skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858388acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access
Best Paper

Learn Piano with BACh: An Adaptive Learning Interface that Adjusts Task Difficulty Based on Brain State

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present Brain Automated Chorales (BACh), an adaptive brain-computer system that dynamically increases the levels of difficulty in a musical learning task based on pianists' cognitive workload measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. As users' cognitive workload fell below a certain threshold, suggesting that they had mastered the material and could handle more cognitive information, BACh automatically increased the difficulty of the learning task. We found that learners played with significantly increased accuracy and speed in the brain-based adaptive task compared to our control condition. Participant feedback indicated that they felt they learned better with BACh and they liked the timings of the level changes. The underlying premise of BACh can be applied to learning situations where a task can be broken down into increasing levels of difficulty.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1738-file3.mp4

mp4

78.9 MB

References

  1. Daniel Afergan, Evan M. Peck, Erin T. Solovey, Andrew Jenkins, Samuel W. Hincks, Eli T. Brown, Remco Chang, and Robert J.K. Jacob. 2014a. Dynamic difficulty using brain metrics of workload. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2014), 3797-3806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Daniel Afergan, Tomoki Shibata, Samuel W. Hincks, Evan M. Peck, Beste F. Yuksel, Remco Chang, and Robert J.K. Jacob. 2014b. Brain-Based Target Expansion. Proc. UIST 2014 (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Daniel W. Ash and Dennis H. Holding. 1990. Backward versus forward chaining in the acquisition of a keyboard skill. Human Factors 32 (1990), 139-146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hasan Ayaz, Patricia A Shewokis, Scott Bunce, Kurtulus Izzetoglu, Ben Willems, and Banu Onaral. 2012. Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment. Neuroimage 59, 1 (2012), 36-47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Miriam H. Beauchamp, Alain Dagher, John A. D. Aston, and Julien. Doyon. 2003. Dynamic functional changes associated with cognitive skill learning of an adapted version of the Tower of London task. NeuroImage 20 (2003), 1649-1660. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ellen R. Bialo and Jay Sivin-Kachala. 1996. The effectiveness of technology in schools: A summary of recent research. (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Roland Brünken, Jan L Plass, and Detlev Leutner. 2003. Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist 38, 1 (2003), 53-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Rafael A. Calvo, Sidney D'Mello, Jonathan Gratch, and Arvid Kappas (Eds). 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Affective Computing. Oxford University Press, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Diane Damos and Christopher D. Wickens. 1980. The identification and transfer of time-sharing skills. Acta Psychologica 46 (1980), 15-39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ton de Jong. 2010. Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science 38 (2010), 105-134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009--9110-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mark D'Esposito, Bradley R. Postle, and Bart Rypma. 2000. Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event-related fMRI studies. Experimental brain research 133, 1 (2000), 3-11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10933205Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stephen H. Fairclough. 2009. Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interacting with Computers 21, 1--2 (Jan. 2009), 133-145. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.011 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Peter T Fox, Marcus E Raichle, Mark A Mintun, and Carmen Dence. 1988. Glucose During Focal Physiologic Neural Activity Nonoxidaive Consumption. Science 241 (1988), 462-464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Tycho K. Fredericks, Sang D. Choi, Jason Hart, Steven E. Butt, and Anil Mital. 2005. An investigation of myocardial aerobic capacity as a measure of both physical and cognitive workloads. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35 (2005), 1097-1107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Hugh Garavan, Dan Kelley, Allyson Rosen, Steve M. Rao, and Elliot A. Stein. 2000. Practice-related functional activation changes in a working memory task. Microscopy research and technique 51, 1 (2000), 54-63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alan Gevins, Michael E. Smith, Harrison Leong, Linda McEvoy, Susan Whitfield, Robert Du, and Georgia Rush. 1998. Monitoring working memory load during computer-based tasks with EEG pattern recognition methods. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40, 1 (1998), 79-91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alan Gevins, Michael E. Smith, Linda McEvoy, and Daphne Yu. 1997. High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: Effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cerebral Cortex 7 (1997), 374-385. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/7.4.374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Alexander Gundel and Glenn F. Wilson. 1992. Topographical changes in the ongoing EEG related to the difficulty of mental tasks. Brain topography 5, 1 (1992), 17-25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshua Harrison, Kurtulus Izzetoglu, Hasan Ayaz, Ben Willems, Sehchang Hah, Ulf Ahlstrom, Hyun Woo, Patricia Shewokis, Scott C. Bunce, and Banu Onaral. 2014. Cognitive workload and learning assessment during the implementation of a next-generation air traffic control technology using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 44, 4 (2014), 429-440.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Shamsi T Iqbal, Xianjun Sam Zheng, and Brian P Bailey. 2004. Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction. Extended abstracts of the 2004 conference on Human factors and computing systems CHI 04 (2004), 1477. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/985921.986094 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Chen-Lin C. Kulik James A. Kulik and Robert L. Bangert-Drowns. 1985. Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Elementary schools. Computers in Human Behavior 1 (1985), 59-74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Slava Kalyuga. 2003. The expertise reversal effect. Educational psychologist 38, 1 (2003), 23-31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Slava Kalyuga. 2007. Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review 19, 4 (2007), 509-539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Slava Kalyuga. 2011. Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need? Educational Psychology Review 23 (2011), 1-19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010--9150--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Clare Kelly and Hugh Garavan. 2005. Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. Cerebral Cortex 15, August (2005), 1089-1102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Etienne Koechlin, Gianpaolo Basso, Pietro Pietrini, Seth Panzer, and Jordan Grafman. 1999. The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition. Nature 399 (May 1999), 148-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/20178Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. James A. Kulik. 1994. Technology Assessment in Education and Training. Eva Baker and Harold F. O'Neil Jr, Chapter Meta-analytic Studies of findings on computer-based instruction., 9-34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Taija M M Lahtinen, Jukka P. Koskelo, Tomi Laitinen, and Tuomo K. Leino. 2007. Heart rate and performance during combat missions in a flight simulator. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 78, 4 (2007), 387-391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Dara S. Manoach, Gottfried Schlaug, Bettina Siewert, David G. Darby, Benjamin M. Bly, Andrew Benfield, Robert R. Edelman, and Steven Warach. 1997. Prefrontal cortex fMRI signal changes are correlated with working memory load. Neuroreport 8, 2 (1997), 545-549. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9080445Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Richard E. Mayer. 2005. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Roxana Moreno. 2010. Cognitive load theory: more food for thought. Instructional Science 38, November 2009 (2010), 135-141. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009--9122--9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Roger Nkambou, Riichiro Mizoguchi, and Jacqueline Bourdeau. 2010. Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hyacinth S. Nwana. 1990. Intelligent tutoring systems: an overview. Artificial Intelligence Review 4, 4 (1990), 251-277. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00168958Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Fred Paas, Juhani E. Tuovinen, Huib Tabbers, and Pascal W.M. Van Gerven. 2003. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational psychologist 38, 1 (2003), 63-71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Fred G Paas. 1992. Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology 84, 4 (1992), 429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Evan M. Peck, Beste F. Yuksel, Alvitta Ottley, Rob J.K. Jacob, and Remco Chang. 2013. Using fNIRS Brain Sensing to Evaluate Information Visualization Interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2013), 473-482. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Rosalind Picard. 1997. Affective computing 252 (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Russell A Poldrack. 2000. Imaging brain plasticity: conceptual and methodological issues a theoretical review. Neuroimage 12, 1 (2000), 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Grega Repovs and Alan Baddeley. 2006. The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cognitive psychology. Neuroscience 139, 1 (2006), 5-21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Ron J.C.M. Salden, Fred Paas, Nick J. Broers, and Jeroen J.G. van Merrinboer. 2004. Mental effort and performance as determinants for the dynamic selection of learning tasks in air traffic control training. Instructional Science 32, 1--2 (2004), 153-172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Wolfgang Schnotz and Christian Kurschner. 2007. A eeconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review 19 (2007), 469-508. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007--9053--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Holger Schultheis and Anthony Jameson. 2004. Assessing cognitive load in adaptive hypermedia systems: Physiological and behavioral methods. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 3137 (2004), 225-234. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b99480Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Erin Treacy Solovey, Audrey Girouard, Krysta Chauncey, Leanne M Hirshfield, Angelo Sassaroli, Feng Zheng, Sergio Fantini, and Robert J K Jacob. 2009. Using fNIRS Brain Sensing in Realistic HCI Settings : Experiments and Guidelines. Proc. UIST 2009 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Erin Treacy Solovey, Paul Schermerhorn, Matthias Scheutz, Angelo Sassaroli, Sergio Fantini, and Robert J K Jacob. 2012. Brainput : Enhancing Interactive Systems with Streaming fNIRS Brain Input. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. John Sweller. 1988. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science 12, 2 (1988), 257-285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. John Sweller. 1999. Instructional Design in Technical Areas. ACER Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Daniel Szafir and Bilge Mutlu. 2012. Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 11-20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Daniel Szafir and Bilge Mutlu. 2013. ARTFul: adaptive review technology for flipped learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1001-1010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Pascal W M Van Gerven, Fred Paas, Jeroen J G Van Merrienboer, and Henk G. Schmidt. 2004. Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology 41 (2004), 167-174. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469--8986.2003.00148.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Arno Villringer and Britton Chance. 1997. Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function. Trends in Neurosciences 20 (1997). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9347608Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Lev Vygotsky. 1978. Interaction between learning and development. Mind and Society (1978), 79-91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Christopher D. Wickens, Shaun. Hutchins, Thomas. Carolan, and John. Cumming. 2013. Effectiveness of Part-Task Training and Increasing-Difficulty Training Strategies: A Meta-Analysis Approach. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2013). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812451994Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Dennis C. Wightman and Gavan Lintern. 1985. Part-Task Training for Tracking and manual control. Human Factors 27, 3 (1985), 267-283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Bin Xie and Gavriel Salvendy. 2000. Prediction of mental workload in single and multiple task environments. International journal of cognitive ergonomics 4 (2000), 213-242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Beste F. Yuksel, Daniel Afergan, Evan M. Peck, Garth Griffin, Lane Harrison, Nick Chen, Remco Chang, and Rob J.K. Jacob. 2015. BRAAHMS: A Novel Adaptive Musical Interface Based on Users' Cognitive State. Proc. NIME 2015 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Learn Piano with BACh: An Adaptive Learning Interface that Adjusts Task Difficulty Based on Brain State

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader