have led scholars to suggest wired centralized monitoring solutions, which have only recently been complemented with wireless technologies. This article suggests a hybrid wireless-wired monitoring system combining the advantages of wireless and wired technologies within a distributed high-frequency-sampling framework. The suggested architecture satisfies the mentioned constraints, thanks to an ad-hoc design of the hardware, the availability of efficient energy management policies, and up-to-date harvesting mechanisms. At the same time, the architecture supports adaptation capabilities by relying on the remote reprogrammability of key application parameters. The proposed architecture has been successfully deployed in the Swiss-Italian Alps to monitor the collapse of rock faces in three geographical areas.

References

  1. Akyildiz, I., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., and Cayirci, E. 2002. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 40, 8, 102--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alippi, C., Boracchi, G., Camplani, R., Marullo, A., and Roveri, M. 2012. A real-time, reprogrammable, intelligent software architecture for high-frequency sampling sensor networks. Tech. rep. Internal Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alippi, C., Camplani, R., and Galperti, C. 2007. Lossless compression techniques in wireless sensor networks: Monitoring microacoustic emissions. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE'07). IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Alippi, C., Camplani, R., Galperti, C., Marullo, A., and Roveri, M. 2010. An hybrid wireless-wired monitoring system for real-time rock collapse forecasting. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS). IEEE, 224--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Alippi, C. and Galperti, C. 2008. An adaptive system for optimal solar energy harvesting in wireless sensor network nodes. IEEE Tran. Circuits Syst. I: Regular Papers 55, 6, 1742--1750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Basharat, A., Catbas, N., and Shah, M. 2005. A framework for intelligent sensor network with video camera for structural health monitoring of bridges. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom'05). IEEE, 385--389. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Boller, C., Chang, F., and Fujino, Y. 2009. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Caicedo, J., Marulanda, J., Thomson, P., and Dyke, S. 2002. Monitoring of bridges to detect changes in structural health. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Vol. 1. IEEE, 453--458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. CrossBow. 2009. http://www.xbow.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dell'Acqua, A., Hansen, M., Ikinen, S., Lofstedt, B., Vanuxem, J., Svensson, C., Yuan, J., Hentzell, H., Del Buono, L., David, J., Genat, J., Lebbolo, H., LeDortz, O., Nayman, P., Savoy-Navarro, A., Zitoun, R., Alippi, C., Breveglieri, L., Dadda, L., Piuri, V., Salice, F., Sami, M., Stefanelli, R., Cattaneo, P., Fumagalli, G., Goggi, G., Brigati, S., Gatti, U., Maloberti, F., Torelli, G., Carlson, P., Kerek, A., Appelquist, G., Berglund, S., Bohm, C., Engstrom, M., Yamdagni, N., Sundblad, R., Hoglund, I., and Persson, S. 1993. System level policies for fault tolerance issues in the fermi project. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems. 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Eisenman, S., Miluzzo, E., Lane, N., Peterson, R., Ahn, G., and Campbell, A. 2009. Bikenet: A mobile sensing system for cyclist experience mapping. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. (TOSN) 6, 1, 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. ENEA. 1999. http://clisun.casaccia.enea.it/pagine/tabelleradiazione.htm. In Tabella della Radiazione Solare, ENEA - Italian National agency for new technologies, Energy and sustainable economic development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Engel, J., Zhao, L., Fan, Z., Chen, J., and Liu, C. 2004. Smart brick-a low cost, modular wireless sensor for civil structure monitoring. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing, Communications and Control Technologies (CCCT'04).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrar, C., Park, G., and Todd, M. 2011. Sensing network paradigms for structural health monitoring. New Developments in Sensing Technology for Structural Health Monitoring, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 96, Springer, 137--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrar, C. and Worden, K. 2007. An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosop. Tran. Royal Soc. A: Math. Physical Eng. Sci. 365, 1851, 303.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser, S. 2005. Terra-Scope: A MEMS-based vertical seismic array. Proc. SPIE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Grattan, S., Taylor, S., Basheer, P., Sun, T., and Grattan, K. 2009. Structural health monitoring-better solutions using fiber optic sensors? In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors Confernce. IEEE, 811--814.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gungor, V. and Hancke, G. 2009. Industrial wireless sensor networks: Challenges, design principles, and technical approaches. IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron. 56, 10, 4258--4265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Hu, W., Bulusu, N., Chou, C., Jha, S., Taylor, A., and Tran, V. 2009. Design and evaluation of a hybrid sensor network for cane toad monitoring. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. (TOSN) 5, 1, 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ingelrest, F., Barrenetxea, G., Schaefer, G., Vetterli, M., Couach, O., and Parlange, M. 2010. Sensorscope: Application-specific sensor network for environmental monitoring. ACM Tran. Sen. Netw. (TOSN) 6, 2, 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Johnson, W., Auld, B., and Alers, G. 1994. Spectroscopy of resonant torsional modes in cylindrical rods using electromagnetic-acoustic transduction. J. Acoustical Soc. Am. 95, 1413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kim, S., Pakzad, S., Culler, D., Demmel, J., Fenves, G., Glaser, S., and Turon, M. 2007. Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, 254--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lawrenz, W. 1997. Can System Engineering: From Theory to Practical Applications 1st Ed. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lim, S. and Shoureshi, R. 2003. Neural-based monitoring system for health assessment of electric transmission lines. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2270--2275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lim, S. and Shoureshi, R. 2006. Advanced monitoring system for integrity assessment of electric power transmission lines. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference. IEEE, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lynch, J., Law, K., Kiremidjian, A., Carryer, E., Farrar, C., Sohn, H., Allen, D., Nadler, B., and Wait, J. 2004. Design and performance validation of a wireless sensing unit for structural monitoring applications. Struct. Eng. Mech. 17, 3--4, 393--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Lynch, J., Partridge, A., Law, K., Kenny, T., Kiremidjian, A., and Carryer, E. 2003. Design of piezoresistive MEMS-based accelerometer for integration with wireless sensing unit for structural monitoring. J. Aerospace Eng. 16, 108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Maróti, M., Kusy, B., Simon, G., and Lédeczi, A. 2004. The flooding time synchronization protocol. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 39--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Moteiv. 2007. Tmote invent. http://www.moteiv.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Paek, J., Chintalapudi, K., Caffrey, J., Govindan, R., and Masri, S. 2005. A wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: Performance and experience. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Embeded Sensor Networks. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Paek, J., Greenstein, B., Gnawali, O., Jang, K., Joki, A., Vieira, M., Hicks, J., Estrin, D., Govindan, R., and Kohler, E. 2010. The tenet architecture for tiered sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. (TOSN) 6, 4, 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ramamurthy, H., Prabhu, B., Gadh, R., and Madni, A. 2007. Wireless industrial monitoring and control using a smart sensor platform. IEEE Sensors J. 7, 5, 611--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Rice, J. and Spencer Jr, B. 2008. Structural health monitoring sensor development for the Imote2 platform. In Proceedings of SPIE, Sensor and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical and Aerospace Systems. doi:10.1117/12.776695.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Rice, J. and Spencer Jr, B. 2009. Flexible smart sensor framework for autonomous full-scale structural health monitoring. Newmark Struct. Eng. Labo. Report Series 018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmid, J., Gädeke, T., Stork, W., Hennrich, H., and Blank, T. 2010. A wireless MEMS-sensor network concept for the condition monitoring of ball screw drives in industrial plants. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 425--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sisgeo. 2012. http://www.sisgeo.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Solgeo. 2012. http://www.solgeo.eu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Werner-Allen, G., Lorincz, K., Welsh, M., Marcillo, O., Johnson, J., Ruiz, M., and Lees, J. 2006. Deploying a wireless sensor network on an active volcano. IEEE Int. Comput. 18--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A high-frequency sampling monitoring system for environmental and structural applications

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
            ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 9, Issue 4
            July 2013
            523 pages
            ISSN:1550-4859
            EISSN:1550-4867
            DOI:10.1145/2489253
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 July 2013
            • Accepted: 1 September 2012
            • Revised: 1 April 2012
            • Received: 1 October 2011
            Published in tosn Volume 9, Issue 4

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader