skip to main content
10.1145/2723576.2723627acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Learning analytics beyond the LMS: the connected learning analytics toolkit

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a Connected Learning Analytics (CLA) toolkit, which enables data to be extracted from social media and imported into a Learning Record Store (LRS), as defined by the new xAPI standard. A number of implementation issues are discussed, and a mapping that will enable the consistent storage and then analysis of xAPI verb/object/activity statements across different social media and online environments is introduced. A set of example learning activities are proposed, each facilitated by the Learning Analytics beyond the LMS that the toolkit enables.

References

  1. A. Bakharia and S. Dawson. SNAPP: A bird's-eye view of temporal participant interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK '11, pages 168--173, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Brown and R. Adler. Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1): 16--32, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Deakin Crick. Learning how to learn: the dynamic assessment of learning power. Curriculum Journal, 18(2): 135--153, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Dron and T. Anderson. Teaching Crowds. Learning and social media. Au Press, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Garrison, T. Anderson, and W. Archer. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2--3): 87--105, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Mott. Envisioning the post-LMS era: The open learning network. EDUCAUSE Quarterly Magazine, 33: 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Pardo and G. Siemens. Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3): 438--450, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. Siemens. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Technical report, elearnspace, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. Siemens. Massive open online courses: Innovation in education? In Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice, pages 5--15. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. G. Siemens, D. Gašević, C. Haythornthwaite, S. Dawson, S. Buckingham Shum, R. Ferguson, E. Duval, K. Verbert, and R. Baker. Open learning analytics: An integrated and modularized platform. Concept paper, SoLAR, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Learning analytics beyond the LMS: the connected learning analytics toolkit

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          LAK '15: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge
          March 2015
          448 pages
          ISBN:9781450334174
          DOI:10.1145/2723576

          Copyright © 2015 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 16 March 2015

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          LAK '15 Paper Acceptance Rate20of74submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader