skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2892318acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

VapeTracker: Tracking Vapor Consumption to Help E-cigarette Users Quit

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite current controversy over e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid, we present early work based on a web survey (N=249) that shows that some e-cigarette users (46.2%) want to quit altogether, and that behavioral feedback that can be tracked can fulfill that purpose. Based on our survey findings, we designed VapeTracker, an early prototype that can attach to any e-cigarette device to track vaping activity. We discuss our future research on vaping cessation, addressing how to improve our VapeTracker prototype, ambient feedback mechanisms, and the future inclusion of behavior change models to support quitting e-cigarettes.

References

  1. L. C. Abroms, J. Lee Westmaas, J. Bontemps-Jones, R. Ramani, and J. Mellerson. 2013. A content analysis of popular smartphone apps for smoking cessation. Am J Prev Med 45, 6 (Dec 2013), 732-736.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A.A. Ali, S.M. Hossain, K. Hovsepian, M.M. Rahman, K. Plarre, and S. Kumar. 2012. mPuff: Automated detection of cigarette smoking puffs from respiration measurements. In Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 2012 ACM/IEEE 11th International Conference on. 269-280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IPSN.2012.6920942 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Swamy Ananthanarayan, Nathan Lapinski, Katie Siek, and Michael Eisenberg. 2014. Towards the Crafting of Personal Health Technologies. In Proc. DIS '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 587-596. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1145/2598510.2598581 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Aveyard, L. Massey, A. Parsons, S. Manaseki, and C. Griffin. 2009. The effect of Transtheoretical Model based interventions on smoking cessation. Soc Sci Med 68, 3 (Feb 2009), 397-403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. John Britton and Ilze Bogdanovica. 2014. Electronic cigarettes: A report commissioned by Public Health England. Technical Report. UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Nottingham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Caponnetto, D. Campagna, G. Papale, C. Russo, and R. Polosa. 2012. The emerging phenomenon of electronic cigarettes. Expert Rev Respir Med 6, 1 (Feb 2012), 63-74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding Quantified-selfers' Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. In Proc. CHI '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1143-1152. DOI:http: //dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557372 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lynne Dawkins, John Turner, Amanda Roberts, and Kirstie Soar. 2013. 'Vaping' profiles and preferences: an online survey of electronic cigarette users. Addiction 108, 6 (2013), 1115-1125. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.12150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. K. E. Farsalinos and R. Polosa. 2014. Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf 5, 2 (Apr 2014), 67-86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K. E. Farsalinos, A. Spyrou, K. Tsimopoulou, C. Stefopoulos, G. Romagna, and V. Voudris. 2014. Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices. Sci Rep 4 (2014), 4133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Alessandro Fenicio and Ganlle Calvary. 2015. Persuasion Through an Ambient Device: Proof of Concept and Early Evaluation of CRegrette, a Smoking Cessation System. In Ambient Intelligence, Boris De Ruyter, Achilles Kameas, Periklis Chatzimisios, and Irene Mavrommati (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9425. Springer International Publishing, 252-267. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ 978--3--319--26005--1_17Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. BJ Fogg. 2009. A Behavior Model for Persuasive Design. In Proc. Persuasive '09. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 40, 7 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 1541948.1541999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Eric B. Hekler, Predrag Klasnja, Jon E. Froehlich, and Matthew P. Buman. 2013. Mind the Theoretical Gap: Interpreting, Using, and Developing Behavioral Theory in HCI Research. In Proc. CHI'13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3307-3316. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 2470654.2466452 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bettina B. Hoeppner, Susanne S. Hoeppner, Lourah Seaboyer, Melissa R. Schick, Gwyneth W. Y. Wu, Brandon G. Bergman, and John F. Kelly. 2015. How Smart are Smartphone Apps for Smoking Cessation? A Content Analysis. Nicotine & Tobacco Research (2015). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv117Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Predrag Klasnja, Sunny Consolvo, and Wanda Pratt. 2011. How to Evaluate Technologies for Health Behavior Change in HCI Research. In Proc. CHI '11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3063-3072. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979396 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Lopez-Meyer, Y. Patil, T. Tiffany, and E. Sazonov. 2013. Detection of Hand-to-Mouth Gestures Using a RF Operated Proximity Sensor for Monitoring Cigarette Smoking. Open Biomed Eng J 9 (2013), 41-49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jeni Paay, Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B. Skov, Lars Lichon, and Stephan Rasmussen. 2015a. Understanding Individual Differences for Tailored Smoking Cessation Apps. In Proc. CHI'15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1699-1708. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 2702123.2702321 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jeni Paay, Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B. Skov, Nirojan Srikandarajah, and Umachanger Brinthaparan. 2015b. QuittyLink: Using Smartphones for Personal Counseling to Help People Quit Smoking. In Proc. MobileHCI'15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 98-104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2785830.2785877 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. L. Palazzolo. 2013. Electronic cigarettes and vaping: a new challenge in clinical medicine and public health. A literature review. Front Public Health 1 (2013), 56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bernd Ploderer, Wally Smith, Steve Howard, Jon Pearce, and Ron Borland. 2012. Things You Don't Want to Know About Yourself: Ambivalence About Tracking and Sharing Personal Information for Behaviour Change. In Proc. OzCHI'12. ACM, NY, USA, 489-492. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2414536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. James O. Prochaska, Susan Butterworth, Colleen A. Redding, Verna Burden, Nancy Perrin, Michael Leo, Marna Flaherty-Robb, and Janice M. Prochaska. 2008. Initial efficacy of MI, {TTM} tailoring and HRI's with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion. Preventive Medicine 46, 3 (2008), 226 - 231. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.007 Multiple Health Behavior Change (MHBC) Research.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. C Protano, LM Di Milia, GB Orsi, and M Vitali. 2015. Electronic cigarette: a threat or an opportunity for public health? State of the art and future perspectives. Clin Ter 166, 1 (2015), 32-37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Oren Rom, Alessandra Pecorelli, Giuseppe Valacchi, and Abraham Z. Reznick. 2015. Are E-cigarettes a safe and good alternative to cigarette smoking? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1340, 1 (2015), 65-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12609Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Philipp M. Scholl, Nagihan Kücükyildiz, and Kristof Van Laerhoven. 2013. When Do You Light a Fire?: Capturing Tobacco Use with Situated, Wearable Sensors. In Proc. UbiComp'13 Adjunct. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1295-1304. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2494091. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Saul Shiffman. 2005. Dynamic Influences on Smoking Relapse Process. Journal of Personality 73, 6 (2005), 1715-1748.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Qu Tang, Damon J. Vidrine, Eric Crowder, and Stephen S. Intille. 2014. Automated Detection of Puffing and Smoking with Wrist Accelerometers. In Proc. Pervasive Health '14. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, 80- 87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth. 2014.254978 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. VapeTracker: Tracking Vapor Consumption to Help E-cigarette Users Quit

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450340823
      DOI:10.1145/2851581

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of5,000submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader