skip to main content
10.1145/2567948.2580058acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Language technologies for enhancement of teaching and learning in writing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Writing is a vital issue for education as well as a fundamental skill in teaching and learning. With the development of information technologies, more and more professional writing tools emerge. As each of them mostly concentrates on addressing a specific issue, people need a one-stop platform, which could integrate multiply functions. In addition, with the supported concept of e-learning ecosystem for future education, a comprehensive platform will be more promising. Therefore, we introduce VeriGuide Platform, which provides a professional writing toolbox to promote the enhancement of teaching and learning in writing. It contains six vertical components, which could be split into two groups. The first group, Editing Assistance, facilitates students write papers and point out grammar and spelling errors. While the second group, Text Analysis, offers document analysis results, which enables students to achieve further writing improvement with explanatory feedbacks. Furthermore, we could do education data analytics to enhance the efficiency of teaching and learning. Specifically, the Editing Assistance contains well-organized writing and formatting, and grammar and spelling checking, while readability assessment, similarity detection, citation analysis, and sentiment analysis are included in the Text Analysis.

References

  1. Cecilia Barnbaum. Plagiarism: A student's guide to recognizing it and avoiding it. Valdosta State University, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Vanessa Chang and Christian Guetl. E-learning ecosystem (eles)-a holistic approach for the development of more effective learning environment for small-and-medium sized enterprises (smes). In Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference, 2007. DEST'07. Inaugural IEEE-IES, pages 420--425. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chi Hong Cheong, Tak Pang Lau, and Irwin King. Policy and issues in deploying automated plagiarism detection systems in academic communities: A case study of veriguide. Ict Ethics and Security in the 21st Century: New Developments and Applications, page 172, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Patricia Clarke, Daniel Schull, Glen Coleman, Rachael Pitt, and Catherine Manathunga. Enhancing professional writing skills of veterinary technology students: linking assessment and clinical practice in a communications course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3):273--287, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Edgar Dale and Jeanne S Chall. A formula for predicting readability. Educational research bulletin, 27:11--28, 1948.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bo Dong, Qinghua Zheng, Jie Yang, Haifei Li, and Mu Qiao. An e-learning ecosystem based on cloud computing infrastructure. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2009. ICALT 2009. Ninth IEEE International Conference on, pages 125--127. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Rudolph Flesch. A new readability yardstick. Journal of applied psychology, 32(3):221, 1948.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Edward Fry. Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21(3):242--252, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Robert Gunning. The technique of clear writing. McGraw-Hill New York, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mahabalagiri N Hegde. Acoursebookonscientificand professional writing for speech-language pathology. CengageBrain. com, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Judy Hunter. The importance of citation. URL: http://web.grinnell.edu/Dean/Tutorial/EUS/IC.pdf (12.04. 2007.), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrie A Keen. inguistic development in english, chinese and persian children: a longitudinal comparison. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. George R Klare. The measurement of readability. Iowa State University Press, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Christine L Latham and Nancy Ahern. Professional writing in nursing education: Creating an academic-community writing center. The Journal of nursing education, pages 1--10, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mary R Lea and Brian V Street. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in higher education, 23(2):157--172, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bing Liu. Sentiment analysis: A multi-faceted problem. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25(3):76--80, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. UDEN LORNA and ERNESTO DAMIANI. The future of e-learning: Elearning ecosystem. In Proceedings of the first IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, Cairns, Australia, volume 100, pages 113--117, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. G Harry McLaughlin. Smog grading: A new readability formula. Journal of reading, 12(8):639--646, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the 42nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, page 271. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. LAU Tak Pang. Chinese readability analysis and its applications on the internet. Master's thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lucy Rai and Theresa Lillis. 'getting it write'in social work: exploring the value of writing in academia to writing for professional practice. Teaching in Higher Education, (ahead-of-print):1--13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ethan T Vishniac. What is plagiarism? In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts# 219, volume 219, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohammad Zohrabi and Parvin Rezaie. The role of form-focused feedback on developing students' writing skill. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7):1514--1519, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Language technologies for enhancement of teaching and learning in writing

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            WWW '14 Companion: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web
            April 2014
            1396 pages
            ISBN:9781450327459
            DOI:10.1145/2567948

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 April 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader