Software engineering for multi-tenancy computing challenges and implications

ABSTRACT

Multi-tenancy is a cloud computing phenomenon. Multiple instances of an application occupy and share resources from a large pool, allowing different users to have their own version of the same application running and coexisting on the same hardware but in isolated virtual spaces. In this position paper we survey the current landscape of multi-tenancy, laying out the challenges and complexity of software engineering where multi-tenancy issues are involved. Multi-tenancy allows cloud service providers to better utilise computing resources, supporting the development of more flexible services to customers based on economy of scale, reducing overheads and infrastructural costs. Nevertheless, there are major challenges in migration from single tenant applications to multi-tenancy. These have not been fully explored in research or practice to date. In particular, the reengineering effort of multi-tenancy in Software-as-a-Service cloud applications requires many complex and important aspects that should be taken into consideration, such as security, scalability, scheduling, data isolation, etc. Our study emphasizes scheduling policies and cloud provisioning and deployment with regards to multi-tenancy issues. We employ CloudSim and MapReduce in our experiments to simulate and analyse multi-tenancy models, scenarios, performance, scalability, scheduling and reliability on cloud platforms.

References

1. M. Almorsy, J. Grundy, and A. S. Ibrahim. Smurf: Supporting multi-tenancy using re-aspects framework. In Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS), pages 361–370. IEEE, 2012.
2. M. Almorsy, J. Grundy, and A. S. Ibrahim. Adaptable, model-driven security engineering for saas cloud-based applications. Automated Software Engineering, pages 1–38, 2013.
3. M. Almorsy, J. Grundy, and I. Müller. An analysis of the cloud computing security problem. In the proc. of the 2010 Asia Pacific Cloud Workshop, Colocated with APSEC2010, Australia, 2010.
4. D. Banks, J. Erickson, and M. Rhodes. Multi-tenancy in cloud-based collaboration services. Information Systems Journal, 2009.
5. C.-P. Bezemer and A. Zaidman. Challenges of reengineering into multi-tenant saas applications.
6. C.-P. Bezemer and A. Zaidman. Multi-tenant saas applications: maintenance dream or nightmare? In Proceedings of the Joint ERCIM Workshop on Software Evolution (EVOL) and International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE), pages 88–92. ACM, 2010.
7. C.-P. Bezemer, A. Zaidman, B. Platzbeecker, T. Hurkmans, and A. t Hart. Enabling multi-tenancy: An industrial experience report. In Software Maintenance (ICSM), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2010.
8. R. Calheiros, R. Ranjan, C. De Rose, and R. Buyya. Cloudsim: A novel framework for modeling and simulation of cloud computing infrastructures and services. arXiv preprint arXiv:0903.2525, 2009.
9. R. N. Calheiros, R. Ranjan, A. Beloglazov, C. A. De Rose, and R. Buyya. Cloudsim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Software: Practice and Experience, 41(1):23–50, 2011.
10. F. Chen, J. Grundy, J.-G. Schneider, Y. Yang, and Q. He. Automated analysis of performance and energy consumption for cloud applications. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/SPEC international conference on Performance engineering, pages 39–50. ACM, 2014.
11. X. Cheng, Y. Shi, and Q. Li. A multi-tenant oriented performance monitoring, detecting and scheduling architecture based on sla. In Pervasive Computing (JCPC), 2009 Joint Conferences on, pages 599–604. IEEE, 2009.
12. F. Chong. Multi-tenancy and virtualization.
13. L. Cui, T. Zhang, G. Xu, and D. Yuan. A scheduling algorithm for multi-tenants instance-intensive workflows. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 7, 2013.
14. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat. Mapreduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM, 51(1):107–113, 2008.
15. I. Foster, Y. Zhao, I. Raicu, and S. Lu. Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. In Grid Computing Environments Workshop, 2008. GCE’08, pages 1–10. IEEE, 2008.
16. G. C. Frederick Chong and R. Wolter. Multi-tenant data architecture.
17. A. Gohad, K. Ponnalagu, and N. C. Narendra. Model driven provisioning in multi-tenant clouds. In Global Conference (SRII), Annual, pages 11–20. IEEE, 2012.
18. C. J. Guo, W. Sun, Y. Huang, Z. H. Wang, and B. Gao. A framework for native multi-tenancy application development and management. In E-Commerce Technology and the 4th International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services, pages 551–558. IEEE, 2007.
19. Hadoop. Capacity scheduler. In http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.2.0/hadoopyarn/hadoop-yarn-site/CapacityScheduler.html.
20. Hadoop. Fair scheduler. In http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.2.0/hadoopyarn/hadoop-yarn-site/CapacityScheduler.html.
21. Q. He, J. Han, Y. Yang, J. Grundy, and H. Jin. Qos-driven service selection for multi-tenant saas. In Cloud computing (cloud), pages 566–573. IEEE, 2012.
22. F. H. Judith Hurwitz, Marcia Kaufman and D. Kirsch. Multi-tenancy and its benefits in a saas cloud computing environment.
23. T. Kwok and A. Mohindra. Resource calculations with constraints, and placement of tenants and instances for multi-tenant saas applications. In Service-Oriented Computing, ICSOC, pages 633–648. Springer, 2008.
24. T. Kwok, T. Nguyen, and L. Lam. A software as a service with multi-tenancy support for an electronic contract management application. In Services Computing, 2008. SCC’08. IEEE International Conference on, volume 2, pages 179–186. IEEE, 2008.
25. J. Y. Lee, J. W. Lee, S. D. Kim, et al. A quality model for evaluating software-as-a-service in cloud computing. In Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, SERA. 7th ACIS International Conference, pages 261–266. IEEE, 2009.
26. R. Malhotra and P. Jain. Study and comparison of various cloud simulators available in the cloud computing. International Journal, 3(9), 2013.
27. P. Mell and T. Grance. The nist definition of cloud computing (draft). NIST special publication, 800(145):7, 2011.
28. R. Mietzner, T. Unger, R. Titze, and F. Leymann. Combining different multi-tenancy patterns in service-oriented applications. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2009. EDOC’09. IEEE International, pages 131–140. IEEE, 2009.
29. J. Petersson. Best practices for cloud computing multi-tenancy.
30. J. Ru and J. Keung. An empirical investigation on the simulation of priority and shortest-job-first scheduling for cloud-based software systems. In Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC), 2013 22nd Australian, pages 78–87. IEEE, 2013.
31. S. Selvarani and G. Sadhasivam. Improved cost-based algorithm for task scheduling in cloud computing. In Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), IEEE International Conference on, 2010.
32. B. Warfield. Multitenancy can have a 16:1 cost advantage over single-tenant. 2007.
33. T. White. Hadoop: The definitive guide. O’Reilly Media, 2012.
34. K. Wood and M. Anderson. Understanding the complexity surrounding multitenancy in cloud computing. In e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), 8th Conference on, pages 119–124. IEEE, 2011.
35. L.-J. Zhang, J. Fiaidhi, I. Bojanova, and J. Zhang. Enforcing multitenancy for cloud computing environments. IT professional, 14(1):0016–18, 2012.
36. Q. Zhang, L. Cheng, and R. Boutaba. Cloud computing: state-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 1(1):7–18, 2010.

Index Terms

• Computer systems organization

  • Architectures

    • Distributed architectures

• Computing methodologies

  • Modeling and simulation

• General and reference

  • Cross-computing tools and techniques

    • Metrics

• Software and its engineering

  • Software organization and properties

    • Software system structures

      • Distributed systems organizing principles