MultiFab: a machine vision assisted platform for multi-material 3D printing

Abstract

We have developed a multi-material 3D printing platform that is high-resolution, low-cost, and extensible. The key part of our platform is an integrated machine vision system. This system allows for self-calibration of printheads, 3D scanning, and a closed-feedback loop to enable print corrections. The integration of machine vision with 3D printing simplifies the overall platform design and enables new applications such as 3D printing over auxiliary parts. Furthermore, our platform dramatically expands the range of parts that can be 3D printed by simultaneously supporting up to 10 different materials that can interact optically and mechanically. The platform achieves a resolution of at least 40 μm by utilizing piezoelectric inkjet printheads adapted for 3D printing. The hardware is low cost (less than $7,000) since it is built exclusively from off-the-shelf components. The architecture is extensible and modular -- adding, removing, and exchanging printing modules can be done quickly. We provide a detailed analysis of the system's performance. We also demonstrate a variety of fabricated multi-material objects.

References

1. 3D Systems. Projet 5500X http://www.3dsystems.com/3d-printers/professional/projet-5500x.
2. Bickel, B., Bächer, M., Otaduy, M. A., Lee, H. R., Pfister, H., Gross, M., and Matusik, W. 2010. Design and fabrication of materials with desired deformation behavior. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4 (July), 63:1--63:10.
3. Boykov, Y., and Kolmogorov, V. 2004. An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26, 9 (Sept.), 1124--1137.
4. Burg, T., Cass, C. A. P., Groff, R., Pepper, M., and Burg, K. J. L. 2010. Building off-the-shelf tissue-engineered composites. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 368, 1839âĂŞ--1862.
5. Campbell, T. A., and Ivanova, O. S. 2013. 3D printing of multifunctional nanocomposites. Nano Today 8, 2, 119--120.
6. Chen, D., Levin, D. I. W., Didyk, P., Sitthi-Amorn, P., and Matusik, W. 2013. Spec2Fab: A reducer-tuner model for translating specifications to 3D prints. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4, 135:1--135:10.
7. Cho, W., Sachs, E. M., Patrikalakis, N. M., and Troxel, D. E. 2003. A dithering algorithm for local composition control with three-dimensional printing. Computer-aided design 35, 9, 851--867.
8. Choi, J.-W., Kim, H.-C., and Wicker, R. 2011. Multi-material stereolithography. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211, 3, 318--328.
9. Dimas, L. S., Bratzel, G. H., Eylon, I., and Buehler, M. J. 2013. Tough composites inspired by mineralized natural materials: Computation, 3D printing, and testing. Advanced Functional Materials 23, 36, 4629--4638.
10. Dong, Y., Wang, J., Pellacini, F., Tong, X., and Guo, B. 2010. Fabricating spatially-varying subsurface scattering. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 62:1--62:10.
11. Dubois, A., Grieve, K., Moneron, G., Lecaque, R., Vabre, L., and Boccara, C. 2004. Ultrahigh-resolution full-field optical coherence tomography. Appl. Opt. 43, 14 (May), 2874--2883.
12. Fab@Home. http://www.fabathome.org/.
13. Fujifilm Dimatix. Dimatix materials printer dmp-2831.
14. GelSight. Gelsight benchtop scanner. http://http://www.gelsight.com/products/.
15. Han, L.-H., Suri, S., and Schmidt, C. E. 2010. Fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for heterogeneous tissue engineering. Biomed Microdevices 12, 721--725.
16. Hašan, M., Fuchs, M., Matusik, W., Pfister, H., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2010. Physical reproduction of materials with specified subsurface scattering. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 4, 61:1--61:10.
17. Hiller, J. D., and Lipson, H. 2012. Automatic design and manufacture of soft robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 28, 2, 457--466.
18. Inamdar, A., Magana, M., Medina, F., Grajeda, Y., and Wicker, R. 2006. Development of an automated multiple material stereolithography machine. In Proceedings of 17th Annual Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, 624âĂŞ--635.
19. Khalil, S., Nam, J., and Sun, W. 2005. Multi-nozzle deposition for construction of 3d biopolymer tissue scaffolds. Rapid Prototyping Journal 11, 1, 9--17.
20. Kumar, P., Santosa, J. K., Beck, E., and Das, S. 2004. Direct-write deposition of fine powders through miniature hopper-nozzles for multi-material solid freeform fabrication. Rapid Prototyping Journal 10, 1, 14--23.
21. Kwan, J. Design of Electronics for a High-resolution, Multi-Material, and Modular 3D Printer. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
22. Lan, J. Design and Fabrication of a Modular Multi-Material 3D Printer. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
23. L. E. Weiss, R. Merz, F. P. G. N. P. P. L. S. K. R. 1997. Shape deposition manufacturing of heterogeneous structures. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 16, 4.
24. Lipton, J., Cohen, D., Heinz, M., Lobovsky, M., Parad, W., Bernstien, G., Li, T., Quartiere, J., Washington, K., Umaru, A., Masanoff, R., Granstein, J., Whitney, J., and Lipson, H. 2009. Fab@Home Model 2: Towards Ubiquitous Personal Fabrication Devices. In Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (SFF'09), 70--81.
25. Makerbot. Replicator 2X http://www.makerbot.com/.
26. Maruo, S., Ikuta, K., and Ninagawa, T. 2001. Multi-polymer microstereolithography for hybrid opto-MEMS. In The 14th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 151--154.
27. Oxman, N. 2011. Variable property rapid prototyping. Journal of Virtual and Physical Prototyping (VPP) 6, 1, 3--31.
28. Papas, M., Jarosz, W., Jakob, W., Rusinkiewicz, S., Matusik, W., and Weyrich, T. 2011. Goal-based caustics. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. Eurographics) 30, 2 (Apr.).
29. Ramos, J. MultiFab: A Multi-material 3D Printing Platform. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
30. Sachs, E., Cima, M., and Cornie, J. 1990. Three-dimensional printing: Rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a cad model. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 39, 1, 201--204.
31. Skouras, M., Thomaszewski, B., Coros, S., Bickel, B., and Gross, M. 2013. Computational design of actuated deformable characters. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (July).
32. Stratasys. Objet500 Connex Multi-Material 3D Printer http://www.stratasys.com/3D-Printers/design-series/precision/objet-connex500.
33. Szeliski, R. 2004. Image alignment and stitching: A tutorial. 89.
34. Tompkin, J., Heinzle, S., Kautz, J., and Matusik, W. 2013. Content-adaptive lenticular prints. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (July).
35. Vidimč E, K., Wang, S.-P., Ragan-Kelley, J., and Matusik, W. 2013. OpenFab: A programmable pipeline for multi-material fabrication. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4 (July).
36. Wang, L., Lau, J., Thomas, E. L., and Boyce, M. C. 2011. Co-continuous composite materials for stiffness, strength, and energy dissipation. Advanced Materials 23, 13, 1524--1529.
37. Wetzstein, G., Lanman, D., Heidrich, W., and Raskar, R. 2011. Layered 3d: tomographic image synthesis for attenuation-based light field and high dynamic range displays. ACM Trans. Graph. 30, 4, 95.
38. Willis, K. D. D., Brockmeyer, E., Hudson, S. E., and Poupyrev, I. 2012. Printed optics: 3D printing of embedded optical elements for interactive devices. In UIST.
39. Zhao, S., Hasan, M., Ramamoorthi, R., and Bala, K. 2013. Modular flux transfer: efficient rendering of high-resolution volumes with repeated structures. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 4, 131.
40. Zhou, C., Chen, Y., Yang, Z., and Khoshnevis, B. 2013. Digital material fabrication using mask-image-projectionbased stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping Journal 19, 3, 153--165.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Document management and text processing

    • Document capture

      • Graphics recognition and interpretation

• Computing methodologies

  • Computer graphics