skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702423acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
note

Remote Paper Prototype Testing

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

To test paper prototypes of mobile applications, we have been experimenting with remote paper prototype testing as an approach and tool for enabling a designer to wizard a paper prototype from afar while a user tests the prototype out of the lab. This paper presents a system for remote paper prototype testing that consists of (1) a video camera placed over a paper prototype, which streams a live audio-visual feed via Google Hangouts to a tester, and (2) Google Glass on the tester, which streams a live audio-visual-data feed to the facilitator and wizard. Results from a pilot study found that remote paper prototype testing helped designers gain valuable insights through use in realistic scenarios.

References

  1. Been-Lirn Duh, H., Tan, G. C. B. and Chen, V. H. 2006. Usability evaluation for mobile device: a comparison of laboratory and field tests. In MobileHCI '06 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bernstein, M., Brandt, J., Miller, R.C. and Karger, D.R. Crowds in two seconds: Enabling real-time crowdpowered interfaces. In UIST '11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bigham, J., Jayant, C., Ji, H., Little, G., Miller, A., Miller, R., Miller, R. and Yeh, T. VizWiz: nearly realtime answers to visual questions. In UIST '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bolchini, D., Pulido, D., & Faiola, A. (2009). Paper in screen prototyping: an agile technique to anticipate the mobile experience. Interactions, 16(4), 29--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. de Sá, M. and Carriço, L. 2008. Lessons from early stages design of mobile applications. In MobileHCI '08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. de Sá, M. and Carriço, L. 2009. A mobile tool for in-situ prototyping. In MobileHCI '09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kjeldskov, J. and Stage, J. New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Volume 60, Issues 5-6, May 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lumsden, J., MacLean, R. A Comparison of PseudoPaper and Paper Prototyping Methods for Mobile Evaluations. MONET '2008, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nielsen, C.M., Overgaard, M., Pedersen, M.B., Stage, J. and Stenild, S. 2006. It's worth the hassle!: the added value of evaluating the usability of mobile systems in the field. In NordiCHI '06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Raento, M.; Oulasvirta, A.; Petit, R.; Toivonen, H. ContextPhone: a prototyping platform for context-aware mobile applications. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, vol.4, no.2, pp.51--59, Jan.-March 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rettig, M. 1994. Prototyping for tiny fingers. Commun. ACM 37, 4 (April 1994), 21--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Remote Paper Prototype Testing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • note

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader