ABSTRACT
Any human-computer interface imposes a certain level of cognitive load to the user task. Analogously, the task itself also imposes different levels of cognitive load. It is common sense in 3D user interfaces research that a higher number of degrees of freedom increases the interface cognitive load. If the cognitive load is significant, it might compromise the user performance and undermine the evaluation of user skills in a virtual environment. In this paper, we propose an assessment of two immersive VR interfaces with varying degrees of freedom in two VR tasks: risk perception and basic object selection. We examine the effectiveness of both interfaces in these two different tasks. Results show that the number of degrees of freedom does not significantly affect a basic selection task, but it affects risk perception task in an unexpected way.
- Akiyoshi, M., Miwa, S., Ueda, T., and Nishida, S. 1995. A learning environment for maintenance of power equipment using virtual reality. In Image Processing and its Applications, 1995., Fifth International Conference on, 331--335.Google Scholar
- Bingda, Z., Shiwei, X., and Dong, W. 2000. The training simulation system for substation based on network and expert system. In Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management, 2000. APSCOM-00. 2000 International Conference on, vol. 2, 532--536 vol.2.Google Scholar
- Bowman, D. A., Koller, D., and Hodges, L. F. 1997. Travel in immersive virtual environments: An evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 45--52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bowman, D. A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J. J., and Poupyrev, I. 2004. 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buriol, T. M., Rosendo, M., de Geus, K., Scheer, S., and Felsky, C. E. 2011. A pervasive and tangible interface for interaction and visualization on a virtual reality training system. Revista Realidade Virtual - LATEC/UFRJ 4, 2 (December), 18--42.Google Scholar
- Chang, Z., Fang, Y., Zhang, Y., and Hu, C. 2010. A training simulation system for substation equipments maintenance. In Machine Vision and Human-Machine Interface (MVHI), 2010 International Conference on, 572--575. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glendon, A. I., Clarke, S., and McKenna, E. F. 2006. Human safety and risk management, 2nd ed. ed. CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL:.Google Scholar
- Rosendo, M., Buriol, T., de Geus, K., Scheer, S., and Felsky, C. 2011. Towards the development of a 3d serious game for training in power network maintenance. In Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), 2011 Third International Conference on, 16--23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sebok, A., Nystad, E., and Droivoldsmo, A. 2002. Improving safety and human performance in maintenance and out-age planning through virtual reality-based training systems. In Human Factors and Power Plants, 2002. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th Conference on, 8-14--8-22.Google Scholar
- Sjöberg, L. 2000. The methodology of risk perception research. Quality and Quantity 34, 407--418.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suma, E. A., Lipps, Z., Finkelstein, S., Krum, D. M., and Bolas, M. 2012. Impossible Spaces: Maximizing natural walking in virtual environments with self-overlapping architecture. In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proceedings Virtual Reality), 555--564. (Best Paper Honorable Mention). Google ScholarDigital Library
- van Wyk, E., and de Villiers, R. 2009. Virtual reality training applications for the mining industry. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualisation and Interaction in Africa, ACM, New York, NY, USA, AFRIGRAPH '09, 53--63. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Veit, M., Capobianco, A., and Bechmann, D. 2009. Influence of degrees of freedom's manipulation on performances during orientation tasks in virtual reality environments. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, ACM, New York, NY, USA, VRST '09, 51--58. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Interacting with danger in an immersive environment: issues on cognitive load and risk perception
Recommendations
Immersive interactive technologies and virtual shopping experiences: Differences in consumer perceptions between augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR)
Highlights- This study investigated the functional mechanisms of AR and VR in impacting user perceptions and behaviors in virtual shopping environments.
AbstractBased on the concepts of the Reality-Virtuality (RV) continuum and the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) framework, this study investigated differences between AR and VR in their effects on vividness/interactivity, a sense of presence, ...
Command & control cube: a shortcut paradigm for virtual environments
EGVE'01: Proceedings of the 7th Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments & 5th Immersive Projection TechnologyNew immersive virtual environments (VE) such as the Responsive WorkbenchTM provide users with a very attractive way of interacting with 3D computer-generated worlds. The feeling of immersion is one of the many advantages of such configurations. Being ...
Head turn scaling below the threshold of perception in immersive virtual environments
VRST '16: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and TechnologyImmersive virtual environments allow to experience presence, the feeling of being present in a virtual environment. When accessing virtual reality with virtual reality goggles, head tracking is used to update the virtual viewpoint according to the user'...
Comments