skip to main content
10.1145/2745555.2746654acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Complementing standards by demonstrating commitment and progress

Published:18 May 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Improving web accessibility can be challenging, particularly for organizations with large, complex digital estates and internal organizational structures. Efforts can be guided by technical standards, but there are shortcomings with treating accessibility for people with disabilities as a compliance effort. Using the Americans with Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design as an approach to remediation of accessibility barriers in the built environment as a parallel, we explore an approach to improving digital accessibility that places value on conscious, pragmatic decision-making and sharing of evidence of progress.

References

  1. Adaptive Environments. (1995) ADA Checklist for Readily Achievable Barrier Removal. Retrieved January 2015 from http://www.ada.gov/racheck.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. British Standards Institute (2010) BS 8878: 2010---Web Accessibility Code of Practice. London: BSI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. CVAA, Final Report and Order As Released Oct 7, 2011. Retrieved January 2015 from http://www.fcc.gov/document/accessibility-rules-advanced-communications-services-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hassell, J. (2014) Including your missing 20% by embedding web and mobile accessibility. BSI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hassenzahl, M. (2013) User Experience and Experience Design. In: Soegaard, M. and Dam, R. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed. Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved January 2015 from http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/user_experience_and_experience_design.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Horton, S. and Sloan, D. (2014) Accessibility in Practice: a process-driven approach to accessibility. Inclusive Designing 2014. Springer, pp105--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kelly, B., Sloan, D., Phipps, L., Petrie, H. and Hamilton, F. Forcing Standardization or Accommodating Diversity? A Framework for Applying the WCAG in the Real World. Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nielsen, J. and Gilutz, S. Return on Investment (ROI) for Usability. Retrieved September 2013 from http://www.nngroup.com/reports/usability-return-on-investment-roi/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Power, C., Freire, A., Petrie, H. and Swallow, D. (2012) Guidelines Are Only a Half of the Story: Accessibility Problems Encountered by Blind Users on the Web. Proceedings of CHI 2012, pp433--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. United States Access Board, ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). Retrieved January 2015 from http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/background/adaag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. United States Access Board, ADA Standards, 2010, Retrieved January 2015 from http://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/ada-standards.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. ADA Update: A Primer for Small Business. Retrieved January 2015 from http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/smallbusiness/smallbusprimer2010.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Title III Updates. Retrieved January 2015 from http://www.ada.gov/t3hilght.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Vigo, M., Brown, J., and Conway, V. (2013) Benchmarking Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools: Measuring the Harm of Sole Reliance on Automated Tests. Proceedings of the 2013 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Complementing standards by demonstrating commitment and progress

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        W4A '15: Proceedings of the 12th International Web for All Conference
        May 2015
        214 pages
        ISBN:9781450333429
        DOI:10.1145/2745555

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 May 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        W4A '15 Paper Acceptance Rate11of31submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader