skip to main content
10.1145/2836041.2836069acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deriving design guidelines for ambient light systems

Published:30 November 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent interest in the development of ambient light systems has initialized a new research area, where the number of ambient light systems is expected to increase in the next years. To support the development of future ambient light systems, we need clear, explicit, and structured design guidelines. In this paper we present an evaluation of light patterns in a controlled laboratory study with two complementary parts. In the first part, our aim was to reveal and analyze light patterns that encode different types of everyday information. In the second part, we verified the results from the first part by asking another group of participants about their understanding of information encoded with light. Together, our results allowed us to establish light patterns and guidelines for building new ambient light systems and applications in the future.

References

  1. Mark Altosaar, Roel Vertegaal, Changuk Sohn, and Daniel Cheng. 2006. AuraOrb: using social awareness cues in the design of progressive notification appliances. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments. ACM, 159--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Johanna Brewer, Amanda Williams, and Paul Dourish. 2005. Nimio: an ambient awareness device. In Proc. of ECSCW 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Patrick Burns, Christopher Lueg, and Shlomo Berkovsky. 2012. Activmon: encouraging physical activity through ambient social awareness. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2363--2368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Angela Chang, Ben Resner, Brad Koerner, XingChen Wang, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2001. LumiTouch: an emotional communication device. In CHI'01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 313--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Eva Deckers, Stephan Wensveen, Rene Ahn, and Kees Overbeeke. 2011. Designing for perceptual crossing to improve user involvement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1929--1938. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jutta Fortmann, Vanessa Cobus, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2014. WaterJewel: Design and Evaluation of a Bracelet to Promote a Better Drinking Behaviour. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 58-67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2677972.2677976 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jutta Fortmann, Tim Claudius Stratmann, Susanne Boll, Benjamin Poppinga, and Wilko Heuten. 2013. Make me move at work! An ambient light display to increase physical activity. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2013 7th International Conference on. IEEE, 274--277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Norbert Hammer. 2008. Mediendesign für Studium und Beruf: Grundlagenwissen und Entwurfssystematik in Layout, Typografie und Farbgestaltung. Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rebecca Hansson and Peter Ljungstrand. 2000. The reminder bracelet: subtle notification cues for mobile devices. In CHI'00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 323--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chris Harrison, John Horstman, Gary Hsieh, and Scott Hudson. 2012. Unlocking the Expressivity of Point Lights. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1683-1692. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208296 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. William R Hazlewood, Erik Stolterman, and Kay Connelly. 2011. Issues in evaluating ambient displays in the wild: two case studies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 877--886. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bettina Laugwitz, Theo Held, and Martin Schrepp. 2008. Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Brian Y Lim, Aubrey Shick, Chris Harrison, and Scott E Hudson. 2011. Pediluma: motivating physical activity through contextual information and social influence. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. ACM, 173--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Andreas Löcken, Heiko Müller, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2014. Should I stay or should I go?: Different designs to support drivers' decision making. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. ACM, 1031--1034. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Saskia Maan, Bo Merkus, Jaap Ham, and Cees Midden. 2011. Making it not too obvious: the effect of ambient light feedback on space heating energy consumption. Energy Efficiency 4, 2 (2011), 175--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Satu-Marja Mäkelä, Esa-Matti Sarjanoja, Tommi Keränen, Sari Järvinen, Vesa Pentikäinen, and Otto Korkalo. 2013. Treasure Hunt with Intelligent Luminaires. In Proceedings of International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media. ACM, 269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jennifer Mankoff, Anind K Dey, Gary Hsieh, Julie Kientz, Scott Lederer, and Morgan Ames. 2003. Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 169--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Philipp Mayring and Thomas Fenzl. 2014. Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Heiko Müller, Jutta Fortmann, Martin Pielot, Tobias Hesselmann, Benjamin Poppinga, Wilko Heuten, Niels Henze, and Susanne Boll. 2012. Ambix: Designing ambient light information displays. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Lighting workshop at DIS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Heiko Müller, Andreas Löcken, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2014. Sparkle: an ambient light display for dynamic off-screen points of interest. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. ACM, 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Heiko Müller, Martin Pielot, Wilko Heuten, Anastasia Kazakova, and Susanne Boll. 2012. Unobtrusively Reminding Users of Upcoming Tasks with Ambient Light: Ambient Timer. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (NordiCHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 801-802. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399155 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Henrika Pihlajaniemi, Toni Österlund, and Aulikki Herneoja. 2014. Urban Echoes: Adaptive and Communicative Urban Lighting in the Virtual and the Real. In Proceedings of the 2Nd Media Architecture Biennale Conference: World Cities (MAB '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 48--57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2682884.2682888 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Benjamin Poppinga, Niels Henze, Jutta Fortmann, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2012. AmbiGlasses-Information in the Periphery of the Visual Field. In Mensch & Computer. 153--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zachary Pousman and John Stasko. 2006. A Taxonomy of Ambient Information Systems: Four Patterns of Design. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 67--74. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133277 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Qian Qin, Michael Rohs, and Sven Kratz. 2011. Dynamic ambient lighting for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium adjunct on User interface software and technology. ACM, 51--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Enrico Rukzio, Michael Müller, and Robert Hardy. 2009. Design, implementation and evaluation of a novel public display for pedestrian navigation: the rotating compass. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 113--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Martin Tomitsch, Karin Kappel, Andreas Lehner, and Thomas Grechenig. 2007. Towards a taxonomy for ambient information systems. In Workshop at Pervasive. Citeseer, 42--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1997. The coming age of calm technology. In Beyond calculation. Springer, 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Amanda Williams, Shelly Farnham, and Scott Counts. 2006. Exploring wearable ambient displays for social awareness. In CHI'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1529--1534. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Cheng Xu and Kent Lyons. 2015. Shimmering Smartwatches: Exploring the Smartwatch Design Space. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 69--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Deriving design guidelines for ambient light systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MUM '15: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
      November 2015
      442 pages
      ISBN:9781450336055
      DOI:10.1145/2836041

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 November 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MUM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate33of89submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader