skip to main content
10.1145/2505515.2505727acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Top-down keyword query processing on XML data

Published:27 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Efficiently answering XML keyword queries has attracted much research effort in the last decade. One key factors resulting in the inefficiency of existing methods are the common-ancestor-repetition (CAR) and visiting-useless-nodes (VUN) problems. In this paper, we propose a generic top-down processing strategy to answer a given keyword query w.r.t. LCA/SLCA/ELCA semantics. By top-down, we mean that we visit all common ancestor (CA) nodes in a depth-first, left-to-right order, thus avoid the CAR problem; by generic, we mean that our method is independent of the labeling schemes and query semantics. We show that the satisfiability of a node v w.r.t. the given semantics can be determined by v's child nodes, based on which our methods avoid the VUN problem. We propose two algorithms that are based on either traditional inverted lists or our newly proposed LLists to improve the overall performance. The experimental results verify the benefits of our methods according to various evaluation metrics.

References

  1. L. J. Chen and Y. Papakonstantinou. Supporting top-k keyword search in xml databases. In ICDE, pages 689--700, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Y. Chen, W. Wang, and Z. Liu. Keyword-based search and exploration on databases. In ICDE, pages 1380--1383, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Cohen, J. Mamou, Y. Kanza, and Y. Sagiv. Xsearch: A semantic search engine for xml. In VLDB, pages 45--56, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Guo, F. Shao, C. Botev, and J. Shanmugasundaram. Xrank: Ranked keyword search over xml documents. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 16--27, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. V. Hristidis, N. Koudas, Y. Papakonstantinou, and D. Srivastava. Keyword proximity search in xml trees. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 18(4):525--539, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Kong, R. Gilleron, and A. Lemay. Retrieving meaningful relaxed tightest fragments for xml keyword search. In EDBT, pages 815--826, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. G. Li, J. Feng, J. Wang, and L. Zhou. Effective keyword search for valuable lcas over xml documents. In CIKM, pages 31--40, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. Li, C. Yu, and H. V. Jagadish. Schema-free xquery. In VLDB, pages 72--83, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Z. Liu and Y. Chen. Reasoning and identifying relevant matches for xml keyword search. PVLDB, 1(1):921--932, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Sun, C. Y. Chan, and A. K. Goenka. Multiway slca-based keyword search in xml data. In WWW, pages 1043--1052, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. I. Tatarinov, S. Viglas, K. S. Beyer, J. Shanmugasundaram, E. J. Shekita, and C. Zhang. Storing and querying ordered xml using a relational database system. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 204--215, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. Wang, X. Wang, and A. Zhou. Hash-search: An efficient slca-based keyword search algorithm on xml documents. In DASFAA, pages 496--510, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Xu and Y. Papakonstantinou. Efficient keyword search for smallest lcas in xml databases. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 537--538, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Xu and Y. Papakonstantinou. Efficient lca based keyword search in xml data. In EDBT, pages 535--546, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Zhou, Z. Bao, W. Wang, T. W. Ling, Z. Chen, X. Lin, and J. Guo. Fast slca and elca computation for xml keyword queries based on set intersection. In ICDE, pages 905--916, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Zhou, Z. Bao, W. Wang, J. Zhao, and X. Meng. Efficient query processing for xml keyword queries based on the idlist index. The VLDB Journal, DOI: 10.1007/s00778-013-0313-2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Zhou, X. Zhao, W. Wang, Z. Chen, and J. X. Yu. Topdown keyword query processing on xml data. Technical report, University of New South Wales, CSR-TR-2013-21, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Zhou, C. Liu, and J. Li. Fast elca computation for keyword queries on xml data. In EDBT, pages 549--560, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Top-down keyword query processing on XML data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
          October 2013
          2612 pages
          ISBN:9781450322638
          DOI:10.1145/2505515

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 27 October 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CIKM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate143of848submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader