Understanding multitasking through parallelized strategy exploration and individualized cognitive modeling

ABSTRACT

Human multitasking often involves complex task interactions and subtle tradeoffs which might be best understood through detailed computational cognitive modeling, yet traditional cognitive modeling approaches may not explore a sufficient range of task strategies to reveal the true complexity of multitasking behavior. This study proposes a systematic approach for exploring a large number of strategies using a computer-cluster-based parallelized modeling system. The paper demonstrates the efficacy of the approach for investigating and revealing the effects of different microstrategies on human performance, both within and across individuals, for a time-pressured multimodal dual task. The modeling results suggest that multitasking performance is not simply a matter of interleaving cognitive and sensorimotor processing but is instead heavily influenced by the selection of subtask microstrategies.

References

1. Ballas, J., Heitmeyer, C., and Perez-Quinones, M. (1992). Evaluating two aspects of direct manipulation in advanced cockpits. In Proceedings of CHI, 127--134.
2. Brumby, D. P., Salvucci, D. D., and Howes, A. (2009). Focus on driving: How cognitive constraints shape the adaptation of strategy when dialing while driving. In Proceedings of CHI, 1629--1638.
3. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Gluck, K. A., Stanley, C. T., Moore, L. R., Reitter, D., and Halbrügge, M. (2010). Exploration for understanding in cognitive modeling. Journal of Arti'cial General Intelligence, 2(2), 88--107.
5. Gray, W. D. and Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2000). Milliseconds matter: An introduction to microstrategies and to their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. J. Exp. Psychol.: Applied, 6(4), 322--335.
6. Halverson, T. and Hornof, A. J. (2011). A computational model of "active vision" for visual search in human-computer interaction. HumanComputer Interaction, 26, 285--314.
7. Hornof, A. J. and Zhang, Y. (2010). Task-constrained interleaving of perceptual and motor processes in a time-critical dual task as revealed through eye tracking. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 97--102.
8. Hornof, Zhang, and Halverson (2010). Knowing where and when to look in a time-critical multimodal dual task. In Proceedings of CHI, 2103--2112.
9. Howes, A., Lewis, R. L., and Vera, A. (2009). Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: Implications for testing theories of cognition and action. Psychological Review, 116(4), 717--751.
10. Janssen, C., Brumby, D., Dowell, J., Chater, N., and Howes, A. (2011). Identifying optimum performance trade-offs using a cognitively bounded rational analysis model of discretionary task interleaving. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(1), 123--139.
11. Kieras, D. E. and Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 12(4), 391--438.
12. Kieras, D. E. and Meyer, D. E. (2000). The role of cognitive task analysis in the application of predictive models of human performance. In J. M. Schraagen, S. F. Chipman, V. L. Shalin, & V. Shalin (Eds.), Cognitive task analysis (pp. 237--260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbsum.
13. Olson, R. L., Hanowski, R. J., Hickman, J. S., and Bocanegra, J. (2009). Driver distraction in commercial vehicle operations. Technical report #FMCSARRR-09-045. U.S. Dept. of Transportation.
14. Roberts, S. and Pashler, H. (2000). How persuasive is a good 't' A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review, 107(2), 358--367.
15. Richtel, M. (2009, December 6). Promoting the car phone, despite risks. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com.
16. Salvucci, D. and Taatgen, N. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115(1), 101--130.
17. Sanford, E. C. (1888). Personal equation. The American Journal of Psychology, 2(1), pp. 3--38.
18. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159--177.
19. Williams, A. F. and Lund A. K. (1986). Seat belt use laws and occupant crash protection in the USA. Am. J. Public Health, 76(12), 1438--1442.
20. Zhang, Y. and Hornof, A. (2012). A discrete movement model for cursor tracking derived from moment-tomoment tracking data and the modeling of a dual-task experiment. In Proceedings of the 56th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1000--1024.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Artificial intelligence

    • Philosophical/theoretical foundations of artificial intelligence

  • Modeling and simulation

    • Model development and analysis

      • Model verification and validation

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)